scorecardresearch
Saturday, April 27, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionModi MonitorBy removing M.J. Akbar from his government, Narendra Modi must do our...

By removing M.J. Akbar from his government, Narendra Modi must do our dirty job

Follow Us :
Text Size:

The flaw was always there for us to see. We saw and turned away. We didn’t want to see.

How important is gender in the life of a politician? Certainly, in the hierarchy of things, caste plays a catalytic role, along with religion. Language, also, sometimes becomes central to identity, as we saw in the Bengali language movement that pushed for the creation of a new nation called Bangladesh in 1971. Class has always mattered, especially in Left-centred struggles.

But gender? Politicians across the political spectrum have always paid lip service to so-called ‘women’s issues.’ Whether it is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) or the Congress, the ‘par kati mahila’ has usually been a source of unease, neither evil nor goddess.

It took Sonia Gandhi, with her European upbringing that fully appreciated the work ethic of the working class, to understand that you needed women in politics to effect real change. So as she sat in the driver’s seat in Manmohan Singh’s first United Progressive Alliance government, Gandhi pushed for the passage of the Women’s Reservation Bill.


Also read: Tarun Tejpal’s gaming of legal system shows why #MeToo doesn’t believe in due process 


She ensured that it was passed in the Rajya Sabha, so that the bill would never die.

That bill has proved to be the Congress party’s single most important investment in egalitarian gender politics – although, note that even today, the party hardly talks about it, leave alone flaunt it.

In fact, the Congress has never taunted Prime Minister Narendra Modi about not passing the bill in the Lok Sabha, where it has an absolute majority. It’s all very well for Rahul Gandhi to promote gender equality in politics, but it’s equally clear that in the Congress party’s laundry list of ‘Things It Must Do’ to win back power, gender is way down at the bottom.

A moment in gender politics

Perhaps that’s why, older women journalists (like me) are watching with a certain astonishment at the manner in which the current protest around allegations of sexual abuse and assault by Minister of State for External Affairs M.J. Akbar is taking place.

It’s been a week since the first accusations, but it’s not as if the protests are ‘snowballing’ or ‘ramping up.’ That jargon would imply a hearty, enthusiastic, largely linear movement in which things inexorably move towards a solution in which, in the end, the bad guy is properly buried in the woodwork.

The truth is, hashtag #MeToo is still too convenient, like a latch to hang something on. Perhaps it’s a moment in India’s gender politics, brewing since the Mathura rape, or Bhanwari Devi, or Jyoti Singh alias Nirbhaya, that reminded us of the Constitutional principles, such as the Right to Life, just in case ordinary human decency wouldn’t do.

In the case of Akbar, the story is so fraught and so loaded with the passage of guilt, humiliation and time that hope emerges, but only sometimes.

The other problem is that his fate fully rests on Modi’s one-word decision.

Go.

We know from ThePrint colleague Sanya Dhingra’s story that the Prime Minister hasn’t said one word about Akbar’s alleged impropriety so far. At a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, he is believed to have maintained a stony silence, while a few colleagues briefly discussed the matter.


Also read: India’s MeToo will succeed if our laws catch up with it 


We have no idea if Modi is horror-struck just like the rest of us as he reads Ghazala Wahab’s piece in The Wire, or the Anonymous piece in FirstPost, on the considered brutality these women suffered at Akbar’s hands.

We have no clue if he’s mad as hell at the possibility that a supremely intelligent former editor, who come so late to the party, is endangering the last year of his government, in which he has so tenaciously focused on slogans ‘Beti Bachao’ aimed at improving his image among women.

The constituency

Modi recognised early on that ‘women’ could be a constituency. Swarms would sit right in front of every rally and he often addressed them through promises that would ease their hard lives – education, cooking gas and even a healthcare scheme. (The last one, especially, is expected to be a game-changer.)

Modi understood that happier homes in which the breeze lapped at the clothes-line that women have likely washed and the smokeless chulha on which women have likely cooked made for happier BJP voters.

