If Captain Anshuman Singh’s parents are criticising their daughter-in-law in the media, they were likely doing worse in private. Smriti’s silence has allowed Indian uncles and aunties to skewer her.
India will need to recalibrate crude sourcing strategy as US ends waivers for Russian & Iranian oil, energy experts say. But Russian crude will likely remain central to energy basket.
This special edition of Cut The Clutter, straight from the Siliguri corridor, details the strategic importance of the narrow strip of land in West Bengal, and how it’s a vital link connecting the Northeast to the rest of India.
We now live in a world order that will keep shifting. India must use this window. This also means we remain disciplined enough not to be knee-jerked into reacting to what Pakistan sees as its moment in the sun.
I don’t agree with this outcry on misogyny completely.
It was very one sided.
You are just putting things in wrong light, putting guns to the other side by playing blame game.
The parents have also lost their son so their demand for the hold of mahavir chakra is justified. They have said that the fight is not for money. As the parents of a soldier who laid his life for the country or better rephrased as the parents who lost their son forever for this noblest cause they deserve a hold of mahavir chakra. The fight is for respect.
Moreover they also agreed for the lady to remarry to anyone she wants which is nowhere written. The parents also don’t want her to stay single or endure any pain in the loss of her husband which is also not written.
I don’t support their statement of remarrying younger brother but that is just one thing.
Their loss is irreparable. Smriti can get remarried but they can’t get their son back. This is something that makes people tilt sides towards parents.
This is a case that seems simple but is highly debatable.
I don’t support the actions or some of the dialogues of the parents. But they also said that the lady was a good wife prior to the incident which shows they didn’t seem to defame the lady just like that which is again hidden in the post. We should also remember that the father of the soldier was also from Army so we are here talking about an ex army person.
If they are denied any access to the mahavir chakra then that is not right.
That is the main point of contention.
Nobody is dictating the girl on how to live.
I don’t think many people would agree on all the terms and conditions put forward by the parents. The girl does have complete freedom to chose how to lead her life.
The main point of contention is the hold of mahavir chakra and that I feel is right. Since the parents also have right over it.
It seems an agenda driven post with only half truth shown.
Kudos!
It seems an agenda driven post with only half truth shown.
It was very one sided.
I don’t agree with this outcry on misogyny completely.
It was very one sided.
You are just putting things in wrong light, putting guns to the other side by playing blame game.
The parents have also lost their son so their demand for the hold of mahavir chakra is justified. They have said that the fight is not for money. As the parents of a soldier who laid his life for the country or better rephrased as the parents who lost their son forever for this noblest cause they deserve a hold of mahavir chakra. The fight is for respect.
Moreover they also agreed for the lady to remarry to anyone she wants which is nowhere written. The parents also don’t want her to stay single or endure any pain in the loss of her husband which is also not written.
I don’t support their statement of remarrying younger brother but that is just one thing.
Their loss is irreparable. Smriti can get remarried but they can’t get their son back. This is something that makes people tilt sides towards parents.
This is a case that seems simple but is highly debatable.
I don’t support the actions or some of the dialogues of the parents. But they also said that the lady was a good wife prior to the incident which shows they didn’t seem to defame the lady just like that which is again hidden in the post. We should also remember that the father of the soldier was also from Army so we are here talking about an ex army person.
If they are denied any access to the mahavir chakra then that is not right.
That is the main point of contention.
Nobody is dictating the girl on how to live.
I don’t think many people would agree on all the terms and conditions put forward by the parents. The girl does have complete freedom to chose how to lead her life.
The main point of contention is the hold of mahavir chakra and that I feel is right. Since the parents also have right over it.
It seems an agenda driven post with only half truth shown.
Kudos!