Friday, 2 December, 2022
HomeThePrint EssentialWhy ISIS bombed Kabul wedding and how it's eyeing the Afghan peace...

Why ISIS bombed Kabul wedding and how it’s eyeing the Afghan peace talks

ISIS claimed responsibility for bombing a wedding reception in Kabul last week. Tracking the rise of ISIS in Afghanistan and its objectives in the conflict-ridden country.

Text Size:

New Delhi: The dreaded terror group Islamic State, or ISIS, has sent a loud message to the world through the Kabul wedding blast, raising hard questions on the credibility of the US-led quadripartite peace talks which is in its concluding phase now.

On Sunday, the ISIS claimed responsibility for bombing a wedding reception in Kabul that left 63 people dead a night before, in what turned out to be one of Afghanistan’s worst terror attacks in the recent past.

The claim led Afghan President Ashraf Ghani to vow to “eliminate” ISIS bases across the country during the country’s 100th Independence Day celebrations Monday.

In a speech to his nation, Ghani stated a “firm commitment to fight against Daesh (Islamic State group) and other terrorist networks until they are utterly smashed”.

“We will take revenge for every civilian drop of blood… Our struggle will continue against (ISIS), we will take revenge and will root them out,” said Ghani.

The Taliban, which is a part of the peace talks, questioned the failure of the US in pre-empting Saturday’s attack. In a strongly-worded statement, it said “leave Afghanistan to the Afghans”.

With anger mounting in Afghanistan over the latest ISIS attack, ThePrint tracks the group’s rise and objectives in the conflict-besieged country.

Rise of ISIS in Afghanistan

In a report to the Congress, the US Department of Defence in June said the US efforts against ISIS-K in Afghanistan are part of the global endeavour to defeat ISIS.

ISIS-K — Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan Province — is a wing of the terror group that has become active in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the last five years.

“ISIS-K poses a threat not only to Afghanistan, but also to the West, which it continuously seeks to target for terrorist activity. In addition to the internal threats, powerful regional actors surround Afghanistan. These powers have varied interests in the political, military, and economic future of Afghanistan,” the report said.

It added that the ISIS-K maintains the capability “to conduct mass casualty attacks with the intent to weaken public support for the Afghan Government and the Taliban”. The group continues to “evade, counter, and recover from sustained CT (counter-terrorism) and combat pressure to maintain its territorial safe-haven in eastern Afghanistan, from which it plans attacks and spreads its ideology to displace al-Qa’ida and the Taliban as the predominant regional militant group”, the report said.

Titled Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan, the report noted that ISIS-K remains limited to South and Central Asia.

It also highlighted that the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region remains a sanctuary for various groups, including the Taliban and its component “Haqqani Network (HQN), al-Qa’ida core (AQ), al-Qa’ida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT), Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), ISIS-K, and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)”.

Terrorist sanctuaries on both sides of the border present security challenges for Afghanistan and Pakistan and pose a threat to regional security and stability.

The ISIS in Afghanistan is mainly located near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. It has grown from a modicum of mid-level Taliban commanders about five years ago, reported The Guardian Monday.

“If the Taliban stop fighting the US and the Afghan government, ISIS will aim to take over the role of the main opposition force in the country, gathering to its banners all the malcontents and rejectionists any deal would inevitably create. They would also seek to attract the support of the Taliban’s erstwhile supporters, inside and outside Afghanistan,” the report claimed.

Also read: Islamic State, al Qaeda hunker down to rebuild in weaker countries

The Afghan peace talks 

The ISIS is slowly building up the momentum in Afghanistan as the year-long US-led peace talks near a conclusion. Although it is clear that the talks will not be concluded by the 1-September deadline set by the Trump administration, it is nevertheless progressing fast.

In the aftermath of the Saturday bombings, the US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad said the Afghan Peace Process has to be “accelerated” including intra-Afghan negotiations.

“Success here will put Afghans in a much stronger position to defeat ISIS,” Khalilzad said in a tweet.

In an interview to The New York Times, Abdul Rahim Muslimdost, an Islamist cleric from Pakistan, who has been jailed in Pakistan and in the American detention camp at Guantánamo Bay, claimed to have played a role in establishing the ISIS network in Afghanistan.

According to Muslimdost, “If there is a settlement with the Taliban, and they become part of the government, Pakistan has the replacement for them ready already. They will continue this war in Afghanistan in the name of the Islamic State.”

Pakistan is the fourth end in the quadripartite talks.

The main objective of ISIS in Afghanistan now is to disrupt the peace talks to prevent Taliban from entering the corridors of power in Kabul. Besides, its ultimate aim continues to be claiming of territories in Afghanistan and establish the Islamic Caliphate.

However, some Taliban factions also owe allegiance to ISIS-K.

The United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan documented 2,640 war-related civilian deaths and 5,379 injuries in the first nine months of 2017, a slight decrease over the same period in 2016. The Taliban and groups claiming allegiance to ISIS-K were responsible for two-thirds of these, the Human Rights Watch said in a report.

