File photo of Maharashtra Chief Minister and Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray with his son and Yuva Sena chief Aaditya Thackeray (right) | Photo: PTI
File photo of Maharashtra Chief Minister and Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray with his son and Yuva Sena chief Aaditya Thackeray (right) | Photo: PTI
Text Size:

Protests against the Narendra Modi government’s Citizenship Amendment Act have claimed more than 25 lives in India. But in Mumbai and the rest of Maharashtra, the protests have been peaceful, without internet shutdowns or bans on public gatherings.

Maharashtra is led by Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, who heads the Shiv Sena, a former ally of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that had demanded the replication of Assam’s National Register of Citizens (NRC) for Mumbai as well — to identify and oust ‘illegal’ Bangladeshis. It had also applauded Home Minister Amit Shah, who often refers to these refugees as “termites” and “infiltrators”, for his bold stand. 

But the party that has always endorsed the ‘Hindustan for Hindus’ brand of politics, is now forced to revisit its earlier position and subscribe to the idea of composite nationalism that its new alliance partners — the Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) — follow.

“Uddhav Thackeray held two urgent interactions with nearly a hundred religious, social and political leaders from the Muslim community last week and assured them that no one would be allowed to snatch away their rights. He urged them to wait for the Supreme Court’s verdict on the constitutional validity of the Act,” Abdul Sattar, Shiv Sena MLA from Sillod in Aurangabad district who attended one of the meetings, told ThePrint.

“For now, we are buying his assurance, but that does not mean the (Muslim) community can lower its guard even for a second,” added Sattar, who joined the Shiv Sena before the Maharashtra assembly election in October 2019, after spending more than two decades in the Congress.

It’s the confusion of the Shiv Sena that keeps the community on guard. The party first accused the Modi government of planning an “invisible partition” of Hindus and Muslims ahead of the tabling of the Citizen (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha where, curiously, it voted in favour, only to do another U-turn two days later by abstaining from voting on the bill in the Rajya Sabha. Media reports linked the party’s flip-flops to threats from the Congress, a strident critic of the BJP’s immigration policy, to pull the plug on the newly formed Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi. (Ironically, the maximum number of deportations of ‘illegal’ Bangladeshi and Pakistani Muslims from Mumbai, police data reveals, happened during 1988-1991, when present NCP chief Sharad Pawar was the chief minister and a member of the Congress).

In the end, the Shiv Sena announced that it would support the bill — only if the new citizens are barred from voting for a 25-year period. “For decades, the Congress has been accused of indulging in Muslim vote bank politics; the BJP will be similarly accused of shoring up its Hindu vote bank through this bill if it doesn’t heed our suggestion,” warned Shiv Sena MP in the Rajya Sabha, Sanjay Raut, who doubles up as the editor of the party’s mouthpiece, Saamana.


Also read: Shiv Sena was hated by Indian liberals as extremist Hindutva party. Now, it’s their darling


Doubts remain

But the Shiv Sena’s climbdown has cut little ice with Ajit Joshi, an engineering student protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in Mumbai. Joshi has his reasons. After becoming CM, he points out, Uddhav Thackeray put two contentious infrastructure projects launched by the previous BJP government under Devendra Fadnavis — the Metro Car Shed at Aarey Colony and the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train — on hold. “But no official announcement has come on the upcoming detention centre for illegal immigrants in Navi Mumbai.” Joshi says. Sanjay Raut insists the detention centre is meant to house “hundreds of Nigerian drug traffickers lodged in Maharashtra jails once they are released and awaiting deportation.”

Zeeshan Mohammed, 35, who migrated to Mumbai more than 20 years ago from Gorakhpur in eastern Uttar Pradesh and works in a bakery in Bhendi Bazaar in South Mumbai, feels that the media is being too hard on the Shiv Sena. “Back home, Muslims are living in fear since the day the BJP government led by Yogi Adityanath came to power in 2017. Mothers are afraid to pack meat in tiffin boxes, boys and girls of different communities are scared to talk to each other as vigilante groups roam unchecked attacking minorities on the basis of false rumours and with full support of the ruling political class. In contrast, Mumbai feels like jannat (heaven),” Mohammed says.

A majority of Mumbai’s 20.65 per cent Muslims live in its sprawling slums. Most agree that since Uddhav Thackeray took control of the Shiv Sena in 2012 after the death of his father Bal Thackeray, the party has toned down its communal rhetoric, and tried to reinvent itself as a more inclusive organisation.

But there have been some worrying lapses.

Earlier this year, an editorial in the Saamana demanded a ban on the burqa in public places across the country, similar to the one imposed in Sri Lanka following the Easter Sunday serial blasts that killed over 250 people; the editorial claimed that the face-covering veil posed a threat to national security.

