RSS-linked body Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas has appealed to the Narendra Modi government to alter the UPSC selection process and make it accessible to all.
Backing India’s stand on Jammu and Kashmir, French President Emmanuel Macron said it is a bilateral issue and no third party should interfere in the matter.
The Delhi High Court had called Chidambaram the “kingpin” in the case. High profile economic offenders like Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya have earlier fled India.
PM Narendra Modi Monday held his first conversation with US President Donald Trump on the Kashmir issue since the abrogation of Article 370 as well as the latter's offer to mediate.
Former Haryana CM and Congress leader Bhupinder Singh Hooda Sunday said his party has lost its way as he supported the Narendra Modi government’s move to abrogate Article 370.
Horizon 2047 signed during Modi's visit to France in July 2023 and the defence industrial roadmap during Macron’s visit to India in January 2024 guide the strategic bonhomie between the two countries.
In 2021, the government allowed telcos to convert interest on deferred spectrum payments and AGR dues into equity. This made it the single largest stakeholder in Vodafone Idea.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
Hair splitting apart, intolerance levels in India are rising faster than the flood waters in many parts of the country. Freedom of thought and speech is under severe threat.
Not one of these distinguished columnists has bothered to learn what was said in the courtroom. The judge started out by saying that none of these books are banned. He asked a question about the book in order to understand the intent of the defendant. We don’t know how the defendant responded but he could have said that it is not about war in another country or that it is about a collection of essays about Maoists. Can somebody please post the complete transcripts so we we can decide for ourselves? We don’t need opinions by people who didn’t bother to research the issue but are ready to issue opinions.
Not really but it does show up the media’s incompetence and proclivity to bark up the wrong tree. Time media gets its act together and a grip on facts. This time it even confused a book.
If people are seeking alternate political ideologies, then it means the current form of political system, democracy or baboocracy is impotent to meet their basic needs of life. If basic needs are met, where is the need to turn to violence for remedy? Civilian baboos and netas have consistently failed those people for seventy years. What happened to the promise of a democratic India? The rulers have changed, the system of oppression still remains the same. Why are the people still poor? How come baboos and netas have become disgustingly rich beyond imagination? Is the state of India truly serving the lowly Indian citizen? Everyone knows it’s a sham. We just don’t want to face the inconvenient truth. Indians never attained freedom.
A complete aversion to intellect. What if Mao’s Little Red Book was part of the collection. For a nuclear armed power, we seem extraordinarily diffident about our ability to keep ourselves safe. The higher judiciary is turning a little ambivalent towards being a fierce protector of the freedoms of the individual versus an all powerful state.
Hair splitting apart, intolerance levels in India are rising faster than the flood waters in many parts of the country. Freedom of thought and speech is under severe threat.
Not one of these distinguished columnists has bothered to learn what was said in the courtroom. The judge started out by saying that none of these books are banned. He asked a question about the book in order to understand the intent of the defendant. We don’t know how the defendant responded but he could have said that it is not about war in another country or that it is about a collection of essays about Maoists. Can somebody please post the complete transcripts so we we can decide for ourselves? We don’t need opinions by people who didn’t bother to research the issue but are ready to issue opinions.
Not really but it does show up the media’s incompetence and proclivity to bark up the wrong tree. Time media gets its act together and a grip on facts. This time it even confused a book.
If people are seeking alternate political ideologies, then it means the current form of political system, democracy or baboocracy is impotent to meet their basic needs of life. If basic needs are met, where is the need to turn to violence for remedy? Civilian baboos and netas have consistently failed those people for seventy years. What happened to the promise of a democratic India? The rulers have changed, the system of oppression still remains the same. Why are the people still poor? How come baboos and netas have become disgustingly rich beyond imagination? Is the state of India truly serving the lowly Indian citizen? Everyone knows it’s a sham. We just don’t want to face the inconvenient truth. Indians never attained freedom.
A complete aversion to intellect. What if Mao’s Little Red Book was part of the collection. For a nuclear armed power, we seem extraordinarily diffident about our ability to keep ourselves safe. The higher judiciary is turning a little ambivalent towards being a fierce protector of the freedoms of the individual versus an all powerful state.