Latest news on UGC |
UGC building in New Delhi | Photo: Manisha Mondal | ThePrint
Text Size:

There are two very striking reasons that compel me to discuss several features and recommendations of the recently announced National Education Policy, or NEP 2020, by the Narendra Modi government. While one of them is a personal success story, the other is an academic puzzle in the form of agencies like UGC that have for long been the bane of Indian universities. Let’s start with the latter one.

As I understand, nearly all the features of the NEP 2020 in the context of higher education could have easily been introduced by any central university without a push from the government. These universities have had all the powers and regulatory bandwidth to implement the policy recommendations as suggested under the NEP ‘umbrella’.

In such a scenario, it’s worth examining why this did not happen and what it portends for India’s education system.

Also read: India’s education system looks to Ivy League but regulatory bodies like UGC get in the way

The failure of UGC

There are two compelling factors why Indian universities couldn’t do what a national policy is now trying to achieve. The first is the dark shadow cast by agencies such as the University Grants Commission (UGC), which deter any experimentation.

Over the years, the UGC has acquired all kinds of strange and counterproductive powers that often run against the grain of the Acts and Statutes of a university. These actions hamper free thinking in universities, and there is micromanagement to the extreme. We need not look any further than the issue of how universities will handle examinations during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. If our universities do not have the requisite wisdom and wherewithal to deal with such straightforward situations, how will they impart any useful knowledge to their students? The matter has gone to the ridiculous length of being taken up by the Supreme Court of India.

Contrast this with the ways adopted by the highly regarded universities of the West, which have often been cited in the debates engendered by the NEP. All prominent universities have taken decisions within the confines of their own realm and environment. So why have Indian universities not been able to do so?

Of course, the NEP 2020 has warranted the creation of an overarching and solitary agency — the National Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC) — which carries the spirit with which the UGC was initially created. But it also carries much more in terms of its ambit as the new regulatory body. If it stays the way it has been envisioned, a lot of good will flow through the actions of the agency. If it falters the way the UGC has over the past decades, the NHERC can cause enormous damage. Thus, it is incumbent on the government of the day to ensure that institutions do not degenerate over time. However, in the current context, it shall be unfair to lay the sole blame for the sorry state of affairs on the doorstep of the UGC.

Also read: 2019 was the year when India’s education system took a backseat under Modi regime

The failure of universities

A great deal of responsibility also lies with India’s universities and with those who head them. I have repeatedly underscored the need to put in place processes and measures that ensure the selection of only high-quality leadership for our universities. If we do not do this, then no amount of policy making will get us anywhere.

In any case, with policies, there are other dangers as well. Sometimes, a policy can create many pitfalls such as a ‘one size fits all’ prescription. They can also bind us to a path that may need to be changed or corrected in the light of new learning.

None of the much vaunted institutions of learning — such as Harvard University, Stanford University and the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine — have gotten where they have riding on the back of a centrally crafted policy. In fact, Harvard University began to acquire its hallowed aura only when the local government — in 1870 — relinquished control of the now famed university.

Also read: One look at Allahabad University will tell you how inbreeding is ruining India’s academics

A personal achievement

The thing about good policies is that formulating them is like winning half the battle — the only thing left for the complete victory is to implement them. This brings me to the first — personal — reason why I am also delighted at, and therefore welcome, the Modi government’s NEP 2020.

As it so happens, most of the features that pertain to higher education in the NEP are a near verbatim reproduction of the essential features of the four-year undergraduate programme (FYUP) envisioned and implemented at the University of Delhi when I was its Vice Chancellor. I am thus quite enthused by the recommendations of the NEP.

I say this with much conviction because if implemented in the right manner, they should help bring about significant all-round improvement. The results and feedback from the time we ran the FYUP have strengthened our belief on its value and strength. Unfortunately, after an excellent run for a year, the FYUP was rolled back under a UGC directive that carried no justification.