But Modi has been careful about promising women the rose garden, thorns and all. He has never called for a revolution in sexual politics. Whether or not women are fair game is never the question. So-called ‘sex CD’ scandals in which BJP politicians have been allegedly linked quickly die a death. What happens inside the bedroom must remain inside the bedroom.

That’s why, despite such a handsome majority in the Lok Sabha, Modi will never take the Women’s Reservation Bill that Sonia Gandhi has kept alive for nearly a decade, and have it passed. It would be so easy for him to do. He will never do it.

So you can guess at the Prime Minister’s anger about the current, catalytic moment in which one of the smartest men in his government is in danger of being singed by a fire he started several years ago.

Modi’s problem is that he must now take a call on stopping the fire before it possibly engulfs his government.

That’s why he’s waiting for Akbar to return from his Africa yatra. The dice is loading against Akbar, as one senior Cabinet minister told me. Girl Number Eleven, @IndraniTalukdar, came out on Twitter Thursday to announce that she too had an ugly Akbar story.

The right thing

It would be so much easier of course if Akbar was a run-of-the-mill, pot-bellied, foul-mouthed politician with a yen for the young women. But he’s not.

As several journalists who worked with him over the years, including those he sexually assaulted, have vouched for, his golden pen, which slid over the page so easily and evoked the emotions the words were designed to evoke, was unique. Akbar was a rockstar editor who wrote the best columns, commissioned the best reportage and converted an upstart newspaper, The Telegraph, into an unputdownable product.

As fellow journalist S.N.M. Abdi says, “Akbar was a star, and we always hoped that some of that stardust would fall upon us.”

The flaw was always there for us to see. We saw and turned away. We didn’t want to see.


Also read: #MeToo in India should not forgive women who enable patriarchy and rape culture 


The irony is we now want Modi to do the job for us. To do what we, the women, should have done a long time ago. Imagine if Akbar hadn’t joined politics and had continued to be an editor preying upon women young enough to be his daughter.

But he is a card-carrying member of the BJP today and a member of Modi’s government. The PM must do the right thing by all of us. Akbar must go.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

4 COMMENTS

  1. Guilty must be punished. But accusations alone must not be allowed to be enough justification to ruin a person. It will be a disaster in both public and private lives if accusations are not investigated first to establish the facts. Unless evidence supporting the accusation is immediately available and staring at the face, one must await a decision from a court of law.

  2. It will be interesting for victims to decide the punishment for the perpetrators-lynching lashings stoning to death guillotine public hanging Castrastion Chopping

  3. It seems all people who have an axe to grind are levelling all kinds of allegations against MJ Akbar, fully knowing that their allegations cannot be proved except by Mr Akbar accepting them. Horror-struck, brutality, abuse, assault, etc all kinds of esoteric words are being put to use. Even incidents of offering tea or coffee is now being peddled as sexual assault. If courtesy is now shown, the person is called boorish and if he offers tea, it is given a label.

  4. For four and a half years, exceptionalism has been the order of the day. This is NDA, not the UPA; our ministers do not resign. The taper tantrum took place exactly five years ago. UPA II, already on its death bed, was faced with a powerful challenger. Karma being a pretty lady, all the things for which it was assailed, including a sagging rupee and surging fuel prices, are playing out today. What the opposition then made of various failings holds today as well, including ministers falling on their swords from time to time, for assorted misdemeanours. The party spokespersons who were so full of righteous indignation then are strangely reticent now, turning their face away. 2. The columnist judges Mr M J Akbar as a journalist; he may have been gifted. If one sees his record as a minister, difficult to understand what important work actually gets done in MEA. In the final Report Card, its achievements would barely merit a footnote. 3. There is an ethical dimension to this story, captured in a brief exchange of e mails between the father of the eighteen year old girl and Akbar, dated 2007. Read both to see the difference between a gentleman and a cad. The opposition will be very happy if he is not sacked or asked to resign. This issue will not blow over. One of many disappointments that will be judged harshly a few months from now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular