Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionHow Vajpayee worked with leaders from rival parties to save the Sukhoi-30...

How Vajpayee worked with leaders from rival parties to save the Sukhoi-30 deal in ’96

Text Size:

The inside story of how IAF’s Su-30 dream would’ve crashed but for the sagacity of Narasimha Rao, Vajpayee, Jaswant Singh and Mulayam Singh Yadav.

This is a story from the summer of 1996. Some of you might remember (and the rest can Google) how a little controversy had started to build in the last days of the Narasimha Rao government when, with the election campaign in full swing, the Sukhoi-30 deal was signed with the Russians and, The Indian Express broke the story. There were immediate protests from the BJP. Rao’s was after all a caretaker government with the Election Commission’s model code in force.

There were dark insinuations, as it is usual with all defence deals: was Rao in a hurry to collect hundreds of crores for his campaign?

Then, surprisingly, the BJP stepped back. Because the facts were absolutely to the contrary. Somebody did indeed want money from the Sukhoi deal, but it wasn’t Rao.

Two weeks before the first round of the 1996 elections, I got a call one morning from Jaswant Singh to talk about the Sukhoi story.

What did I think about the deal, he asked. Did I suspect there was a scam, like Bofors? I told him I had heard no such thing and that my friends in the IAF thought this was a great aircraft. He then asked me if I would see Mr Vajpayee (then leader of the opposition) to talk more about this.

The same afternoon, I got a call from Vajpayee’s home to see him at breakfast the next morning. Vajpayee was lovingly and generously buttering a crisp toast and feeding it in small pieces to his favourite Pomeranian, while exploring the possibility of a campaign-time bonanza of a scandal bigger than Bofors.

Also read: A Lesson from the Vajpayee school of large-hearted leadership

His question, briefly, was as follows. The lame-duck Congress government had sealed the deal in its last days in an unseemly hurry. It was also his ‘information’ that the government had paid an advance of around $350 million to the Russians without any final price settlement. Why such an unusual rush? Did the Congress want to collect a kickback in the last, cash-and-carry phase of its government?

He said he had heard that the Express knew more about this, or if not, could I have it looked at more closely? He said his apprehension was that “if it is a good plane, unsubstantiated talk of a scam should not scuttle the deal”. At the same time, knowing the ways of the Rao government, and circumstantial evidence in the case, you naturally suspected a kickback.

We checked out our usual sources and suspects and it did not seem that the decision, though hasty, was mala fide. The BJP too kept quiet, Rao’s Congress was defeated anyway, and Vajpayee’s coalition government was sworn in, although the first time it lasted only 13 days.

It was towards the last couple of days of that government that Jaswant Singh called me to chat on the sidelines of a public function. “That Sukhoi story,” he said, “is actually nothing.” Having been in government now, they had been able to look at the files and it was a clean deal and the haste, if any, was in a larger national interest, so it would be better to forget all about it. He wouldn’t tell me what that ‘larger’ national interest was.

The scene now shifts to the IAF mess on New Delhi’s Zakir Hussain Marg, a few months later, and we pick up the thread of that Sukhoi story again. Now H.D. Deve Gowda’s coalition was in power and Mulayam Singh Yadav was the defence minister. His ministry had organised a dinner for him to meet senior editors at the IAF’s showpiece mess in Delhi. Mulayam’s defence ministry had just finalised the full Sukhoi order. I stole a discreet moment to ask him if he had looked at the Sukhoi deal closely, because it was signed by Rao in such haste, there was a large, arbitrary advance involved, and because the top leaders of the BJP were at one stage suspicious about it.

“I know, I know, Jaswantji and Atalji had brought this up with me,” he said. Then he went on to describe in detail how, before the final, full deal was signed, he had actually invited Vajpayee and Jaswant to South Block to have a detailed presentation on the deal given to them. He said they had suggested changes in the deal documentation, including the provision of a sovereign guarantee from the Russian government that no kickbacks were paid and, should any be discovered any time in future, they would reimburse the amount to the Government of India.

Then, Mulayam said with a lot of delight: “They came to my office, we settled everything, but you people never found anything out.”

That conversation ended with Mulayam telling me triumphantly, and repeatedly, “Dekha, media phail ho gaya (see, the media failed to find out).”

We had failed, alright, to break a marvellous story, of how arch-rivals Mulayam and the BJP had actually exchanged notes on such a sensitive issue behind closed doors. Though late, it was still a great story, I thought, and so asked the redoubtable Ritu Sarin, the head of the Express investigative bureau, to find out more.

Sure enough, she landed up at Jaswant Singh’s office to check. At which point I once again got an invitation to Vajpayee’s house. This time, the point was simple. Could the Express avoid this story please? Because if it was published, it might hamper “our ability to communicate across party lines even on issues of such sensitivity and national interest”. These are days of bitter, ideological politics, but governing India is serious business, he said, or something to that effect.

Also read: Modi speaks of the world as one family, Vajpayee showed us what it truly meant

Now, the mystery of what exactly that ‘larger’ national interest was that had led to such haste and a large advance payment in the last days of the Rao government. It seems that Boris Yeltsin had told Rao that he too was heading for elections, that the Sukhoi factory happened to be in his constituency, was too broke to pay salaries to its staff and if India could pay it that advance, salaries would be paid. It would work like magic in his election campaign.

That advance was, therefore, a political deal between the big boys, to be adjusted in the final pricing later. It was a conscious, diplomatic decision, cleared by Rao, and executed by none else than the then finance minister, Manmohan Singh.

