Why should everything be reduced to the binary of Halal and Haram? It’s pop Islam—faux piety, driven by pseudo-Islamic power theology that seeks to paint the world in garish green.
A day before he was to be sentenced for anti-Islamic activities, Momika was killed in his apartment in Sweden by assailants who entered his room while he was live-streaming on TikTok.
Denmark and Sweden have seen a string of protests in recent weeks where copies of the Quran have been burned, or otherwise damaged, prompting outrage in Muslim countries.
The fundamental distinguishing feature of an Islamic bank is its adherence to Sharia. No interest or investment in businesses that are deemed unlawful by Islam.
Thursday's demonstration was called by supporters of Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to protest against the second planned Koran burning in Sweden in weeks.
The resolution was strongly opposed by the United States and the European Union, who say it conflicts with their view on human rights and freedom of expression.
In a seminal work, former military officers Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda & Lt. Col. Pavithran Rajan put forth a framework to approach cognitive warfare, called Socio-Technical-Cognitive Battlespace.
India, China and Russia share more contradictions than congruence. Each has a different worldview, as also a different adversary. The rude fact is that BRICS is the most irrelevant of all such groupings.
For your attention, kanthapuram’s speech is not misogynistic. It is explicit by his comparison. The great destruction as he mentioned will not be done by women, but will be by men if unrelated women are among random men. That’s the crux of his speech. And the public sphere matter, for which examples were quoted from the wives of prophet is to know that the hijab, was mandated after many years of establishment of Islam. And it is not a command to follow when Islam was in its childhood. It came to process after umar (ra) pleaded prophet to order women(especially prophet’s wives)to cover them, because random men are visiting him, we don’t know about their intentions. And for your kind information khadija (ra) had her own employees who went to expand her business.(prophet is one among them). Aisha (ra) who taught many of the companions was not sitting among them as her husband (pbuh) did, but behind curtains. But these are not testimonies against women that they shouldn’t appear in public spheres, but where men are dominant.
This is the thing probably he is coming to say. In contemporary world, mingling is so normalised and clothing, especially muslim men and women are following the trend, not the teachings. There should be regular remembrances of their practices which is must to be a healthy society, atleast for muslims.
These things are not told for oppressing women, but for their safety. Men and women are equal as they all are children of hawwa (alaihassalaam) and Aadham (alahisalaam).
I have read bit on Fatima al-Fihri and she seems like prolific person during those times. However, no exaggerated claims are necessary to make a point of her greatness.
To claim that it was a place of higher education as we know it, does a disservice to her. In fact there seems to be a dispute on dating to ascertain if university like education was imparted when she was alive. But yes, education in some form was imparted during her time, when the place was still a mosque- that in itself is makes the point clear on the remarkable contribution of women, who in this case was muslim.
Please give it a read.
For your attention, kanthapuram’s speech is not misogynistic. It is explicit by his comparison. The great destruction as he mentioned will not be done by women, but will be by men if unrelated women are among random men. That’s the crux of his speech. And the public sphere matter, for which examples were quoted from the wives of prophet is to know that the hijab, was mandated after many years of establishment of Islam. And it is not a command to follow when Islam was in its childhood. It came to process after umar (ra) pleaded prophet to order women(especially prophet’s wives)to cover them, because random men are visiting him, we don’t know about their intentions. And for your kind information khadija (ra) had her own employees who went to expand her business.(prophet is one among them). Aisha (ra) who taught many of the companions was not sitting among them as her husband (pbuh) did, but behind curtains. But these are not testimonies against women that they shouldn’t appear in public spheres, but where men are dominant.
This is the thing probably he is coming to say. In contemporary world, mingling is so normalised and clothing, especially muslim men and women are following the trend, not the teachings. There should be regular remembrances of their practices which is must to be a healthy society, atleast for muslims.
These things are not told for oppressing women, but for their safety. Men and women are equal as they all are children of hawwa (alaihassalaam) and Aadham (alahisalaam).
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thankyou
I have read bit on Fatima al-Fihri and she seems like prolific person during those times. However, no exaggerated claims are necessary to make a point of her greatness.
To claim that it was a place of higher education as we know it, does a disservice to her. In fact there seems to be a dispute on dating to ascertain if university like education was imparted when she was alive. But yes, education in some form was imparted during her time, when the place was still a mosque- that in itself is makes the point clear on the remarkable contribution of women, who in this case was muslim.
Raoul, the leader of the party that rules Keralam, shall opine. Keep watching.