Wednesday, February 1, 2023
HomeOpinionApart from Ram, the Supreme Court is BJP’s best friend in 2019

Apart from Ram, the Supreme Court is BJP’s best friend in 2019

Text Size:

Even die-hard Modi fans are not enthused with the performance of the government in the last four-and-a-half years.

As he readies the BJP for the 2019 general election, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a new ally, his strongest one yet – the Supreme Court of India.

In its timing to begin hearing politically-sensitive cases such as Ayodhya early next year, the top court may have unwittingly become part of the BJP’s grand scheme to polarise the voters and get their votes.

Similarly, the Supreme Court’s perceived urgency on hearing the Rafale case could actually end up working to the BJP’s advantage. Although it is difficult to guess the verdict in sensitive cases, if the Supreme Court rules there’s nothing wrong procedurally in the Rafale deal, it would effectively defang the main campaign issue for Rahul Gandhi and the Congress. In a single stroke, the Supreme Court can demolish the one big issue on which the Congress hopes to pin down Modi government ahead of the 2019 elections.

This perhaps explains why one of the most asked questions in political and bureaucratic circles is: Rafale par court kya karega (what will the Supreme Court do on Rafale)?


Also read: Supreme Court merely sniffing secret envelopes to see if there’s a scam in Rafale deal


While one doesn’t have the answer to this question, I can say with some degree of certainty that the hon’ble judges would be aware of the deep impact their ruling in the case might have on the outcome of the next year’s Lok Sabha elections.

The court will begin hearing the Ram Temple or Ayodhya case from January in this politically-charged environment. Everyone seems to have conveniently forgotten that there’s a mosque angle to the legal dispute too. As the Chief Justice-headed bench clarified, the bench will first decide the date from which regular hearings in the matter will begin.

Last week, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi decided that the review petitions in the Sabarimala case – if the court’s earlier judgment that all women, including those between the ages of 10 and 50, have the right to enter and pray at Kerala’s most famous temple is correct – will be heard from 22 January 2019.

The timing couldn’t have been more perfect for the BJP. The Hindutva lobby is already critical of the Supreme Court ever since the five-judge Constitution bench allowed women of all ages to enter the temple.

How can the court enter the religious domain of the Hindus? Will it have the guts to pass a similar order with regard to Christians or Muslims? These are questions often asked at small meetings organised by Hindutva groups.


Also read: BJP will hand Ayodhya victim card to every Hindu voter ahead of 2019 elections


When it refused to stay its verdict on Sabarimala and only agreed to hear the 48 petitions challenging the ruling, the Supreme Court inadvertently gave more oxygen to the Hindutva campaign.

I have already said that, having little to show by way of “vikas”, the BJP and the RSS seem to have decided to fight the next elections on the “victim” card – one where every voting Hindu will be repeatedly told that despite being a part of the majority, s/he is deprived of his/her rights as a Hindu. This, the BJP hopes, will ensure that majority of Hindus will vote as Hindus and not as Indians aspiring for a better India in the 2019 elections.

As part of this game plan, the BJP and various Sangh offshoots have already started asking the voters why the Supreme Court is not ready to decide the Ram Temple issue on priority despite India being a Hindu Rashtra.

From mid-December, when the Supreme Court-fixed deadline for filing of claims and objections for inclusion of names in Assam’s National Register of Citizens (NRC) ends, politics over the contentious issue will also heat up.

And, there’s no guessing which party will reap benefits by politicising these issue.

With even die-hard Modi fans and BJP workers are not exactly enthused with the performance of their government in the last four and a half years, their best bet is the Supreme Court.

Any favourable verdict on Rafale – the court doesn’t even need to say that there’s nothing wrong with the pricing of the Rafale deal or whether due procedure was followed or not – will help the Modi government go to town. This will be a big leg up for the BJP’s 2019 campaign.


Also read: BJP latches on to another poll promise it may not be able to keep — expelling ‘infiltrators’


As for Ayodhya and Sabrimala, the timing of the hearing has ensured that the BJP will be in better position to exploit the top court’s position. My own guess is that the BJP will be happier if the Supreme Court doesn’t decide the Ayodhya matter before elections.

That is why, apart from Ram Lalla, the Supreme Court is perhaps the BJP’s best friend in 2019 elections.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

8 COMMENTS

  1. If people vote as Hindus and not as Indians , then India is under threat from RSS BJP duo. A country with one third of population reeling under poverty was fooled by fake promises ! Swiss bank , 15 lakh in account , Petrol at 40rs… The chain of lies is endless… BJP meanwhile built most modern party office worth 1000s of crores ! And india buying rafaele at thrice the price ! Indians with a brain know the direction of flow of money ! Gandhi family should save India as they had done since the freedom struggle.

    • Oh great Gandhis, please come save India! Everyone else is useless and has no brain, no courage, no honesty. Everyone is corrupt but the Gandhis. Please save India and its pseudo-secularism! Please!

  2. I doubt the apex court will render a verdict on Ayodhya before the general election is concluded. It is aware that this is a very emotive issue, potentially far more explosive in its impact than Sabarimala, which is tucked away in one corner of the country. The Court has merely said the issue will be taken up for consideration before an appropriate Bench in January 2019. That Bench will decide when to list the matter. In all fairness, the top judiciary ought not to be dragged into something of this nature. 2. On Rafale, first the procedural issue and then, perhaps the pricing issue. On this matter, the Supreme Court will be colour blind to the electoral calendar, will go strictly, scrupulously by the documents placed before it. It does now appear that the 36 aircraft that Rafale is manufacturing for the IAF are virtually identical to the model that was test flown in India during the tenure of the previous government and that their technical specifications are exhaustively listed in the RFP issued in 2007 to six potential suppliers, one of whom was kind enough to share a copy with Col Ajai Shukla. 3. On the NRC, the apex court needs to proceed with caution. There are people living in detention camps already, about 20 excludees have committed suicide, ethnic violence has returned to Assam after a long time. Bangladesh, a good friend, is not taking kindly to the sentiments being expressed by some. The idea that Hindu immigrants are welcome, not Muslim ones is stirring anger in the state. 4. Why are “ die hard fans “ feeling let down, and what do others who are not feel about the justification for a second term ? A party that wishes to rule unbroken for fifty years needs to be delivering exceptionally good governance and faster economic growth. It had the legislative majority, a comatose opposition, a docile media, no worthwhile opposition from any quarter. If Hindus are not in fact feeling victimised, it will be a stretch to create such an emotion on a subcontinental scale. Many governments have come and gone, their achievements and failures have become part of the nation’s collective institutional memory. That helps voters make up their minds. Keep the narrative simple.

  3. I have already said that, having little to show by way of “vikas”, This is your view. This may not be the view of lakhs of people who got Bank accounts opened, Gas cylinders, Electricity, Roads ,houses and toilets. You may peddle your view as view of citizens but that is far from true.

    • Exactly .. these guys are agenda peddlers.. they should not be called journalists by any one.

      • Agree with both of you. These illogical journalists lack critical analytical skills (or is it intentional?). They don’t come out with data but just keep on recycling their own opinion in some form or the other and keep churning out one article (is it really an article?) after the other.
        Thanks to Internet and educated youth, their bias is getting exposed every day – very happy about that.

Comments are closed.