Gandhi and Madan Mohan Malaviya | Wikimedia Commons
File photo | Gandhi and Madan Mohan Malaviya | Wikimedia Commons
Text Size:

Although Gandhi described himself as a sanatani (true or pure) Hindu, he had nothing in common with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) which believed in equating Hindu interests with Indian interests. As Rajmohan Gandhi says, on the ‘crucial questions of Indian nationhood—Hindu–Muslim relations, militarization, the use of violence, and an Indian flag—the RSS ideology was…fundamentally opposed to Gandhi’s’.

Gandhi was a great enthusiast for cow protection and would preside over many campaign meetings of the Cow Protection Society; yet he refused to use cow protection as a bargaining chip for his support to the Khilafat Movement. He had a long-time and respectful personal relationship with Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya, Lala Lajpat Rai and Swami Shraddhananda—the chief spokesmen of Hindu interests and the main forces behind shuddhi (purification) and sangathan (consolidation) movements among the Hindus and a ‘partial ideological rapport’ with them.


Also read: Welfare of all animals matters, but cow is central, says Animal Welfare Board chief


He had described Malaviya as ‘a great leader of India’ and ‘the patriarch of Hinduism’. Gandhi had attended the inaugural meeting of the Hindu Mahasabha in Hardwar in 1915, and he maintained contacts with the Arya Samaj and its educational organization, the Gurukuls. Quite understandably, he wanted to carefully nurture a base for himself within Hindu organizations. Yet, while he went a great length with them, he could not go the whole length.

Gandhi had his own view of Hinduism which was founded on an amalgam of reason and belief within which the former was more prominent than the latter. It was not always in tune with orthodox Hindu leaders and organizations. Whether speaking at Gurukul organizations or at cow protection meetings, Gandhi would often strike a critical and discordant note. He believed and pointed out that Gurukul education was deficient in many respects and advised the Arya Samajists to introduce training in agriculture, handicrafts and sanitation.


Also read: We can’t talk about Gandhi if we don’t speak up on Kashmir and lynchings


On cow protection, which was dear to his heart, he was quite candid in accusing the Hindus of hypocrisy, for while they condemned cow slaughter by the Muslims and were ready to go to any length for stopping this, they often maltreated their cattle and sold them to the Muslims. He disagreed with Malaviya and others on the question of shuddhi and sangathan, for he did not believe that ‘the Indian National Congress, despite Hindu majority, could not be taken to protect Hindu interests, and therefore, separate communal organizations like the Hindu Mahasabha and Sangathan are absolutely necessary’.

In his efforts to court Hindu leaders and organizations, his goal was to make them more malleable and accommodative to the Muslims and to encourage them to develop a tolerant, non-violent and inclusive approach to public issues and questions rather than to give in to their stance.

This excerpt from Gandhi and the Ali Brothers: Biography of a Friendship by Rakhahari Chatterji, 2013, has been published with permission from SAGE India. Paperback: Rs 825

 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Share Your Views

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here