India’s most fascinating, controversial and the best networked politician turns 77. Such is his charm, rival BJP (under Modi) gave him the Padma Vibhushan. And a surprise: as defence minister, he opened the forces to women.
In the run-up to the 2009 national election campaign, when Prakash Karat was taking away the UPA’s allies and collecting all anti-Congress forces under one tent with Mayawati as their PM candidate, the Congress’s most loyal ally, Sharad Pawar, caused it some panic by saying it was still possible to have the Left back as an ally. Was he defecting to Maya-Karat? Was he positioning himself at some equidistant vantage point anticipating a hung Parliament? Or was he just being Sharad Pawar?
Now, there isn’t a better reader of his fellow politicians’ minds than Pranab Mukherjee. Asked what to make of Pawar’s latest, he said, “Sharad Pawar always gives mixed signals”.
There couldn’t be a sharper description for Pawar, one of the most fascinating political players of his generation. Ask his bitterest rivals, and they will tell you they have no friend like him to count on, but personally. A real yaaron ka yaar. In politics, whether of power or cricket, he takes no prisoners, and if he occasionally does, follows no Geneva Convention. Do check with Jagmohan Dalmiya, Lalit Modi and Suresh Kalmadi.
No one I have known in our politics has Pawar’s ability to keep the personal and the political apart. It is as if he was born with a Great Wall in his head, or a circuit breaker that trips the moment the two intersect. The only other name that would come close would be the late Chandra Shekhar. He had more charm but not the resources of Pawar, the man with the widest network of friendships and IOUs in our politics.
Before any election, you’d find him talking to everybody, swearing by his secular commitment, saying emphatically he will never join the BJP. But then, also remember his favourite line: nobody is untouchable. He loves to keeps his allies on the edge.
Pawar is secular to the extent of being an atheist, which is saying a lot for a man who has endured two rounds of surgery, one more radical than the other, chemo and radiation for oral cancer. Exactly like his friends in the Left and DMK, and Chidambaram and Antony in Congress, he takes his oath of office not in the name of God, but by “solemnly affirming”.
I first got to know him in the early 1990s when he was P.V. Narasimha Rao’s defence minister and drew immediate suspicion as he talked of gentrifying sprawling but rotting old cantonments and putting their surplus land to better use. Here comes a man who knows more about Bombay’s real estate than you and I know about our living rooms, and he now wants defence land!
I myself made the odd smart-alecky joke about it. At a dinner, I “warned” a Pakistani envoy to not even dream of going to war with India now. “After every war so far, you got your territory back from us after ceasefire,” I said. “But not now. By the time we exchange maps, Pawar would have sold the land to builders who would in turn have sold Pakistan View Apartments to buyers.” It was a cheap shot, but nobody minded. Such was the folklore about Pawar. In fairness, though, he was correct, effective and thoughtful, drawing his inspiration from his mentor Y.B. Chavan, who had rebuilt our forces after 1962.
In his very short tenure, Pawar instituted one landmark change for which nobody gives him credit, opening up the armed forces to women. It is tempting to speculate that it could be because his only child is a daughter, but he was always ahead of his time on gender correctness. He legislated property rights for women in Maharashtra and gave them 33 per cent reservation in local body elections.
Pawar had challenged Rao for prime ministership and lost. Yet, when Bombay burned after the Babri Masjid demolition in end-1992, Rao counted on him to return and restore order, which he brilliantly did. Soon enough, Bombay was hit by a bigger crisis, the serial blasts of March 1993, and he was up to scratch. He later made a disclosure to me in a 2006 on-record interview that he had deliberately lied to control the situation that afternoon, saying that bombs had gone off in a Muslim-dominated locality as well. Thus he confused, if not calmed, angry Hindus and Sainiks, giving his police time to take control.
We saw him go up and down, particularly after he broke away from the Congress and set up his Nationalist Congress Party. But as a rare UPA minister to hold the same portfolio for 10 years, he proved a much, much better agriculture minister than the Congress would ever give him credit for. While the povertarian Congress discourse perpetuated the farmer distress and suicide story, the sector actually saw remarkable growth, averaging about 3 per cent over the decade. If Manmohan Singh writes a candid memoir, he’d also tell you Pawar was his most loyal, reformist ally in the cabinet, stoically putting up with frequent humiliations by Congress.