“The Shiv Sena’s top leadership continued to take an anti-Islam position to show their core constituency that they were more ‘Hindu’ than the BJP, while on the ground, the party’s corporators were becoming more accessible. They helped us with school admissions for our children, protected us against extortion by cops, arranged bank loans and even participated in our festivals,” says a teacher in a government school in Byculla, one of Mumbai’s oldest neighbourhoods and home to a mix of communities. “But we all know that this change of heart is driven by only one factor: political survival,” he added, requesting anonymity.


Also read: Uddhav Thackeray as CM is good news for Maharashtra’s forests, wildlife and animal lovers


Building bridges 

In every assembly election between 1990 and 2004, the BJP in Maharashtra won less seats than the Shiv Sena, before catching up with it in 2009. In 2014, the Modi ‘wave’ ensured the BJP’s position as the single largest party with the Shiv Sena a distant second. To reclaim lost ground, the Shiv Sena showed its willingness to admit to past mistakes, and make new friends.

Ahead of the 2017 municipal elections in Mumbai, which the two parties fought separately, the Shiv Sena targeted property builders in India’s financial capital for creating “new islands of apartments” only for vegetarians — an unwritten code which bars sale or rent agreements with non-vegetarians, particularly Muslims.

It began printing the party’s propaganda material in Urdu and gave tickets to five Muslims in the elections to India’s richest municipal body; out of them two won, including Haji Mohammed Halim Khan from Behrampada. Located in the suburb of Bandra East, not far from “Matoshree”, the residence of the Thackeray clan, Behrampada is a warren of 10×12 feet houses — some even smaller — inhabited by lower middle class and poor Muslims. In the communal violence that engulfed Mumbai following the demolition of the Babri Masjid in December 1992, about 900 people were killed, 31 of them in Behrampada.

“Until the Shiv Sena put up a Hindu candidate from here, the seat was won by the Congress or the Samajwadi Party. But by fielding a Muslim from Behrampada for the first time, we felt that the party was asking us to let go of the past,” says a social activist who has lived in the neighbourhood for over four decades and voted for Khan. “It was a gesture of reconciliation.”

In the lead-up to the 2019 Lok Sabha election, the Shiv Sena started the ‘Me Marathi Musalman’ (I am a Marathi Muslim) campaign to counter the Muslim-Dalit alliance forged by their leaders, Prakash Ambedkar and Asaduddin Owaisi, and to spread the message that the party had never been against ‘patriotic Muslims’. It also demanded the implementation of a Muslim quota in Maharashtra, arguing that reservation in government jobs and education would lead to the advancement of the community.

“Building bridges with the community paid off for the Shiv Sena when a delegation of prominent Muslims from the state met Sonia Gandhi and urged her to support the party’s bid to form the government last month,” reveals Congress MP in the Rajya Sabha from Maharashtra, Kumar Ketkar. (In the election, the BJP won 105 seats in the 288-member assembly, and was expected to form a government with the Shiv Sena, which had bagged 56 seats. But the two parted ways when the Shiv Sena accused the BJP of retracting on a pre-election promise to share the chief minister’s post.)

“At first, she (Sonia Gandhi) was sceptical about the Sena’s commitment to secularism, but leaders were able to convince her that Uddhav Thackeray had no interest in pursuing a divisive agenda,” Ketkar adds.


Also read: How Uddhav Thackeray shed his Rahul Gandhi image to be a Shiv Sena leader in his own right


Shiv Sena’s ‘character’ 

But several hardcore Shiv Sainiks feel that the Shiv Sena’s Muslim outreach and its tie-up with the Congress and the NCP, which are fundamentally opposed to Hindutva, have robbed the party of its natural character.

“The Sena has always played the politics of hate and believed in the ideology ofthokshahi,” former Maharashtra chief minister Narayan Rane — a Shiv Sainik all his life but who is now a Rajya Sabha MP from the BJP — argues in his autobiography, No Holds Barred: My years in Politics.

Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray first incited the ‘Marathi manoos’ (sons of the soil) against South Indian migrants in the late 1960s. When the plank of Marathi identity found no takers outside the urban Mumbai-Konkan-Thane belt and the Shiv Sena failed to become a regional party with a pan-Maharashtra base, he shifted to the ‘rowdy Right’ and embraced Hindutva: pitting Hindus against Muslims by propagating the idea of a Hindu Nation from the mid-1980s onwards. (The report of the Srikrishna Commission, which investigated the Mumbai riots of 1992-93, blamed Bal Thackeray and several other leaders of the Shiv sena for inciting violent Hindu mobs to attack Muslims.)

‘’But the same Bal Thackeray facilitated the construction of the Haj House in Mumbai, raised the FSI (floor space index) for mosques when the BJP-Shiv Sena came to power in 1995, so that the faithful did not have to offer namaz on the streets, believed A.R Antulay of the Congress was the best chief minister Maharashtra ever had, and counted actor Dilip Kumar as a close friend,” counters Sanjay Raut, who also insists that the Mumbai riots were an “aberration”.

