Bihar CM Nitish Kumar addresses an election meeting at Raghunathpur, in Siwan district, 20 Oct, 2020 | PTI
Bihar CM Nitish Kumar addresses an election meeting at Raghunathpur, in Siwan district, 20 Oct, 2020 | PTI
Text Size:

As you enter Sasaram from Arrah in Bihar, one Paswan after another tells you that they’re planning to vote for Laltain, the Rashtriya Janata Dal’s lantern symbol. They’re fed up with Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, and want change.

What’s curious is that the Sasaram seat also has a candidate from the Lok Janshakti Party (LJP), whose formidable founder Ram Vilas Paswan died a few weeks ago. “It’s not about caste, it’s about who can defeat Nitish,” Paswan voters say.

Some of them have been traditional supporters of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), but not all. On the drive here from Patna, as also in the interiors of Sasaram, many voters say they are willing to cross traditional caste lines this time because the main issue this election is: “Nitish has to go”.

Forget for a moment all the talk about caste and coalitions, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), the internecine games between the parties. Forget the predictions and the psephology. Just an ear to the ground tells you of a singular chorus growing louder by the day: Nitish must go.


Also read: With each passing rally, Bihar CM Nitish Kumar is losing his ‘Mr Cool’ image


Vote Nitish out

This is not a Narendra Modi election, though the BJP campaign tells voters to vote on account of their faith in the Prime Minister. This is not a Rahul Gandhi election, though he’s doing his rallies. Caste remains important but this is not a caste election, because many voters say they don’t want to be blackmailed with the fear of Lalu Yadav’s ‘Jungle Raj’ anymore.

Tejashwi Yadav has managed to create some buzz around himself, and his campaign pitch is just right. But this is not a Tejaswhi election either: more people refer to his side as Laltain and Lalu than Tejashwi.

This is also not a Chirag Paswan election, though he’s won the hearts of the young with his rebellion, far beyond the votes he’s going to get. Chirag has lit the fire, he’s the catalyst, much more than Tejashwi, who opened up this election, assuring people that despite the BJP-JD(U) alliance, things may be possible after the result. The LJP’s candidates are attracting their caste vote, but it’s at the narrative level that Chirag has made a difference. You don’t meet any voter who says they’re unhappy with Nitish Kumar, but don’t have an option. Chirag has opened up a range of possibilities.

One voter we met spoke of Tejashwi and Chirag as if they were on the same side. They’re not. Chirag Paswan swears his allegiance to Modi, whereas Tejashwi is the face of anti-Modi aspirations. Yet the two young men appear to be on the same side, the side of the voters who want to give Nitish Kumar involuntary retirement.

Forget which ally is with which party. There are two sides this election: those who want Nitish Kumar to stay and those who want him to go. That’s the central polarisation. Those who want the chief minister to stay are feeling the heat.

Manjhi leader Jitan Ram Manjhi may be with Nitish Kumar these days, but Manjhi voters will tell you that they prefer Laltain and Lalu. Nitish Kumar’s big contribution to caste politics may have led to the extraction of lower OBCs from Lalu’s turf but you can meet Nonias, Kushwahas, Tantis and Prajapatis echoing the same sentiment: Nitish Kumar must go.


Also read: Chirag, Nitish, caste, Naxals and land reform — Modi’s 5 messages to Bihar voters


No more ‘Sushasan Babu’

Ironically, the strongest defenders of Nitish Kumar now are not the lower OBCs but the Modi-loving, Lalu-fearing upper castes. In a Brahmin basti in Sasaram, voters say they are voting for the NDA. They don’t say JD(U) or its symbol Teer, the arrow. They pretend it’s not about Nitish Kumar and they don’t name Modi. You’ll have to ask them about Nitish Kumar to hear apologetic one-liners such as, “Kaam to kiya hai (He has worked)”.

Those demanding change counter, “Kya kaam kiya hai? (What has he done?)” When you ask them what’s the biggest issue this election, they say Nitish Kumar.

These voters are like the old friend who stops liking you and can now only see faults in you. They attack one of Nitish Kumar’s main achievements this election, a scheme to make tap water reach every home. One voter rues, “Kisi ko jal mila toh nal nahi, jisko nal mila toh jal nahi. (Some got water but no tap, some got taps but no water).”

That’s uncharitable, because the scheme has seen great progress. But that’s how much people are vexed with Nitish Kumar. “What was the need to install overhead water tanks in Sasaram?” asks a shopkeeper in a rare instance of a voter complaining about getting something from the government. “In the remote hilly areas there was greater need for these. There they haven’t installed them.”

The sum of these arguments is that Nitish Kumar is no longer a leader who can command administrative efficiency. He can no longer call himself Sushasan Babu, Mr Good Governance.

You hear anger about corruption, from alleged embezzlement in the tap water scheme to bribes given for ration cards and food distribution, especially during the Covid lockdown. This is why Chirag Paswan is promising to put Nitish Kumar behind bars for corruption.


Also read: Dalit voters will be the X factor in Bihar election — they vote differently than in UP


Anyone but Nitish

You hear a lot of resentment about the economic hardships caused by the lockdown. You hear people complaining about how Nitish Kumar focused on hardware — roads and electricity — but not software — education, health and jobs.

The word you hear the most is rozgar  jobs. How are people to buy the motorcycles to ply these roads if they don’t have jobs? How are they to buy the white goods to use electricity? Look at me, says a fruit seller, I’m selling fruits after a graduate degree.

The anger is highest amongst the youth, who have completely slipped out of Nitish Kumar’s hands. You can even find Modi-loving upper-caste youth who are willing to vote for Tejashwi Yadav or Chirag Paswan, just to see Nitish Kumar go home. These are people who haven’t seen Lalu’s ‘Jungle Raj’ days.

They’re just done with Nitish Kumar. “Ab ho gaye pandrah saal,” they say, 15 years are now over, as if that’s a cut-off limit of sorts. To them, Nitish Kumar comes across as a leader who takes the chief minister’s chair for granted, like personal property. “It’s not his father’s chair,” you hear often. “He’s become arrogant like a king.”

The resentment is strong enough that people don’t care who the next chief minister could be. Anyone will do.

Nitish Kumar’s big hope is that women voters will save him. But he’s disappointed them too, with a failed prohibition. Sunita Devi, an activist in Sasaram who led an agitation to demand prohibition, says the result has been mixed. “Men get their alcohol home delivered so there’s still drunken domestic violence, but less than before, not least because bootlegged alcohol is expensive,” she says. But that’s not enough for her to champion Nitish Kumar’s cause. “We suffered so much in the lockdown. Women were unable to feed their children. Men don’t have jobs. These things affect women too,” she says.

The name you hear the least is Modi, at least in places where the JD(U) and LJP are contesting. People blame all the economic distress, even inflation, on Nitish Kumar. Who knows how the numbers may stack up after the election, but Nitish Kumar is so unpopular now that if the BJP props him as chief minister one more time, it can only be at the cost of Modi’s standing among voters in Bihar.

The author is contributing editor to ThePrint. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

14 Comments Share Your Views

14 COMMENTS

  1. In general, the USA system is better. Whoever it be not more than two terms at all. The reason is this. If that person does not like a section of the people these people will have difficulty fr whole life.

    • Now time has changing very fast so the political persons say prime minister, chief ministers , ministers ,M.Ps and MLAs. must be changed quickly ,better if after every 5 years the maximum may be 10 years . Continuance of Modi ji for second term is blacking his image . He saw burning of his effigy on Dussehara day in place of RAVAN. The economy of country has tanked and GDP fall is worst of whole world . It all happened in his second term.

  2. Modi-Shah have set up Nitish Kumar to take the fall for their failures. How is it that Sushasan Babu in the 09 yrs of Manmohan-Sonia became an impotent administrator after 2015? State after state that was doing well in the UPA years now seem to be floundering economically. The ruling Gujarati duo in Delhi have well and truly cooked Nitish Kumar’s goose by egging Jr Paswan and encouraging Jr Yadav in this election. Nitish can only watch helplessly as the rug gets pulled from under his feet and he takes a tumble. There will be no JD(U) once Nitish Babu loses power. The warning for Mama Chauhan in Bhopal and Yediyurappa in Bangalore couldn’t be more clear.

  3. Yes this true that a large number of particularly unemployed youth angry with Nitish and its pretty obvious if some CM rule for 15 long years as large as Bihar state the anti-incumbency factor always be there. But can’t it is only Nitish who built his vote percentage block roughly 16 to 19% only based on his own work in highly caste and religion divided state. Can anyone asked why any Yadav or Muslim vote other than RJD or any forward caste will vote other than BJP? the simple answer if No this is definitely in post era of Lalu. It is only Nitish Kumar who built his vote whether in women or some percentage from all caste base on his work. Nitish was a champion of secularism and stood up against Modi in 2014 and fought alone in Bihar and happened he end up winning of 2 seat out of 40 why because no Muslim voted him back in 2014.

  4. Entire article is a nonsense. But one line did catch my attention. “Modi loving upper caste” as if only upper caste people vote for Modi. Author is still living in la-la land and cannot digest the truth that Modi is loved by vast cross section of society. Two consecutive majority government is not enough for author to understand? Really?

  5. Most people who want parivatan would
    ” Shoe I am ” THE STUPIDO
    instead of 8th pass fool.

    A bigger fool can bring better parivatan in terms of rioters and corruption.

    Hence “THE STUPIDO ” must be ready to take the reins.

  6. The print says nitish bhagao. Aur chara choron ko lao. Wah kya patrakarita hai. Aur choron ki parvi kanewale patrakaron ko chanda do aur desh ko nasht karwao. Samjhe Indians.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here