However, and propitiously, what has gone largely unnoticed is the fact that we ran in parallel, and without interruption, an even more strengthened version of the FYUP at the Cluster Innovation Centre (CIC). That programme runs to this day. The CIC was created during my time as the Vice Chancellor under very airtight conditions, and it remained impervious to the assaults of the UGC.

Also read: Something’s wrong with how university VCs are picked. Exam delay debate is one fallout

CIC, a success story

The first bunch of graduating students have now spread their wings far and wide. They are not just employed at top corporate institutions such as Google but have also succeeded as entrepreneurs. There is much evidence from recent times. A United States and Delhi-based startup, Delightree, founded by two of our CIC graduates who sowed its seeds while still studying with us and who completed the four-year UG programme at the CIC, has raised $3 million from Accel and some other venture firms in the US.

Another very thriving startup is TNine Infotech — named after the classroom where it was conceived at the CIC. Equally heartening is the highly innovative startup, Precisely, which is being run successfully by the current students of the CIC in cooperation with some of its former students. The quality and amount of research papers produced by the undergraduate students has been very impressive. For instance, a number of currently enrolled students at the CIC have produced a mathematical model of the manner in which they expected the coronavirus to spread in India. Their model has so far predicted with more than 95 per cent accuracy the spread of the coronavirus in the country.

Also read: How China makes it possible for a German to study ancient Indian math in its university

Word of advice

If implemented properly, we should expect nothing but good outcomes from the recommendations in NEP 2020 that pertain to higher education. However, a word of caution is in order. Not ensuring the spirit of the NEP vision can also cause a lot of harm. One of the most important of these dangers relates to the training and orientation of the teaching faculty.

The teaching staff in Indian universities have largely been schooled in the traditional manner and do not grasp the meaning and importance of trans-disciplinary education, project-based learning, and how knowledge can be linked to entrepreneurial activity. The NEP recommends establishing a National Professional Standards for Teachers by 2022 and their education, as reported by Hindustan Times, “will be gradually moved into multidisciplinary colleges and universities by 2030”.

Clearly, the NEP has all the ingredients of transforming India’s education system but implementation is the key. And therein lies the danger.

The author is the former vice-chancellor of the University of Delhi, a distinguished mathematician and an educationist. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

4 Comments Share Your Views


  1. The thing common to all govt in India is that they are very good at making policy but horrendous at implementation. Babus poke their noses in everything and a good idea goes to rot. In the process, the cure becomes worse than the disease itself. The present Modi sarkar also has a similar record of bad implementation of promising policy and ideas. Plus their RSS agenda makes their vision extremely short-sighted and tunnel-like. We can only hope that with this NEP the treatment does not become worse than the disease it is trying to cure. The price for DeMo was paid by India’s poor and small businesses – the price for this one will be paid by our children. That will be an all-round tragedy.

    My suggestion is for the govt to try and improve on existing education system by removing middle-men, reducing red-tape and simplifying rules – something similar to the way they improved the subsidy system of the UPA. Let the parents, guided by market forces, decide what they want their children to learn. Making policy is not this govt strong suit.

  2. The UGC is an entity that serves no discernible purpose , other than being an unnecessary bureaucratic impediment for the Universities……When the government intends to channelize grants to universities, it can happen on a one-to-one basis between the concerned ministry/dept and the university’s department…….and if the government is required to have administrative supervision (reservations in admissions and hiring, promotions, staffing concerns and all such), this can happen by placing nodal officers in every government funded university, reporting to the governor (who is afterall the chancellor of the university, right?) of the respective state………..the syllabus, methods and modes of instruction, methods and modes of assessment, the fees , and the programs offered, etc etc, should be totally under the control of the said University subject to approval of the VC and the Chancellor.

    So, what useful function does the UGC serve..other than stifling the academic environment with silly bureaucratic dogma….but, that’s hardly useful, no?

    • So to get rid of babus in UGC you want bigger babus (IAS) in the university senate !!
      Best is to give universities Block Grants depending on their performance.

    • It exists like all government departments to create employment. In India we can probably shut down 75% if government departments and it will make no difference. In all probability things will only improve.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here