scorecardresearch
Saturday, April 27, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeWorldChina downplays India's reported plan to boycott 2nd Belt & Road Forum

China downplays India’s reported plan to boycott 2nd Belt & Road Forum

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang said that the BRI initiative does not involve territorial and maritime disputes unlike what India has understood of it.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Beijing: China Monday played down India’s reported plans to boycott the upcoming 2nd Belt and Road Forum (BRF), saying India may have misunderstood the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and suggested New Delhi to “wait and see” before taking a decision.

The BRI is a multi-billion-dollar initiative launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping when he came to power in 2013. It aims to link Southeast Asia, Central Asia, the Gulf region, Africa and Europe with a network of land and sea routes.

China is expected to hold the 2nd BRF meeting from April 25 to 27 here. Beijing already said officials of over 100 countries besides 40 government leaders have agreed to take part in it.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a media briefing here that the BRI is an economic cooperation project and it does not involve territorial disputes.

“The Indian comments on not participating in the BRI for various reasons, I would like to say that the BRI is an open and inclusive economic cooperation initiative. It does not involve territorial and maritime disputes,” he said.

The USD 60 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which has been officially designated as a flagship project of the BRI, has become a stumbling block for India to take part in it as the controversial project is being laid through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

India has already protested to China over the CPEC violating its sovereignty and boycotted the first BRF held in 2017.

Asked for comments on India’s reported plans to boycott the 2nd BRF, Kang said, “Whether the Indian side will participate in the BRI forum, I think you need to ask India for a more specific answer.”

In BRI, China and other counties uphold the principle of equality, openness inclusiveness and transparency, he added.

“We follow market based principles and the customary international rules,” the spokesman said.

“I think may be some sides have misunderstandings on the BRI and thus have some wrong judgement. Please know that China follows principle of cooperation and consultation for shared benefit and that principles will not change,” he said.

Asked whether China is suggesting that India would miss out a lot by not participating in the event, Lu said, “the BRI has been an open and inclusive initiative for all countries and organisations interested in this”.

“But of course, if the relevant side would like to wait and see, we do not oppose that and as for the participation of international organisations in the BRF some countries losing out on opportunities, you may need to ask the countries that does not participate in the BRF,” he said.

Lu said BRI is already a success.

“I would like to re-emphasise that the BRI is proposed by China but it is already an international public good. The first BRF has been success and many practical outcomes were achieved. And now more international organisations and countries are participating in the BRI cooperation. I think it speaks volumes,” he said.

The BRF is being held to consolidate China’s trillion-dollar BRI to further its global influence by financing and building massive infrastructure projects throughout the world.

Indian Ambassador to China Vikram Misri has signalled India’s boycott of 2nd BRF as well by saying that “to be honest, we have made no secret of our views and our position on BRI is clear and consistent and one that we have conveyed to the authorities concerned.”

“Above all, connectivity initiatives must be pursued in a manner that respects sovereignty, equality and territorial integrity of nations. No country can participate in an initiative that ignores its core concerns on sovereignty and territorial integrity,” he told the state-run daily Global Times last month.


Also read: Pakistan, China can’t afford misadventures under BJP’s watch, says UP CM Adityanath


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

1 COMMENT

  1. At a future date, when there is more trust between the two sides, the issue could be reconsidered. India’s concerns on the status of PoK could be suitably addressed by way of formal protocols / caveats to the documentation. Equally important are concerns India has raised about the viability of projects, debt servicing becoming burdensome, etc. China has first hand experience of some of these fears coming true, with Sri Lanka, Malaysia, the Maldives. CPEC itself at the moment rests at $ 20 billion, one third of the initial planning, because Pakistan’s fragile economy cannot handle so much high cholesterol. Other things being equal, China would find many more viable projects to finance and execute in India than in Pakistan.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular