Neither Hindu right nor conservative Muslim clerics have a coherent case against Aamir Khan's marriage to Gauri Spratt. But that hasn't stopped either side from making one.
As religious identity transforms, the Indian-American diaspora finds new ways to balance ancient Vedic beliefs with the realities of 21st-century life.
Party manifesto vows to protect ‘civilisation, culture & rights’ of the people, to free encroached land from ‘Bangladeshi Miyas’—a pejorative term for Bengali-speaking Muslims.
Local newspapers in Bhopal initially ran wild stories about 'love jihad' and Muslim women running sex racket, but have stopped the follow-up coverage. Some are calling it a “perfect” plot line for Anurag Kashyap’s next film.
The assumption is simple: A Hindu woman’s proximity to a Muslim man is never neutral. It always requires scrutiny, explanation, and, if necessary, punishment.
Government tells Parliament toll collections touched Rs 70,278 crore in 2025-26, Rajasthan has highest number of toll plazas, while expenditure on operating plazas is not maintained centrally.
Our education system is a destroyer of all talent by enforcing learning by rote, pushing students to coaching classes to ‘crack’ competitive exams. And then, papers leak.
The blogger is playing a classic media trick here. By making this all about angry right-wingers on one side and loudmouth clerics on the other, she sets up a fake fight to distract everyone. It’s a total gimmick to protect a wealthy, powerful celebrity from real criticism.
Let’s look at the actual facts she completely skips over.
She asks what changed between 1986 and 2026. It’s not just “social media noise”…it’s the blatant double standard. If Aamir Khan, at 61 years old with all his money and influence, actually cared about the spirit of Islamic tradition, he would have married an Islamic divorcee or a struggling widow. That is the actual point of the verses in Surah An-Nisa and Al-Baqarah…..using marriage as social welfare to support vulnerable women. If he had done that, everyone would be applauding him right now. Instead, he just repeatedly cycles through affluent, high-profile partners under civil law.
What’s wild is that, as a woman columnist, the blogger doesn’t say a single word about this. Instead of asking why a massive cultural icon can’t show that kind of noble character, she writes a giant defense piece for him. She acts like anyone asking these questions is just a bitter neighborhood gossip.
People aren’t just caught up in a culture war; they are sick of rich elites using secular laws to completely ignore communal and ethical responsibilities, while writers like Amana cover for them.
You are a Modi Fan and won’t dare to call him out. This is all a result of bigotry spread by BJP and its ecosystem.
The blogger is playing a classic media trick here. By making this all about angry right-wingers on one side and loudmouth clerics on the other, she sets up a fake fight to distract everyone. It’s a total gimmick to protect a wealthy, powerful celebrity from real criticism.
Let’s look at the actual facts she completely skips over.
She asks what changed between 1986 and 2026. It’s not just “social media noise”…it’s the blatant double standard. If Aamir Khan, at 61 years old with all his money and influence, actually cared about the spirit of Islamic tradition, he would have married an Islamic divorcee or a struggling widow. That is the actual point of the verses in Surah An-Nisa and Al-Baqarah…..using marriage as social welfare to support vulnerable women. If he had done that, everyone would be applauding him right now. Instead, he just repeatedly cycles through affluent, high-profile partners under civil law.
What’s wild is that, as a woman columnist, the blogger doesn’t say a single word about this. Instead of asking why a massive cultural icon can’t show that kind of noble character, she writes a giant defense piece for him. She acts like anyone asking these questions is just a bitter neighborhood gossip.
People aren’t just caught up in a culture war; they are sick of rich elites using secular laws to completely ignore communal and ethical responsibilities, while writers like Amana cover for them.