scorecardresearch
Friday, April 26, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomePoliticsSC didn't go into technical aspects of Rafale, only JPC can probe...

SC didn’t go into technical aspects of Rafale, only JPC can probe irregularities: Congress

Follow Us :
Text Size:

The Congress claimed the Modi government had misled the Supreme Court by presenting wrong information about the CAG report on the Rafale deal.

New Delhi: The Congress said Saturday the Supreme Court, which gave the government relief in the Rafale jet case, has not gone into the pricing and technical aspects of the aircraft and it is only a joint parliamentary committee that can probe whether there was any irregularity in the deal.

At a press conference, Congress leader Kapil Sibal pointed to a part of Friday’s judgment in which the Supreme Court said the material placed before it shows the Centre did not disclose in Parliament the pricing details of the fighter jet but revealed it to the Comptroller and Auditor General.

The apex court also said the CAG report was even examined by the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament.

Reacting to this, Sibal said Mallikarjun Kharge, the chairman of PAC, has said he never received any such report on Rafale jet.

“Who is responsible for this? Who said this? It was the government who said this. How did the attorney general pass the affidavit?” he said.

He also rebuked the government for not reading its own affidavits.

“This is a very serious matter and there should be an action in this case because the message among people is that CAG has cleared and Parliament has seen the deal, which is wrong,” he said.

Sibal said the court has neither gone into pricing nor into the technical aspects of the deal.

“Then how can they say that the Supreme Court has given a clean chit to the government. If you (the government) have not given the evidence, nothing, if the cross-examination has not happened then who gave you a clean chit. Only a JPC, which will be formed sooner or later, can probe this,” he said.

Earlier Saturday, Kharge said he will request all members of the panel to summon the attorney general and the CAG to ask them when was the public auditor’s report tabled in Parliament.

The Congress leader accused the government of “misleading” the court by presenting wrong information about the CAG report on the Rafale deal and demanded that the government should apologise for it.

In relief to the Modi government, the Supreme Court Friday dismissed the pleas challenging the deal between India and France for procurement of 36 Rafale jets, saying there was no occasion to “really doubt the decision making process” warranting setting aside of the contract.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

2 COMMENTS

  1. 1. As a citizen, I wish to know this: Is the Congress party against Rafale deal as negotiated by BJP or is it against the price of aircrafts or does it want more disclosure about contract with Rafale? 2. With regard to Rafale aircrafts deal, the Congress President has made serious allegations against PM Shri Narendra Modi and the NDA government. Citizens are unsure as to what will be the Central government’s response after possible and probable change in power in the Centre after Lok Sabha election in 2019. 3. Citizens think that (a) Congress President Rahul Gandhi wishes to make use of allegations of corruption to seize power and (b) that the Congress is not at all serious about curbing corruption in defence deals. Citizens wish that Rahul Gandhi should make a public announcement about what the Congress led government would do about Rafale deal, assuming that UPA govt. comes to power after 2019 Lok Sabha election. Would the Rafale deal be renegotiated, or would it be cancelled?

  2. I have read the 29 page judgment. It seems a superficial overview of a very complex issue. The unfortunate mix up over the CAG / PAC robs it of gravitas.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular