Members of European Parliament with PM Narendra Modi | PIB
Members of European Parliament and Madi Sharma (in yellow scarf) with PM Narendra Modi | PIB
Text Size:

Is PM Narendra Modi’s high-profile diplomacy obscuring serious foreign policy challenges for India? A recent hearing at the United States House of Representatives Sub Committee on Human Rights should give pause to policymakers in New Delhi.

From New York to Silicon Valley to Houston, Modi’s foreign policy initiatives have garnered much attention. Modi has personalised diplomacy with visible interactions in informal settings with leaders ranging from Barack Obama to Xi Jinping. Add to this the government’s posture vis-à-vis Pakistan and it is clear that on foreign policy, PM Modi is able to satisfy his domestic audience that feels India is “punching below its weight” as Brahma Chellaney, a national security expert, described it. But is the world buying it?

Also read: Several European parliamentarians visiting Kashmir are from Right-wing, anti-Islam parties

Going gets tougher

The basic storyline about India is as follows: it is an emerging global power with a growing economy and pluralistic democratic traditions. This combination makes India an attractive partner for Western democracies, especially the United States. While Russia may be enemy number one in popular perception, there is no doubt that the American foreign policy establishment views China as the real long-term challenge.

For India too, China presents a formidable challenge. With China-Pakistan relations in an ever-tighter embrace, India and the US have common interests not just in South Asia, but in the broader Asia-Pacific. This makes the case for a closer US-India relationship a slam dunk, as American basketball aficionados might call it.

Unsurprisingly, much effort and optimism are being invested in securing a closer strategic alliance between the world’s oldest and its largest democracy. At the Congressional human rights hearing, both Democrats and Republicans alluded to the importance of America and India’s shared values of pluralism and democracy. But this hearing was tougher on India than many expected.

Frustratingly for those who work on strengthening the India-US relationship, the going has been tougher than expected.

There are a variety of issues that dog the relationship. And there are two reasons of particular interest.

The first is that India’s economic heft is still not where it needs to be for it to take more mind space in Washington and other Western capitals. The second has to do with the rise of majoritarianism as a governing ideology in India.

Also read: How foreign media coverage of Kashmir crisis has become a headache for Modi govt

Not the calling card India needs

On the first point, it is no secret that economic power is an integral part of a modern national security strategy. A perusal of US government strategy documents shows that economic well-being has been long-recognised as a pillar of national security. The latest 2017 national security strategy is replete with references to the US economy. Tellingly, the document frequently refers to China as a serious rival in both military and economic terms.

China’s importance may seem obvious, but data makes things clearer. While China’s per capita income is far below that of the US and Europe, its economy has deep connections with economies around the world. In 2017, China was the biggest exporter and second biggest importer in the world. The US-China trade ($585 billion) was not far behind India’s total trade with all nations ($738 billion).

According to the World Bank’s country classification system, China is the only large country (by population) that jumped from low income to lower-middle-income to upper middle-income status between 1990 and 2016. Without a reformed and stronger economy that is fully integrated with global value chains, India is unlikely to measure up to the world’s great powers.

The other complicating factor is that the United States and the European Union still emphasise on liberal values. At the Congressional hearing, Kashmir took up much of the discussion time and US politicians were clearly expressing concern about what they felt were anti-democratic and illiberal moves by the Modi government in Kashmir and Assam. The US administration’s representatives at the hearing were more measured and diplomatic. However, they don’t face the pressures that politicians face from their constituents. Democrats especially were critical.

Modi’s endorsement of Trump in Houston may also have created some unpleasantness. All this must be seen within the context of numerous reports in international media on mob lynchings, rising intolerance, and general fears over minority rights in India.

Also read: Tough message for Modi: Political winds are shifting, from nationalism to economy, jobs

Modi may have gotten a group of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to visit Jammu and Kashmir this week, but it is likely to further damage India’s reputation. Most of these MEPs belong to far-Right parties, known for their anti-immigrant and illiberal views. Mind you, the Modi government did not allow Indian opposition MPs and senior United States Senator, Chris Van Hollen, to visit Kashmir. What message is India sending to the world?

India’s calling cards abroad so far have been Mahatma Gandhi and the secular democracy he died for. If India loses Gandhi’s ideals, a tighter embrace with key allies such as the United States will be that much more difficult. Without internal social cohesion, India’s economy will definitely underperform. Social cohesion and economic growth are interlinked.

Unfortunately, as The Economist notes in its recent special report on India, “Narendra Modi is damaging India’s economy as well as its democracy”. Blaming international media for “unfair” reporting isn’t going to help. Stepping back from the RSS-BJP majoritarian agenda will. It is in India’s national interest to do so.

The author is a politician, writer, and development expert. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

12 Comments Share Your Views


  1. No where in the western world mulagiri or pro islamic bs is a welcome , people around the world are repulsed by most or all things islamic, some are vocal others not so much…so no support for islamic activities. Print media must support reality and administer thought vaccination against islamic killer/victim act and islamic separatist identity games.

  2. Mr Soz makes some very valid points however reputations and places in the world are ever evolving and there is no reason for India to continue in the so called Gandhian mould just because the west wants it to. Mr. Modi continues to enjoy the support of millions of his countrymen as they believe he expresses their opinions and acts on them. The world has very little locus standi in terms of Kashmir, as long as the country is with him he need not bother about the critics.

  3. Is your opinion based on what the Economist magazine decries??!!! Economist has got more things wrong that right and except for a few angrezi toadies like you, nobody takes them seriously. And since your source of information is the economist and other such trash, let me tell you what is happening in Europe….
    Most European countries have strong right wing movements, parties and now governments. THis is primarily because of the large scale Muslim infiltration of Muslims. Despite allowing Muslims to come and settle there and giving them all possible assistance, the Muslims have started demanding sharia law and other barbaric Islamic practices. High streets are full of Muslim women wearing hizab. And of course all recent incidents of terrorism have been Muslims. An old Muslim custom of spitting in the plate they eat in..

    So these MPs do reflect what the current reality of Europe is. Also Indian diplomacy is now tough and the very fact that web have not agreed to a trade deal with the US, despite immense pressure is testimony to the fact that we do what we will.

  4. If ThePrint allows personal opinions of Liberals to be shared, why it doesn’t allow Rightists? Rightism is not equal to terrorism, communism is. History is proof. This is the reason you guys loosing trust of 80% of the people. Yesterday Washington Post headline on Baghdadi was testimony of how media outlets are filled with low IQ biased morons.

    • Mr. Jha: so Hitler was a communist. Mussolini was a communist. According to you this is proof from history?

      Now you see why Rightists are banned from certain websites?

    • Even if it’s the world’s opinion (which it is not unless one considers the US/UK to be the world) how does it matter? India needs to do what is in it’s own interest, not keep looking for a pat on the back from the West. As it is the West, with it’s own poor record and hypocrisies is hardly in any position to take a higher moral stand. Most of the world’s conflict zones are in the state they are, thanks to the West’s shenanigans and a substantial local contribution. India needs no pontifications from the West, be it from their media or governments. Let the West first heal itself.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here