ISIS in south Asia

Despite the US’ chest-thumping claims of defeating the ISIS about six months ago, the group raised its ugly head during the Easter Bombings in Sri Lanka in April that killed more than 250 people.

The Sri Lankan police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) claimed that the terrorists behind the 21 April attacks who hailed from the group National Thowheeth Jamath (NTJ) had no links to ISIS, but the probe revealed that the terrorists did follow ISIS’s ideology.

The NTJ itself claimed in a video that it pledged alliance to ISIS supremo Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. After a span of almost five years, Baghdadi appeared in a video days after the attack to claim that the bombings were carried out as a revenge for the fall of the Syrian town of Baghuz and that the group is fighting a “battle of attrition”.

Now, the Baghdadi-led group has firmly set its sights on Afghanistan.

Also read: With a resurgent Taliban and growing ISIS, no one is safe in Afghanistan


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. अच्छी प्रस्तुति। आज के आई एस आई एस की सतही कार्यवाहियों और कारगुजारियां की सुर्खियां मीडिया में आती है , बहुत से लेख और लेखक अपने अपने विचार रखते हैं! एक चीज पर न कोई ध्यान देता है न ,न बोलता न लिखता है।प्रशन सबसे पहले यह उठता है ,कि इस आतंकवादी संस्था का कोई बैंक नहीं, कोई हथियारों की फैक्ट्री नहीं,तो फिर इनके पास सौफिटिकेटिड हथियार कहा से आते हैं , हथियार ,मैन पावर ,अन्य लाइफ लाइन के लिये पैसा कहां से मिलता है? कोन देश है जो इनका पालन-पोषण करते हैं? अगर इस बिमारी की जड़ को खत्म करना है तो उन देशों और इतर धार्मिक संगठनों को दुनिया के सामने नंगा करना है और उन पर अंतरराष्ट्रीय कारवाई होनी चाहिए। आज आतंकवाद दुनिया की सबसे बड़ी समस्या है।

    सारा गोल माल ,मज़हब और सियासत के ठेकेदारों का गन्दा खेल है ,जो अपने स्वार्थ के लिए ,उपर से इन्सानियत और अन्दर से हैवानियत का खेल खेलते हैं।

    प्रेटरो डालर ,,,की ताकत ने मिडिल ईस्ट का मिजाज बदला , सलाफी और बहावी इस्लाम की आपसी टकराव ने ,अल कायदा , जैसे अपराधियों के समूह को ,, वैश्विक आतंकवाद की आग को जलाने के लिए खुल कर सपोर्ट किया,। दुनिया के इस्लामिक तेल उत्पादक संघ की भूमिका को नजरंदाज नहीं किया जा सकता ,पर्दे के पीछे के खेल चलते रहे हैं । अलकायदा , ओसामा बिन लादेन के बाद जमीन पर आ गिरा तो इस्लामिक स्टेट ,का बग़दादी, ग्रुप दुनिया के पर्दे पर आ गया । निजामे मुस्तफा,और गज़वा ए हिन्द की हरकतों को एशिया में पालने पोसने का का किया पाकिस्तान के ,, जिया-उल-हक ने
    उसकी पुश्त पनाही किसने की छुपा नहीं है। पाकिस्तान आज तमाम तरह के आतंकवाद की फैक्ट्री है , दुनिया के किसी भी देश में होने वाली आतंकवादी घटनाओं में परोक्ष रूप से पाकिस्तान सरकार के सम्बन्ध होने के पुख्ता सबूत है,पर वो कभी मानता नहीं।
    मिडिल ईस्ट में इराक, लिबिया के बाद सीरीया और एशिया में अफगानिस्तान की हालत अंतरराष्ट्रीय आतंकवादी अपराधियों के साथ साथ बड़े गुटों की आपसी चौधराहट भी इस समस्या को खत्म नहीं करना चाहते।
    वक्त ,का इंतजार किजीये ,और प्रार्थना किजीये ,,,,कि वो सुबह कभी तो आयेगी,,, जब दुनिया को आतंकवाद से निजात मिलेगी।

  2. So much of the infrastructure for terror exists in the Af – Pak region, two decades after the US invasion. So, to split the problem into two, a continued US presence of 14,000 troops is not going to solve it. This is something which requires America, China and Russia – none of which have any love for ISIS – to work together. Pakistan has a major role to play. Pity that India is no longer seen as part of the solution; we have a lot to lose. By focusing excessively on our bilateral differences with Pakistan, we may be missing out on contributing to bringing peace and stability to such a volatile part of our neighbourhood.

  3. This was a Shia wedding that was bombed?!

    Many Indians don’t realize Pakis receive hateful sectarian indoctrination besides hatred against non-Muslims. I have interacted and read paki comments in many forums and come across Sunni Pakis fiercely insisting Shias are not Muslims at all and are worse than kafirs. They have the worst hatred for Ahmedis.
    There isn’t as much sectarian animosity among Indian Muslims, though it seems some in UP. The couple of Indian Muslim friends I asked this, they don’t even want to talk about it.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular