scorecardresearch
Friday, March 29, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionLetter From PakistanPakistan still obsessing over Abhinandan. How about an update on Israeli pilot...

Pakistan still obsessing over Abhinandan. How about an update on Israeli pilot Army ‘caught’

In Pakistan, PML-N leader's remarks on minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi are a more serious threat to national security than minister Fawad Chaudhry claiming a terror attack.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

The year of the rat continues to be obsessed with the year that was, 2019. That was when the enemy pilot Abhinandan came, had chai and left. He left, but like any jilted ex, the conversations continue about why he left us. He didn’t say, “It’s me, not you”. But for Pakistanis, it still remains an unfinished agenda even in 2020, the year that is actually all about being Modi’s yaar and Pakistan’s ghaddar.

This is Pakistan in a nutshell.

On Wednesday, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Ayaz Sadiq shared on the floor of the National Assembly how the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government was panicking to release Abhinandan Varthaman because it feared an attack from the Indian military. The conversation referred to a parliamentary briefing held after the capture of the Indian pilot in February 2019, an exchange that Prime Minister Imran Khan was not a part of even as Army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa was present. Sadiq explained that Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi was jittery with a sweaty forehead when he told those present at the briefing, “Khuda ka wasta hai ab isko jane dein (for god’s sake let him go),” referring to Abhinandan. According to Sadiq, India was going to attack Pakistan at 9pm.


Also read: In Pakistan, ‘Modi ka jo yaar hai, woh ghaddar hai’ mood is on


Hum bhi hain josh mein

It was as if Qureshi would turn into a pumpkin if Abhinandan wasn’t released before 9pm. Tea was still fantastic, 9pm or 9am. There is still no news on the fictitious Israeli pilot that Pakistan caught. Probably he is still having tea somewhere here.

Shocking revelation? Not really. The mention of an Indian attack was already made by PM Imran Khan during his address to the Assembly on February 28. He had said that there were fears India might launch a missile attack on Pakistan, but the situation was later defused.

What came as a real shocker was Science and Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry’s response to Ayaz Sadiq. In josh-e-khitabat, the minister went on to claim Pulwama terror attack, which killed 40 Indian soldiers, as a huge victory of Pakistan under the leadership of Imran Khan. “Humne Hindustan ko ghus ke maara hai (we hit India in their home). Our success in Pulwama was the success of the nation,” Chaudhry said, berating the PML-N leader.

Chaudhry just fell short of breath, otherwise the flow in which he was, he might as well have taken credit for crashing planes into the World Trade Centre on 9/11. It was only after he had made all the confessions that he thought he should modify his boast a bit, which is what he did: “Pulwama ke baad humne ghus ke maara” — the modification being ‘after Pulwama’.


Also read: ‘Go Niazi go’ to ‘Go Nawaz go’ – Pakistan protests are like a rock concert with songs, DJs


Priorities you & I won’t understand

The minister’s ramblings were astounding and could have serious repercussions for Pakistan. But what woke the military spokesman up from deep slumber was Ayaz Sadiq and not Fawad Chaudhry. Even repeated allegations of political engineering against Qamar Bajwa by former prime minister Nawaz Sharif didn’t sprung DG-ISPR into action. But here he was. Now a pro at rejecting stuff from political leaders, Babar Iftikhar held a presser to reject the statement that Abhinandan was released owing to perceived threat of an Indian attack.

Only in Pakistan are the remarks on an opposition leader a more serious threat to national security than a sitting minister’s 60 seconds of claiming and celebrating a terrorist attack. This is the reason why PTI ministers are taken as seriously as they are around the world. And the same set of ministers now want a criminal charge against Ayaz Sadiq. Him revealing that Qureshi’s legs were shaking and he was sweating is tantamount to outing State secrets?

A campaign to brand Sadiq a ‘traitor’ is now on, with posters coming up on the streets of Lahore. Sadiq is shown wearing an Abhinandan-like moustache with both Modi and the Indian pilot in the background. ‘Mir Jaffar, Mir Sadiq…Ayaz Sadiq’ is the tagline.

The excuse for the extreme reaction is to point towards “how Indian media is having a field day with Ayaz Sadiq’s statement”. But the same people choose to look the other way when Indian media is amplifying Fawad Chaudhry’s remarks and bringing more attention. If coverage in Indian media is the parameter of bringing bad name to the country, then where does PM Imran Khan stand over his several interviews and conclaves that he attended in India, where he said the most controversial things? Where does he stand over the Indian media’s rather extensive coverage of PTI’s dharnas when he was in the opposition?


Also read: Pakistan Army can’t risk controversy with Nawaz Sharif, sacrificing Imran Khan easier


Imran Khan’s simple rule

The entire episode reflects the simmering tension between the PTI and the opposition parties ever since the anti-government protests began. It is clear that when confronted with the ghaddari (traitor) allegations, the leaders of PML-N and even other parties reply in the same coin. If the previous PML-N government will be blamed for Kulbhushan Jadhav’s case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), its leaders will hit back with PTI going out of the way and making concessions for Jadhav now.

The world may have moved onto dealing with more pressing concerns brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic, or bothering about who will be the next president of the United States. But what matters the most to the government of Imran Khan is the continuous labelling of his political opponents as pawns of India. In Khan dreamland, whether he’s in opposition or in power, his opponents remain traitors. He vehemently believed that whenever Nawaz Sharif was in trouble, tension along Pakistan’s borders and terror attacks increased. Now as prime minister, he still gives out certificates of working with ‘Israeli and Indian lobby’ to the opposition. For Imran Khan, it works like: heads I win, tails you lose.

The author is a freelance journalist from Pakistan. Her Twitter handle is @nailainayat. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

9 COMMENTS

  1. Don’t give ideas to Fawad Ch he just might take responsibility of 9/11. naila is the only Pakistani writer at print whose columns are not mundane dry

  2. All I can is the article writer is Narrow minded and moron and uselessly propagating a sentance. Lot of mistakes happen during speak. Dawa was talking about the dog fight in which Pakistan entered into Indian territory and deliberately bombed near their camps.

    When you nothing to write in your dull brain you make issue of on issue.

  3. Shame Israeli pilot have to drink too much fantastic tea every day . Because he is not Indian no body can ask for his release . He became an orphan, its Shame for Indian air force which took help from Israel used Israeli bunker buster bombs and used Israeli pilots because Indian air force herself didn’t had courage to conduct operation on Pakistan’s soil. Indian sukhoi was crashed inside Indian territory but pilot landed in Pakistan after ejection like abhinandan.
    Israeli pilot will remain in Pakistan’s custody because his help for India.

  4. If this writer publishes this article in Pakistan, won’t she be in serious trouble? No doubt, Pakistan’s contradictions delight us. Admission of terrorist attack on the floor of Parliament by a serving minister is less serious threat than another MP claiming how scared the foreign minister and the Generals were. India should use this admission in the Pakistan Parliament in the next meeting of FATF. Perhaps raise this issue in the General Assembly also to have Pakistan labelled by the UN as a terrorism sponsor.

  5. ISPR confirmed second pilot died in custody. there’s videos of him in the hospital and all. And dont make stuff up. All international media agrees that India didn’t shoot down and F16, and that Indian jets missed their targets in Balakot. American, Australian, EU sattelites, all confirmed Indian jets didnt hit any significant targets, if you do any research via neutral foreign observers. Even some pro Indian lawmakers in US said “India didn’t shoot down an F16, even though we wish they did”. US count confirmed by two US officials proved Pakistan didn’t lose any F16. No wreckage has ever been found, and not even the locals saw any F16 shot down.

  6. everyone knows he was talking about the post-pulwama, pakistani planes striking India inside Kashmir and not talking about the terror strike that killed 40 soldiers.

    but everyone interprets things in their own way, for their own benefit. Creating NEWS from literally everything actually feeds modern Media and that’s how Media business works. Particularly, when it is the enemy media.

  7. Well done Ms Naila Inayat! Well analysed with facts rather than rhetoric! Pakistan seems to be on a Tailspin with basic principle of ‘Modi Ka Yaar, Pakistaan ka Gaddar!’
    Acceptance of Pulwama is at least some honesty

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular