She could have eloped with her boyfriend or directly talked to her in-laws and made a scene to call off the marriage. Rather she chose this step as she thought she would be simply off the hook and in comfort. Rather than calling out her demented state, people are attacking other things.
Yes instead of the accused we should put the marriage on trial. I think when women are the accused so many articles written trying to shield them through lenses like they are targeted more. They had no choice, as if they lack agency. I mean they don’t have agency to speak bur have agency to plan such a serious plan. And now question is on marriage and not on the action of the accused, wow. Lol on this author
“The same parents who push their daughters to accept nothing less than the best, magically expect her to fold, to set aside the ambition they spent years cultivating and “settle down” in accordance with a set of archaic rules governing their sexual freedom.”
What is the author implying? No marriage itself or a marriage where there is an abundance of sexual freedom. And as per her what should parents support? Sexual freedom of their daughters without consideration to anything else. In that case they can leave the responsibility of their daughters marriage. Just let them get their children educated and be on their own.
“But some of these runaway brides are simply playing by the rules of the system.”
In US a man murdered his wife because divorce was costly and he wanted custody of his children. The rules were simply against him.
Will the author defend this man in similar manner or for that manner should anyone defend him?
She could have eloped with her boyfriend or directly talked to her in-laws and made a scene to call off the marriage. Rather she chose this step as she thought she would be simply off the hook and in comfort. Rather than calling out her demented state, people are attacking other things.
Yes instead of the accused we should put the marriage on trial. I think when women are the accused so many articles written trying to shield them through lenses like they are targeted more. They had no choice, as if they lack agency. I mean they don’t have agency to speak bur have agency to plan such a serious plan. And now question is on marriage and not on the action of the accused, wow. Lol on this author
“The same parents who push their daughters to accept nothing less than the best, magically expect her to fold, to set aside the ambition they spent years cultivating and “settle down” in accordance with a set of archaic rules governing their sexual freedom.”
What is the author implying? No marriage itself or a marriage where there is an abundance of sexual freedom. And as per her what should parents support? Sexual freedom of their daughters without consideration to anything else. In that case they can leave the responsibility of their daughters marriage. Just let them get their children educated and be on their own.
If arranged or Love marriage Only common thread is pre marriage or post marriage paramours, Greed for hubby’s money for post life