The Supreme Court Wednesday resumed hearing the pleas seeking a court-monitored investigation into the Rafale deal. The top court has deferred the ruling on...
In a tweet, Rahul Gandhi alleged that the 14-page document submitted to the SC shows that changes in the contract were made without asking the Air Force.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE GOVT.NARENDRA MODI IS THE GOVT.DEMOCRACY PERCOLATES DEON FROM LEGISLATIVE EXECUTIVE JUDICIARY AND MEDIA.INDIAN UNION REPUBLIC IS MADE BY GOVT NOT BY JUDICIARY.SC IS APPELLATE AUTHORITY NOT POLICY MAKERS.WHEN SC INTERVENES IN GOVERNANCE THE GOVT SHOULD CHALLENGES SC ON ITS WHIMS AND FANCIES.TODAY NARENDRA MODI IN HIS SPEEECH AT ALWAR WARNED SC NOT TO BE A TOOL IN THE HANDS OF CONGRESS.
Unfortunately it was Modi, Jaitley and Co in 2010 -2013 who wanted the SC to adjudicate on policy. 2G and coal allocations are glaring examples. Having opened the Pandora’s box, it’s too late now for the BJP to backtrack and wish that the SC does not look intp policy/
It is unbecoming of a court to interfere in Defense issues of Govt.The Petition is biased prejudiced intentional and motivated by few enemies of nation.Courts shouldn’t be a tool in their hands.
Difficult to judge – or speculate upon – what is in the Court’s mind. The technical specifications of the Rafale – contained in a 2007 RFP issued to six global manufacturers, hence widely known within the strategic community- are not being questioned. Unlikely that the apex court would take a harsh view on some departure from established procedures since all the statutory approvals have finally been secured. The case will ultimately turn on price, which is a matter of public interest. The price quoted by Dassault in its tender, which was found to be the lowest, will be the starting point. That will be compared to the final price agreed upon, the increase being analysed in terms of general inflation / currency depreciation and any additional systems that have been installed, beyond the original RFP specifications. 2. Offsets is another issue that has come up. Perhaps the Court will take a view on this.
SUPREME COURT IS NOT THE GOVT.NARENDRA MODI IS THE GOVT.DEMOCRACY PERCOLATES DEON FROM LEGISLATIVE EXECUTIVE JUDICIARY AND MEDIA.INDIAN UNION REPUBLIC IS MADE BY GOVT NOT BY JUDICIARY.SC IS APPELLATE AUTHORITY NOT POLICY MAKERS.WHEN SC INTERVENES IN GOVERNANCE THE GOVT SHOULD CHALLENGES SC ON ITS WHIMS AND FANCIES.TODAY NARENDRA MODI IN HIS SPEEECH AT ALWAR WARNED SC NOT TO BE A TOOL IN THE HANDS OF CONGRESS.
Unfortunately it was Modi, Jaitley and Co in 2010 -2013 who wanted the SC to adjudicate on policy. 2G and coal allocations are glaring examples. Having opened the Pandora’s box, it’s too late now for the BJP to backtrack and wish that the SC does not look intp policy/
It is unbecoming of a court to interfere in Defense issues of Govt.The Petition is biased prejudiced intentional and motivated by few enemies of nation.Courts shouldn’t be a tool in their hands.
Difficult to judge – or speculate upon – what is in the Court’s mind. The technical specifications of the Rafale – contained in a 2007 RFP issued to six global manufacturers, hence widely known within the strategic community- are not being questioned. Unlikely that the apex court would take a harsh view on some departure from established procedures since all the statutory approvals have finally been secured. The case will ultimately turn on price, which is a matter of public interest. The price quoted by Dassault in its tender, which was found to be the lowest, will be the starting point. That will be compared to the final price agreed upon, the increase being analysed in terms of general inflation / currency depreciation and any additional systems that have been installed, beyond the original RFP specifications. 2. Offsets is another issue that has come up. Perhaps the Court will take a view on this.