Chinese commentary suggests that the Mecca pact has altered the regional strategic equation and is a cause of concern for India. One analysis identified three challenges.
Chinese commentators saw Marco Rubio’s India visit as more than diplomacy — linking it to Quad revival, Indo-Pacific strategy, US-China rivalry and India’s balancing role.
Chinese commentators consistently portray India as the driver of rapprochement. New Delhi’s outreach is framed as a pragmatic, reluctant choice shaped by multiple pressures.
The intricate and deeply rooted complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict pose a formidable challenge to China’s intended role and ambitions as a peace broker in the Middle East.
It’s tempting to read Baba Ramdev’s recent spats as an imminent ‘friendship cancel’ with the BJP. After all, the two entities have been locked in a symbiotic dance for years.
Russia now accounts for about half of India’s crude imports. Experts say this reflects source diversification, but high concentration carries risks from sanctions, shipping curbs.
Sergio Gor visits C-130J production line at TLMAL as Tata and Lockheed Martin explore the Medium Transport Aircraft competition and expand defence manufacturing in India.
At some point Pakistani dictators begin to show paranoia. That’s the strategic reality most relevant to India since the late fifties. Munir’s case is worse, like some sudden acrophobia.
Madam Sana Hashmi, China is ruled by one party CCP with the power of PLA. The Chinese people simply have no say on any matters, internal or external. So who cares what the Chinese commentary says.
Dear The Print, Kindly stop nonsense articles about what China thinks. Use Sana Hashemi for something more constructive. The Chinese people look down upon not only the Indians, but people of most of its neighboring countries and hence their opinion are mostly biased and negative. Why should we Indians care for such negative opinions. Unless the objective is to simply learn what the Chinese feel and say so that Indians can be extra-sensitive to their feelings? The Chinese want whole of Arunachal Pradesh, they want India to lose all wars against Pakistan, they want India to become poor in every sense. Is this the objective of writing such articles?
Madam Sana Hashmi, China is ruled by one party CCP with the power of PLA. The Chinese people simply have no say on any matters, internal or external. So who cares what the Chinese commentary says.
Dear The Print, Kindly stop nonsense articles about what China thinks. Use Sana Hashemi for something more constructive. The Chinese people look down upon not only the Indians, but people of most of its neighboring countries and hence their opinion are mostly biased and negative. Why should we Indians care for such negative opinions. Unless the objective is to simply learn what the Chinese feel and say so that Indians can be extra-sensitive to their feelings? The Chinese want whole of Arunachal Pradesh, they want India to lose all wars against Pakistan, they want India to become poor in every sense. Is this the objective of writing such articles?