Rao took an incredibly bold decision (given the Bofors background) which the BJP, locked in a bitter electoral battle with him, was suspicious of, but did not make an issue of, in the national interest.

When the BJP found the real reason (the Yeltsin request) they kept quiet — they in fact said Rao’s government had handled it masterfully. Then Mulayam Singh, whose entire politics is based on anti-BJPism, was large-hearted enough to open the files to its leaders and take their advice, again in the national interest.

In one story, therefore, you had the top leadership of all three major political groups — bitter enemies — involved. Yet they talked, shared confidences, and did the right thing by their nation. Now compare that with the lack of communication, even social graces, the general antagonism in our politics through this past month, and you know why that Sukhoi story is so relevant, and worthy of recall.

This article was originally published on 23 November, 2017

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Mulayam trusted Vajpayee’s and Jaswant’s wisdom and indiscretion, i guess. That is why he was comfortable with inviting them for a discussion.
    Well, in that context, i don’t think Modi trusts anyone in the opposition when it comes to wisdom – especially not Rahul baba.

  2. Prof PK Sharma,Freelance Journalist,Barnala (Punjab)

    Hats off to two great STARS and SOULS of India

    Their magnanimity, broadmindedness, intellect, humility and nobility spoke volumes of their greatness !
    They led the nation selflessly by setting wonderful examples and precedents of the exceptional order to
    be emulated not only by the Indians belonging to various walks of life but foreign dignitaries too !

    They were the lovable personalities on the world scene who commanded respect spontaneously instead
    of asking or yearning for the same !

    Shekhar Sahib, the present lot of leaders now at the helm of affairs should learn lessons from the rich
    treasure of the qualities of head and heart of these two in the best interests of the nation ! Yout write-up is
    full of exemplary, motivating and startling revelations of an episode featuring pan-India stalwarts !

    The Print has also indeed done remarkably well to bring into the limelight the tribute paid by Mr. Vajpayee
    to the first Prime Minister of India Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru on his demise on May 27, 1964 to clear the air
    and atmosphere !
    It should serve as an eye opener to “those who are stooping very low because of their parochial outlook !”

    Prof PK Sharma, Freelance Journalist
    Pom Anm Nest,Barnala(Punjab)

  3. If what is narrated is possible,there is future for India.All parties are concerned about and acting in national interest.

  4. On every occassion PV rose above party politics in the national interest. but unable to tolerate the madarassi at the whelm, delhi victimised him.

  5. This story is thrilling to read and my heart glows with pride to know that our politicians can rise above their bitterness for the sake of our great nation.

    And Guptaji, this reinforces the feeling that prior to SoniaG, Congress leadership was at least aware of something called national interest but thereafter the nation was sold. And you folks knowing all of this still support the anti-national forces and denigrate the nationalist ones at the drop of a hat. Why is that I wonder?

    • Prof PK Sharma,Freelance Journalist, Barnala(Punjab)
      Sujata Madam,
      We ought to be objective in our reactions !
      If Ms. Sonia Gandhi showed spirit of self-sacrifice by not accepting top most executive office of Prime Minister
      of India, did she sell the nation?
      If Congress under her stewardship committed blunders and blemishes, the electorate punished Congress very
      severely by rejecting it, shrinking its number to worst ever low to 44 in the annals of Lok Sabha Polls in 2014.
      Following this, Congress even failed to attain the Leader of Opposition status in the Lok Sabha !

      Nowadays, greed and lust for power is so much insatiable that seeing one hundred fifty persons losing their lives
      standing in queues for getting their own cash money in front of banks, mob lynching cases on the rise, not
      coming out clean on Rafale Aircraft deal and many more sensitive issues, you see how NaMo is feeling like a fish
      out of water eyeing second term in hot seat ?
      What will you call this megalomania of NaMo ? Is it nationalism ?
      NaMo in his homage to Mr.Vajpayee remarked : He was like a father figure to him !
      Is the son prepared to take even a single leaf out of the book of his father figure ?
      Did the son ever bother to follow his footprints all these more than four years or before when he was alive ?

      I feel words and actions of a public figure must match !
      Then desiring and deserving too must match !
      If these do not match what should we deem these, madam please think calmly and then answer ?

      Prof PK Sharma,Freelance Journalist
      Pom Anm Nest,Barnala(Punjab)

  6. Well, the Russians were really smart. Sure, Sukhoi su-30 is a nice aircraft. But, they got the advance, sealed the deal, never transferred any technology to India despite request (merely allowed the assembly in India which was more expensive than assembling in Russia). India’s indigenous ability to build advanced fighters never materialized. Only Lighter Tejas could be built, that too with, imported parts and engines. And, the T-50 FGFA prototype is riddled with tech transfer issues too. Not to mention, we paid few hundred millions to its design already.

  7. It’s obvious that where the ‘Family’ was not involved, National interest prevailed. What you see today is the INC at it’s worst, because the family is at it’s most precarious. Another point that comes out is that PVN Rao & AB Vajpayee were the best PMs we had. NaMo might join the list, too.

  8. Excellent piece… I’m sure even with all the ideological and sometimes personal differences in today’s politics nation still comes first.

  9. Brilliant story and sagacity of our leaders past and present. Bickering democracy aside, the issue of larger national interest will bring them together behind the scenes.

  10. This is truly great example of cross party collaboration in the national interest. We need more examples of the above collaboration in present scenario

Comments are closed.

Most Popular