Dalit activists protest against the alleged 'dilution' of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes act | PTI
Dalit activists protest against the alleged 'dilution' of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes act | PTI
Text Size:

Even OBC representation in higher bureaucracy is no more than 2.89 per cent; retired officers claim Dalits & tribals continue to face discrimination in career.

ThePrint is publishing articles on Dalit issues as part of Dalit History Month.

New Delhi: There are 81 secretary rank officers in the central government but only two are from scheduled castes and three from scheduled tribes, the government has said in response to an RTI application filed by ThePrint.

Overall, 9 per cent officers holding the rank of joint secretary and above belong to these two communities, the RTI reply said. The information comes amid a renewed debate over the abysmal representation of Dalits and tribals in the judiciary and bureaucracy.

The number of officers from the other backward classes (OBCs) is even fewer with nobody from these groups at the secretary or additional secretary level. At present, there are 13 OBC officers at the joint secretary level, making the OBC representation in the higher bureaucracy less than 3 per cent.

Factors behind low representation

Traditionally, the representation of SC/ST communities in the bureaucracy has been on the lower side.

Illustration by Siddhant Gupta

The RTI reply shows there are 451 officers in the ranks of joint secretary and above, which include 81 secretaries, 75 additional secretaries and 295 joint secretaries. Among these only 40 officers are from SC and ST communities.

Last year, minister of state for personnel, pensions and public grievances Jitendra Singh, in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha, had said that the number of secretaries from SC/ST communities was four.

According to 2011 census data, there were 20.14 crore people belonging to scheduled castes in India, making Dalits account for 16.6 per cent of India’s population. STs account for 8.6 per cent.

While there is no provision for reservation for SCs/STs in the posts under the Central Staffing Scheme (CSS), governments generally insist that at the time of empanelment, efforts are made to include officers belonging to SC/ST categories, if necessary, by adopting liberal benchmarks as compared to officers of general category. However, the consistently low representation of the communities in higher echelons of the bureaucracy states otherwise, argue Dalit bureaucrats.

Bias against Dalit/tribal officers?

While entry is ensured for Dalit and tribal bureaucrats in the system through reservation, they continue to face discrimination within the system, which remains dominated by upper castes at the decision-making level, claims Amar Singh, a retired IAS officer.

“The bias in the system doesn’t leave just because you’ve entered the system,” he said.

The ingrained bias against Dalit manifests at the time of postings and promotion, he claimed. While the number of Dalits at the secretary level is itself low, Singh argues that even the numbers do not grasp the bigger problem.

“Even when they are promoted to senior positions, it is never in the meaty, decision-making ministries,” he says. “Dalits and tribals will never be made secretaries in defence, finance, among others,” he added.

So pertinent is the problem of discrimination against Dalit bureaucrats that a number of them got together to form a WhatsApp group, “Common Cause”, wherein experiences of discrimination and ways to circumvent biases were discussed. While the group has now closed, its members still meet every now and then to discuss issues, Singh says.

In 2016, when Dalit scholar Rohith Vemula committed suicide, P. Sivakami, a former IAS officer, said she had quit in 2008 after being treated like “an untouchable” in the government.

“Both the political class and bureaucracy work together against the Dalits. During my service, though my position was next to the minister in the state I was serving in, I had to struggle for basic rights for tribals,” Sivakami whose last posting was secretary of the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department in Tamil Nadu, had told IANS.

“I was dubbed as a person who belongs to the community when I was working for their welfare. It amounted to untouchability. I realised that there was an unwritten law against people from the lower community,” she said.

While Dalit groups have been demanding reservations in promotions for a long time, no such provision exists at the central level. Last year, the Modi government had pleaded in the Supreme Court for providing quota in promotions for SC/STs in government jobs, urging the court for reconsideration of an earlier verdict holding against such reservation in promotions.

In 2006, the top court had said that in order to implement reservation in promotion, the state concerned “will have to show in each case the existence of the compelling reasons, namely backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency, before making provision for reservation”.

Read more from ThePrint’s Dalit History Month archives.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

VIEW COMMENTS

9 COMMENTS

  1. Quota by itself is not an answer for Dalit emancipation. We have had it for 70+ years for affirmative reasons. It has yielded limited results.

    It is high time we give them equal oppurtunity by making them fight equally. Instead of giving scholarship to study in a bad quality school enable them the choice of school thru RTE and subsidise their fees thru DBT.

  2. It’s a little pathetic that they are not able to get ahead inspite of reservations and relaxed liberal criteria for promotions. Maybe they are just not up to the mark

    • When I was growing up in armed force schools I never knew what caste means but my experience of working in government institutions has shown me how deep rooted caste is in the minds of the so called upper caste elites. Selection committee members have such deep biases against candidates coming from certain communities that their chances of selection or promotion are virtually nil. These observations led to the placement of observers in many such selection panels. Things have started to change especially for OBC communities but for SC/ST candidates it is still difficult. Why videography of the selection/promotion interviews cannot be done?

  3. Even after reservation this is the situation, think if there will be no reservation. They keep down majority of indians in all aspects.

  4. This article and the relevant RTI is nothing but fishing in troubled waters and is a mischief attempt…most of those in secretary levels are from 1980-83 Cadre…Has the author done any study as to how many SC ST OBC (who by the way were given reservations in 1989-92 only) were there in that batch…did you check whether how many of the General class became Secretaries? Before connecting this with Promotion and representation are you insinuating that any of these are unfit to be where they are? Yellow journalism at best…such articles are what makes one believe that there really is a break India project at work…shame

Comments are closed.