How does this description of secular, patriotic and astute square with the more infamous aspects to his image? Corrupt, the richest politician in India, Asia or anywhere in the world. Can such a complex image be all fiction? His close friend and senior party leader D.P. Tripathi believes Pawar is being made to pay, unfairly, for his generous nature and lifestyle. Stories of him helping political rivals are legion and the amounts supposedly involved are then squared or cubed in the gossip machine. Unlike our hypocritical political class in general, Pawar is not particularly austere. He is a lavish host, a happy guest and his farmhouse in Baramati is a real mansion. But in that republic of his, he is also a god. Drive through Pawarland, you will find his portraits along with Ganesha and other gods in barber shops and tea stalls.
In 2009 (when Pranab Mukherjee made his “mixed signals” remark), West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee asked Tripathi to describe Pawar. “I told him, he is India’s only genuine bourgeois leader,” Tripathi says. Later when he recounted this to Pawar, “he said, arrey, you call me bourgeois?” Tripathi told him it was a compliment as that is what India needed, to break its feudal politics.
He recalls how, at a recent function in Parliament, Narendra Modi himself walked up to greet Pawar and complained why he wasn’t coming to see old friends like him. “That is what I mean by bourgeois, actually, zameen se juda hua leader,” Tripathi says. “Sonia and Rahul would never do this.”
I know he has been seething with the Congress for a long time. Particularly for singling him and his party out for the humongous corruption in his home state. His NCP was no angel, but he has a point when he says that the urban development portfolio, which is like a mint and not just an ATM in Maharashtra, has always been with the Congress, along with the chief ministership, so look who is talking.
The political reporter in me is fascinated by his ever-changing moves. But if I were to be a pure analyst, I’d say his signals are mixed but have one predictable element: he’d stay secular, but would love to be needed by the largest single party or group. He will live by his most durable principle: nobody is untouchable.
I am not from Maharashtra but I adore Mr. Pawar. He doesn’t extol his virtues like 56″ man who claims to have born to save India.
He may be described in a sentence” a man dreaming of prime ministers post having mentality of a bugger. The great scamster, clever person who can beat any politician in divide and rule theory. It’s a pity that poor illiterate people regard this bloody fellow which he doesn’t at all deserves. Otherwise this should be a very good article which can be published after his death which is awaited by many Maharashtrians. Take my word, if this pig was not born in Maharashtra, the state would have surpassed Singapore hands down
Mr.Sharad Pawar in my view is only the person who is liable to become PM.I really feel sorry to see he being blamed of corruption ,when he was never pointed in any damn, scam throughout his such a long political career.Only thing he is made”badnam” by some Urban antimaratha journalists.To be more truthful he is the only one leader in present Indian politics who could balance Urban and rural India equally.
How is “he gives mixed signals” a sharp comment? It means neither Pranab nor the writer could figure him out! I m not sure why everyone is enthralled by how corrupt he is in real estate. This amount of wealth accumulation using power is usually called a fraud – so don’t understand why the writer is so indulgent of his ill gotten wealth. It takes brains to scam, but must we elevate those brains and cleverness to wisdom? How is BJP giving him Bhushan after calling him corrupt so amusing? It’s top notch hypocrisy. Why is 3 pc growth of agriculture sector so alluring if a record number of farmers have killed themselves? And finally, what is the point of including women in defence if he didn’t even feel secure about having a lady boss just because she was born Italian? It’s called something, xenophobic I think. And great, big favour he did on everyone by being secular: that is commendable in these times where basic expectation is that you don’t kill minorities. But really. How much will you rationalise under the garb of changing an areas skyline? It’s not even funny.
3% agricultural growth – look at how Radha Mohan Singh performs as the incumbent agricultural minister?
One question remains of the great man’s legacy. Will the NCP retain its identity after him, or will it be absorbed by the Congress, with which it shares so much of its DNA ? And will leadership pass to nephew or daughter ? 2. Sharad Pawar was 38 when he broke away from Vasantdada’s cabinet and formed his all party government, which in his mind may serve as the model for a similar formation in Delhi, with him as PM. He could not have foreseen how Mrs Gandhi would return to power so soon, dismissing his government and sending him into the wilderness, till her son brought him back into the fold. 3. Keeping one’s options open may be a good strategy, but Mr Pawar’s golden years have always been with the Congress.
This is fantastic. Good attempt to describe Pawar but he is more than what is written here. No one can describe him in a single article.