Former editor of Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal |STR/AFP/Getty Images
Former editor of Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal |STR/AFP/Getty Images
Text Size:

Five years after Tejpal was booked, he manages to keep stalling the case. No wonder women are disillusioned with the due process.

The raging #MeToo movement in India has many problems with it, just as it has been problematic in the US and elsewhere. The biggest problem is that it seeks to name and shame, destroy reputation and careers, without a due process.

The absence of a due legal process makes it open to misuse, and then there’s distinction denial. From an uncomfortable proposition to a rape, everything seems to be clubbed together. The punishment seems to be the same. It’s all getting muddled, and there seem to be more questions than answers.

Yet, it’s unfair to blame #MeToo for undermining due process because the due process has been undermined by the law itself. The law, as they say, is an ass.


Also read: #MeToo in India should not forgive women who enable patriarchy and rape culture


After the turning point of Nirbhaya in December 2012, everyone including the judiciary agreed there was a need for speedy justice in cases of rape. Laws pertaining to sexual harassment were strengthened. The Supreme Court’s Vishakha guidelines were formalised into a law on sexual harassment at workplace.

With lawyers like Tejpal’s

And yet, for all this movement, the system is still stacked against survivors. On 30 November 2013, Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal was arrested on charges of rape. Five years later, the trial in his case continues to be stalled. His army of high-profile lawyers manage to get the trial proceedings stalled for long periods by filing all sorts of applications.

Five long years later, Tarun Tejpal continues to game the system. It was only in 2017 that charges were formally framed in a Goa court. As recently as last month, the Supreme Court again stayed the proceedings in the trial court until 30 October.

Justice in the Tejpal case has been reduced to a farce. Tareekh pe tareekh, as the famous Bollywood dialogue goes. If this is how the law works in a high-profile case that caused public outrage, you can imagine what it must be like in nondescript cases.

Long before the #MeToo campaign, a woman journalist at Tehelka had the courage to speak up against a powerful editor. The law lets her down when the Supreme Court agrees to listen to Tejpal’s influential lawyers and grants a stay in the Goa trial court hearing. This is how serious the law is about giving justice to a woman whose bodily integrity was allegedly violated by a man in position of power.

Other women in the media see the incredible and inordinate delays in the Tejpal rape case, and it makes them cynical about the due process. There have been rape cases where judges have made unfortunate statements like ‘no can mean yes’. Fast-track courts remain vulnerable to being slowed down if the accused can hire fancy lawyers.

#MeToo is a legal emergency

Can you blame women for not trusting the due process? The legal procedure here becomes a punishment for the woman accuser.

We all need the due process – but does it even work? Taking legal recourse seems to be a greater punishment. If you are a man wrongly accused and defamed in #MeToo, you will think a hundred times before filing a defamation case. We all know the case won’t go anywhere, will only compound your trauma, will only make you run around the courts with tareekh pe tareekh, and cost you precious time and money.


Also read: #MeToo movement should not spare Indian NGO heroes and I am speaking out


It’s the same with women who are sexually harassed and assaulted. If #MeToo seems like mob justice, let it be a lesson on how we all need the due process to work. Let #MeToo make us all demand that the due process be fixed. Let us begin with the Tarun Tejpal case. If he’s not guilty, he deserves to be declared innocent pronto. Why do his lawyers keep running to the courts to delay the trial? Why does the Supreme Court keep agreeing to this demand?

The government, police and judiciary should all treat #MeToo as a legal emergency in India. #MeToo is only the symptom of the virus in the body politic of the law.

Does the ICC mechanism inspire confidence? 

Do the internal complaints committees (ICC) of party organisations really work? How many organisations, whether they are into news media or politics or Bollywood, actually have ICCs? Is anyone doing an audit? Do employees feel empowered to go to the ICC with a compliant? Do they feel they’d be heard fairly? Or, will they be penalised for daring to speak up against a powerful male boss?

Many organisations deal with the ICC requirement as just paperwork for legal compliance. If the ICC mechanism doesn’t inspire confidence among women, they will eventually send a message to a #MeToo champion one day with an office story from many years ago. Naming and shaming will happen. It’s because that’s the only recourse the due process left her with. If the due process fails us, it will lead to an ‘undue’ process like #MeToo.

Those championing #MeToo are not against the due process. They want it too. Except, it’s not there. The frustration with the absence of laws that actually deliver justice is such that #MeToo champions have come up with their own due process. They want women to identify themselves to other women so that there is some filter, and there may be some cross-questioning before a story is put out. This shows the internal reflection within #MeToo because obviously women also realise the problems with it.


Also read: India’s MeToo will succeed if our laws catch up with it


#MeToo is a loud scream for India to fix its due process. Governments and courts alike need to listen.

(This is an updated version of the piece)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

4 Comments Share Your Views

4 COMMENTS

  1. Shivamji, one point you have put very aptly that #MeToo is an “undue” process and you should have left it there. But you have gone on to state that those championing #MeToo are doing some kind of screening. Any such filtering has no meaning whatsoever, once the trend has been started any one can use the hashtag and post a complaint whether true or false.
    Your contention that #MeToo is getting massive response in India because of its poor legal system is unconvincing.

  2. The Print should have not just published this opinion piece, but should have backed it up by naming the lawyers and the judges who are a part of Tareekh pe Tareekh game. By not doing so, it has chosen the easy way out.

  3. Delay in getting justice is not specific to #metoo campaign. Victims in all spheres of life have been suffering since last seven decades. Situation unlikely to change because of our desire to hang and dry powerful people of India. Here a fast track court takes more than a year to deliver justice, which is followed by High Court and Supreme Court, appeal to president and the list goes on. Solution is having more judges, more courts and setting a time frame to complete each case. Which is not happening very soon.

  4. Two issues are getting mixed up here. 2. Me Too is valuable in itself. Not each case will be brought to trial. Many would be difficult to sustain in a court, especially those which are ten to twenty years old, there are no witnesses or corroborative evidence. The naming and shaming is serving a valuable purpose. All the pain and wrongdoing that was hidden from public view is coming out into the open. Suhel Seth has stopped tweeting. He will not be seen on many TV shows or literary festivals. Prince Charles will not meet him in London. Corporate clients with storied reputations will discontinue his retainership. Some journalists have lost their jobs. 3. I trust most of the women who are speaking up. It is evident not all transgressions are equally serious. It would be good for the movement if some vetting and screening takes place. Where a false accusation is made, colleagues who have known the person concerned are coming out to speak credibly in his defence. Of the several women who spoke up against Mr M J Akbar, the column written by Ms Ghazala Wahab in the Wire carried so much authenticity, it sealed his fate. Anyone with a smidgeon of common sense would realise this would not blow over. 4. If the ICCs are an eyewash, it would be in everyone’s interest if that changes. The bar is getting raised. It is only a matter of time before suits start getting filed, exemplary damages are awarded. 5. About Tarun Tejpal gaming the legal system with expensive lawyers, as Salman Khan has been doing all along, that is a great pity. One hopes some judge of good conscience in the apex court will put an end to this mischief. It may be cold comfort to the victim, but his life and career too have been upended.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here