More than 30 per cent of Maharashtra’s population was born after the Mumbai riots. They offer no resonance to 25-year-old Safia Ashraf, who works in a pharmaceutical company in Navi Mumbai and has political aspirations. That’s why she is more willing to give the Shiv Sena a chance than her older relatives who lived through those dark times.

“Unlike the BJP, the Shiv Sena is not controlled by the RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh), which has always pushed for a Hindu Rashtra. It has the freedom to focus on development now that Uddhav Thackeray is the CM. This is an opportunity for the party to emerge as a strong regional player, like Biju Janata Dal in Odisha. But if the Shiv Sena reverts to its old ways and starts marginalising Muslims, the party will lose not just our community’s hard-earned support, but of every voter who wants the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi to complete its full term,” Ashraf says.

Uddhav Thackeray’s comment in the assembly last week, that mixing religion and politics was a mistake, suggests that the Shiv Sena’s course correction may not just be for temporary political benefit but marks a shift in ideological orientation, even though the party maintains it will never abandon Hindutva. Maharashtra’s Muslims can only hope that the Shiv Sena has truly turned a corner.

The author is an independent journalist. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

VIEW COMMENTS

10 COMMENTS

  1. You hope this supposed change of heart is for real. I grew up in the 90’s when the Shiv Sena was responsible for a lot of riots, gunda-gardi and problems in Mumbai. Uddhav seems to be a much more secular-liberal leader than Bal Thackeray was. Shiv Sena cannot outdo the BJP in Hindutva-ness any more because the BJP is swung way too far to the right encouraging extreme gunda/goon culture in UP and the North. Shiv Sena’s best tactic is to adhere to their Marathi-ness and be more accepting of everyone with roots in Maharashtra including Muslims, Christians and Buddhists.

  2. Many things are included in the article as a history of Shiva Sena. But the present scenario is different. The principles which were pursued by Late Bala Thakkeray had been discarded. Now a new principle had emerged. It reminds me Dritaratra of Mahabharatha. He was considered as unfit to rule by elders and the throne was given to his brother. He meekly accepted. But destiny took another turn and Dritarastra was made king. His only aim was that his son should become the king. He was ready to do anything to achieve his ambition. The Dritarastra of Shiva Sena also wanted the same thing that his son should take the oath as chief minister. For this he silenced all principles of Shiva Sena and cheated whoever against his ambition… Even after submerging all principles of Shiva Sena he couldn’t achieve his goal. The political parties, with whom he did compromise all Shiva Sena’s principles, didn’t consider that his son had requisite ability to take the oath as CM. By the time he had come to a long distance and the situation was such that he couldn’t rejoin BJP.. So he accepted the post of CM just to plan for his son’s crowning in future. It is a matter of future destiny. But he has to shed the principles of Hindutwa on which the party was surviving. Naturally he has to find new avenue for getting votes as he can not depend on Hindutwa. So the next choice was Muslims who have more voters after Hindus. even though a minority. But there is too much competition. Both his coalition partners congress and NCP were also after Muslim voters. It is sure that they don’t allow Shiva Sena to grab their votes. It is very difficult to tell further what will happen in future. So I am ending my comments.

  3. The more you see shiv Sena, RSS news and photographs in the Print, more certain you can be that it is no news day and these page fillers are needed.

  4. Uddhav has made it clear, the writing is on the wall. He is not here for anything particular which his father was of. Uddhav’s one and only goal is to be in power and ensure his son somehow manages to rein in. He knows deep within he or his son has no qualities that can qualify them to be CM of the state. Their speeches are way too dim when compared to their nearest relative and rival Raj Thackeray. Had they fought this election all by themselves, they know very well the scenario would have different. They never dared to ask for votes with Uddhav or Aditya as the CM face. Back stabbing BJP was easier task actually since Congress and NCP were anyways hungry for BJP’s blood/downfall and grab power. Uddhav choose the easier path. Forget Hindutva, Uddhav if needed will even offer Namaz or may declare Islamist terrorists as respectable persons like how Congress icon Digvijay Singh does. He would also follow Mani Shanker’s footsteps to praise Pakistan each time their terrorists hit our soil. Since Uddhav literally has nothing left in him. A vague empty pride and sense of utter insecurity took him here, and there is no return from this position.

  5. What “change of heart”? Utter nonsense! There is no heart to change. the only reason for the latest move is to get power and take the opportunity to earn more corrupt money. All three parties have divided up the ATM portfolios nicely! Whoever trusted them have themselves to blame!

    • Tell this to ashok, the fake liberal prostrating in front of SS leadership, and praying day and night that this crooked coalition turns out to be successful.

  6. As Far as I know over 20 MLAs of SS are keen to move, but are awaiting few more to break the party, they are extremely uncomfortable and feel out of place with the new love towards Congress and likes of Nawab Malik

  7. Still it is a Congress govt. and the agitation is limited to BJP ruled states and Congress is sponsoring it.
    No surprises.

Comments are closed.