Digvijaya Singh at Off the Cuff event in Delhi
A file image of Digvijaya Singh at Off the Cuff event in Delhi| ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh defended his party’s stance on the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, and said the Congress did not want the “Ram Temple to be a matter of contention between two groups”.

In an exclusive interview to ThePrint, the former chief minister of Madhya Pradesh said the Congress has always been clear in its support for the temple’s construction.

“Religion is a very personal thing. Why do you want to bring politics into it? It’s about personal faith, I am a practising Hindu who believes in Sanatan Dharma,” Singh said.

“We would not like Lord Ram to be involved in any controversy,” he added.

Recently, the Congress had been accused of mimicking the BJP by promoting itself as a proponent of the Ram mandir. This happened especially after party general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra endorsed the bhoomi pujan, saying she hoped the ceremony became “a marker of national unity”.

Several people on social media, including AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi called out the Congress for “embracing the extremist ideology of Hindutva”.

However, Singh dismissed all of these allegations and said everyone had accepted the Supreme Court’s judgment on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit. In the judgment on 9 November 2019, the top court paved the way for the temple’s construction and held that the disputed site belonged to Hindus.

“Once the Supreme Court held that a Ram Mandir should be constructed, we all accepted it, even the Muslims accepted it,” he said.

“This is a country run by the Indian Constitution, and it gives every Indian citizen the right to follow the religion of their belief,” Singh added.


Also read: Secularism gave up language of religion. Ayodhya bhoomi pujan is a result of that


‘Whoever has committed crime should be punished’

While he defended the party against allegations of indulging in “Hindutva politics”, Singh also clarified that the Congress did not support the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992.

“If you study the SC order, it held that the Babri Masjid demolition was a criminal act. They have also recommended a speedy trial to persecute those involved in the demolition,” Singh said.

He added that the Congress, in its support for the Ram Temple, has “certainly not” failed in its fight for secularism.

The Rajya Sabha MP also condemned the violence that took place in the aftermath of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement in the 1990s.

In the week succeeding the demolition of the Babri Masjid on 6 December, the 1992-93 riots in Mumbai broke out. The riots reportedly left almost 900 people dead and over 2,000 people injured.

“It was ugly, the way it was handled. But after the SC order, everyone has accepted it. So we would not like our Lord Ram to be involved in any controversy,” Singh said.

Referring to the demolition, Singh also said “whoever has committed any criminal act has to be punished”.

A 28-year-old criminal trial against BJP leaders L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharti in connection to the demolition of the mosque is still going on in a special court in Lucknow.


Also read: ‘Dhanyawad Balasaheb’ — Shiv Sena is now going all out to claim credit for Ram Mandir


‘Timing of bhoomi pujan inauspicious’

Despite his outright support to the Ram Temple, Singh has spent the past week opposing the bhoomi poojan ceremony. His objection stems from the fact that the timing of the ceremony is “inauspicious”.

“Senior-most shankaracharyas, including Swami Swaroopananda ji who is my guru, had raised a fundamental question about the timing of this event. No activity related to construction of temple or any religious activity can take place during the four months called chatur maas. Senior religious leaders are not supposed to leave their place during this period,” Singh said.

He had also hit out at the BJP for “violating Sanatan Dharma” in a series of tweets Monday, even hinting at the fact that BJP leaders were contracting the coronavirus as a consequence of this violence. Home Minister Amit Shah tested positive for Covid-19 Monday.

“This could have been done at an appropriate time after discussion with pandits, even with those in Varanasi, which is the home constituency of PM Modi, what was the hurry?” Singh asked.

However, he reiterated that he had no objection to the construction of the Ram Temple, adding he was, in fact, a supporter of the cause.

“I challenge my detractors to show me one statement of mine where I have said anything against the construction of the Ram Mandir. In fact, I have been a supporter of this construction,” he added.

Singh did raise objections over the invitee list of the bhoomi pujan ceremony. Several other senior Congress leaders had also criticised the BJP for not inviting the party leadership for the ceremony, making it primarily a BJP-RSS event.

“What is (RSS chief) Mohan Bhagwat doing on that dais? He has done nothing to be there,” Singh said.


Also read: Whose Ram Rajya does Ayodhya temple bring — Gandhi’s or Modi’s? Ambedkar can answer


Rajiv Gandhi’s legacy

Singh also talked about former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi’s legacy after he was accused of paving the way for the destruction of the Babri Masjid by opening the mosque gates in 1986 to allow Hindus to offer prayers.

Singh had earlier said Gandhi also wanted the temple to come up.

“Rajiv Gandhi tried his best to bring about a compromise outside the court. And he was successful to a great extent. Even Narasimha Rao tried his best to bring all shankaracharya jis, all senior religious leaders together,” Singh said.

“He (Rao) wanted the construction of the mandir to be taken up by religious leaders and not political leaders,” Singh added.

The demolition of the Babri Masjid took place when Rao was the prime minister. The Congress lost the following Lok Sabha elections in 1996 and the loss is partly credited to Rao’s inability to stop the demolition.

Many have thus questioned if the Congress support to the Ram Temple will help the party electorally.

But Singh said this isn’t about politics for him.

“I don’t mix religion and politics. Even as CM when I saw someone doing religious fundamentalism…I have taken action against them, irrespective of which religion they belong to,” Singh said.

Loyalty to Gandhi-Nehru family ‘non-negotiable’

Amid the spate of troubles the Congress is plagued with, a new tussle between the young leaders and the old guard emerged last week. Congress MP Rajeev Satav, who is known to be close to Rahul Gandhi, blamed the two successive United Progressive Alliance governments for the election defeats in 2014 and 2019.

However, Singh denied that any such quarrel existed within the party.

“No Congressman would ever go against the Nehru-Gandhi family. This family has done immense service to the country starting from Nehru till UPA I and II,” Singh said.

“Loyalty to the Nehru-Gandhi family is non-negotiable for every Congressperson,” Singh added.


Also read: Not young versus old, Congress battle is between two failed guards


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

5 Comments Share Your Views

5 COMMENTS

  1. When Hindus were not united, Diggy’s Congress government filed an affidavit in court that Ram did not exist, that he is a myth. But if Hindus are united, even this “Osamaji” Singh will talk highly of Lord Ram. Let Hindus wake up.

  2. Don’t be SUPRISED a anti CAA SUPPORTER is interviewing a dangerous person who suspected MUMBAI ATTACK WAS RSS CONSPIRACY.

    BOTH ARE DISCUSSING SHRI RAM MANDIR. Hmmm

  3. Yes of course, now this rascal has become a practising Hindu who believes in Sanatan Dharma!!
    Bl00dy crooked man.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here