A woman checks the Facebook Inc. site on her smartphone | Chris Ratcliffe | Bloomberg
A woman checks the Facebook Inc. site on her smartphone | Representational image | Chris Ratcliffe | Bloomberg
Text Size:

In the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the French parliament has passed a law that makes it mandatory for social media and technology companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google to remove hateful content within 24 hours of being flagged by users. If the content pertains to terrorism and child pornography, it must be removed “within one hour”. Failure to comply could end in these companies facing fines of up to $1.36 million.

It is time India does something similar. I suggest this knowing fully well that such a law is prone to misuse. Governments in India could use it to throttle free speech, censor unfavourable content, and stifle rightful dissent. At the very least, most law enforcement agencies have stopped functioning independently and now work instead like an extension of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is in power at the Centre and in many states.

But while these are legitimate concerns, there is also a grudging acknowledgment that a law against hate speech and communal content is absolutely necessary in these sharply polarised times.  


Also read: BJP MP shares old video of Muslims offering namaz, Delhi Police say verify before posting


Firms won’t act, need a law

In their carefully crafted agenda to divide India on communal lines, the hate-mongers, often part of a shadowy IT cell of one or the other political party, use social media to spew venom against members of the minority communities or, when it suits their agenda, against the majority community.

And expecting the social media firms to do a clean-up on their own will probably remain a dream.

If the self-regulation was strong, a 31-year-old man wouldn’t have been able to run several fake accounts on Facebook for years, posing as a woman and posting bigoted comments aimed at dividing Hindu and Muslim communities. It’s the same with Facebook-owned WhatsApp, which won’t crack down on hate videos, including those related to mob lynching, many of which are edited to disturb peace.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

The reason is simple: Hate and bigotry run deep in Indian society and have a huge audience, which means more money for these companies. Also, fake news or a video clip targeting minorities generates lakhs of views and shares on Facebook and Twitter but fact-checking reports debunking them find fewer audiences.

For far too long, the internet biggies have been making billions by ignoring the unscrupulous elements using their platforms to weaken India’s social fabric. It’s time to pull the plug on this endless profiteering from hate.


Also read: Facebook apologises for its role in Sri Lanka’s 2018 anti-Muslim riots


How can it be done?

Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act exempts intermediaries like Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter from liability in most circumstances, including if the intermediary did not put out the content and had observed due diligence while discharging duties under the Act.

This way, the tech giants are allowed to get away without even a rap on the knuckles, notwithstanding the fact that the material posted on their platform may have resulted in communal riots or deaths.

But these companies can be held liable for any unwarranted content if, despite adequate notice, it is not removed within 36 hours from their servers. At a time when everyone with a smartphone, from bureaucrats and politicians to a common person, is a self-styled ‘news broadcaster’ happily spreading (mis)information, 36 hours is like a decade. The duration would ensure the damage is already done.

Most of these tech companies claim to have put in place in-house systems to check the misuse of their platforms, but the so-called checks and balances are often found lacking in their speed of response.

In 2018, the Narendra Modi government announced that it was planning to amend Section 79 of the IT Act and make it mandatory for internet companies to take down content deemed inappropriate by authorities and also trace and report within 72 hours of the origin of that content. But after concerns over privacy, the plan was dropped. 


Also read: Will the Facebook ‘Supreme Court’ make FB and Instagram a safer place?


Identifying the source

Anonymity, which is enjoyed by users of social media platforms, is one of the main reasons the unscrupulous elements among them are able to get away with virtually everything.

But these companies should now be asked to follow the post office model, where they know the source of an offending message, just like we know about our letters and parcels.

Also, with an unchecked rise in hate mongering and abuse, mostly from shadowy supporters and workers of India’s mainstream political parties, the victim should have the right to know the identity of the person who started the vicious campaign against her/him.

One way to ensure that the central and state governments don’t misuse a law against hate speech is by having strict guidelines such as allowing only the victims to get a formal response from the intermediary about the point and source of origin of the hate message or fake video targeting them.

A former National Cyber Security Coordinator in the Prime Minister’s Office had told tech giants and senior government functionaries a few years ago that one way to check offending messages, particularly hate speech and communally sensitive material, from being uploaded on social media could be for these sites to find a way to weed out anonymous users.

His suggestion went unheeded. It is time for someone to make the tech giants either find a fair, transparent way to do this or start paying for vitiating the atmosphere. Otherwise, fake news or malicious content on social media will continue to divide India society while politicians reap the benefits of this division.

The author is a senior journalist. Views are personal. 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

10 Comments Share Your Views

10 COMMENTS

  1. This will be used as a pretext bybMSM to target social media as social media has ruthlessly exposed them for their doubles peak.

  2. Why free speech no longer convinient.All the while journalist were lecturing free speech ,freedom and all nonsense.So much for liberal democracy.What about the safety valve argument of mah lord.It was never about freedom of speech ,governace .Now that this instruments are left useless you feel powerless so now there to protect free speech the journalist is supporting authoritism.Bloody hypocrites.Its always about religion and power.

  3. Should newspaper and online media outlets not be held to account also in that case. You cannot cry freedom of speech when the media outlets peddle the narrative of one party or another. In fact, journalists brazenly shill for political parties, post fake news, and spread blatant falsehoods from their privileged positions. How come they are completely free to do this but intermediaries are supposed to have responsibilities on social media networks?

    If anything, content on media outlets is carefully curated to present falsehoods, ignore inconvenient news, and thus should be held far more liable. You cannot demand freedom of the press to push the agenda of a few elite but then turn around and demand controls on the general population and their enablers for their views.

    • They are biggest frauds at least politicians can be changed by elections this people are totally unaccountable but wield so much influence and power in society.Journalist and bureaucrats are real power centre’s who are the only constants in system.Effective mechanism should be set up to hold them accountable to people.

  4. What if the one vitiating the environment and dividing the society is from the government?? Do you expect them to create a law that will stop them from doing their communal politics??

  5. We recall and remember the divisive and hate spreading agenda of the Main Stream Media, in the selection and reportage of communally sensitive incidents since Independence, blaming the majority community for everything. Unfortunately this is continuing even now. Then came the saviour in the form of social media, to exchange the correct news and views. There will be a few cases of misuse, but not to the extent and scale of the Main Stream Media, which has been coopted by the radical left and other Muslim appeasing governments. The spread of social media is so pervasive, that no one believes MSM anymore. This will continue till they redeem themselves, by accepting the errors of their way.

    • Lol… You’re a next level gobarbhakt!!!
      Social media memes cannot replace facts and reality. But your infamous IT cell is always working overtime to control the social media narrative.

      • FACTS and REALITies are now manufactured in the labs of LIBRANDUS. Better you get tuned to the emerging time where fakeness is part of life.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here