For some, the new brand of AMU politics is about reform. For others, it is only a manifestation of what they see as increasingly vitiating national politics.
While Chandra Shekhar Azad is a streetfighter who has caught the fancy of Dalit youth, Anil Antony is the face of the BJP’s fresh social engineering attempt.
Air India’s new policy, effective from 2 May, introduces new weight limits for tickets in each of the different 'fare families' — Comfort, Comfort Plus, and Flex.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
This old and unrelated photograph published as accompaniment to the article is a mistake(if not deliberate with malice aforethought)) or blunder on the part of The Print that also captions this as an old photograph. However the damage has been done and the hate brigade must be feeling elated at this ‘gift’ that can be stoked into a fire whenever it suits them. Even AMU residents that pass through that gate everyday have been surprised as we are conditioned to believe photographs as being true.
I would ask The Print to remove it and express regret. If visuals have to accompany an article then a building or road could have been shown. Showing persons sitting on roads where there was nothing is wrong and mischievous at the least, if not , it’s at least stupid and displays naivete especially of the editorial staff whose job it is to decide what goes up and where
The picture that you have used is not of that.Restrict your journalism with the fact not what you want you can print.
And should be removed as early as possible either a legal action will be done to this news site
This old and unrelated photograph published as accompaniment to the article is a mistake(if not deliberate with malice aforethought)) or blunder on the part of The Print that also captions this as an old photograph. However the damage has been done and the hate brigade must be feeling elated at this ‘gift’ that can be stoked into a fire whenever it suits them. Even AMU residents that pass through that gate everyday have been surprised as we are conditioned to believe photographs as being true.
I would ask The Print to remove it and express regret. If visuals have to accompany an article then a building or road could have been shown. Showing persons sitting on roads where there was nothing is wrong and mischievous at the least, if not , it’s at least stupid and displays naivete especially of the editorial staff whose job it is to decide what goes up and where
The picture that you have used is not of that.Restrict your journalism with the fact not what you want you can print.
And should be removed as early as possible either a legal action will be done to this news site