Heavy police & paramilitary presence in Ayodhya is ensuring no open celebrations take place, after Supreme Court ruled that Hindus would get the disputed land.
Possession of inner and outer courtyard will be handed over to the trustees. Muslim parties to be given a 5-acre plot in Ayodhya, says 5-judge Supreme Court bench.
The Supreme Court ruled that the disputed site belonged to Hindus and a 5-acre plot will be handed over to Sunni board in Ayodhya for construction of a mosque.
The BJP needs Hindu unity for electoral benefit, that too in a caste-ridden religious society. That makes it go for reform, reconciliation, and samarasata.
Companies are borrowing more from banks and public. Economists say high capacity utilisation & growing new orders could set stage for renewed investment push by India Inc.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
Still not clear what Article 142 stipulates. The article is same as what’s appeared in other media. None of you guys seem to know the subject-matter you are obliged to write on .
Give examples of two hypothetical cases. One verdict in which Article 142 was not invoked, and another in which it was. Then the lay reader will understand the difference. Your readership after all comprises lay people, right?
Hotch pitch compilation
Still not clear what Article 142 stipulates. The article is same as what’s appeared in other media. None of you guys seem to know the subject-matter you are obliged to write on .
Give examples of two hypothetical cases. One verdict in which Article 142 was not invoked, and another in which it was. Then the lay reader will understand the difference. Your readership after all comprises lay people, right?