Pangong lake | Commons
Pangong lake | Commons
Text Size:

New Delhi: With China not confirming dates for a fresh round of corps commander talks, India is not taking anything to chance and is being “extra sensitive” along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as well as the western sector bordering Pakistan, ThePrint has learnt.

Sources in the defence and security establishment said the situation at the LAC remains tense after at least four rounds of firing between India and China.

While two rounds of firing took place at the southern banks of the Pangong Tso on 29 and 31 August — amid new rules of engagement as reported earlier — sources said another two rounds of warning shots were fired at the northern banks of the lake after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met his Chinese counterpart on 4 September in Russia.

The Army has so far confirmed only one round of warning shots at the southern bank of Pangong Tso on the intervening night of 29-30 August.

On Wednesday, South China Morning Post reported that China had raised its combat readiness to the second-highest possible last week after an exchange of gunfire, but the alert was lowered after a meeting of both the foreign ministers. The increase to second level meant deployment of more weapons and troops at the front line, and ramping up of training exercises for commanders, officers and soldiers, said the report.

Amid these developments, sources said the worry is China’s delay to give dates for the talks that were agreed upon by both sides in principle, and were supposed to be held in the early days of the ongoing week.

This indicates that either China is still firming up the agenda for talks or is calibrating a response to India’s pre-emptive action on the intervening night of 29-30 August.

“The Corps Commander talks have been agreed upon in principle by China. However, they are yet to come back with confirmed dates. As per the earlier plan, the talks were to be held in the first part of this week at the most,” a source said.

The terms of engagement for the next round of corps commander talks will forgo the earlier concept of “equitable disengagement”, and will take into account the changed dynamics on the ground, which will give India better bargaining power.


Also read: China wanted ‘no escalation’ on hotline call in the day, tried to capture territory at night


‘China no longer in driving seat’

A second source explained that a lot of things have happened since the last round of corps commander talks on 2 August.

“The fact is that China is no longer in the driving seat. They have occupied an area in the northern banks claimed by both sides and now we have done the same in the southern banks. Even in the northern banks, troop deployment has been readjusted and hence we are at a dominating position than the Chinese who are at the ridgeline of Finger 4,” the source said.

Asked what China’s delay in confirming the dates meant, the source said, “They are obviously thinking what to do and how to go about with it. We are anyway operationally deployed all along the LoC but we are being extra sensitive.”

Precautionary deployment has been made to prevent China from transgressing into any new area, whether in Ladakh or any other part of the LAC which runs all the way up to the Northeast, added the source.

Operational alert

It was reported earlier that the Army, Navy and the Air Force have been put on operational alert. Troops have been “dynamically deployed” all along the LAC to prevent any attempt by the Chinese to open another front elsewhere.

Sources had earlier said that ever since the Indians dominated the heights in the southern banks of Pangong Tso, spread over 50 km, the Chinese have been trying to push them out.

“It is a sensitive situation. Indian soldiers continue to hold their positions. It is not a literal face-off since the troops are not standing face to face. However, the situation remains sensitive as the Chinese have made multiple attempts,” a source had earlier said.

In an interview with ThePrint this week, former 14 Corps Commander Lt Gen P.J.S. Pannu (retd) said China has misread India’s resolve to challenge its land-grabbing tactics and the probability of a military clash was high unless China finds itself an exit strategy.


Also read: Govt admits Ladakh ‘challenge’ in Lok Sabha, Rajnath confident of countering China aggression


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

3 Comments Share Your Views

3 COMMENTS

  1. snehesh you are the reason I come back to The Print to read your balanced,informitive articles.
    Sometime I used to read the retd..Chinese General Pang write ups and would be confused how he procured Indian military secrets and how openly was guiding and goading Chinese forces to usurp Indian territory.
    You are beacon of hope in digital media.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here