Niti Aayog’s health and nutrition adviser Alok Kumar
Niti Aayog’s health and nutrition adviser Alok Kumar | By special arrangement
Text Size:

New Delhi: The impact of Covid-19 in India has been relatively less severe, by whichever matrix one looks at it, said a health expert from the Narendra Modi government’s think-tank Niti Aayog.   

“If we look at cases per million, we are at just 151 cases per million as compared to over 5,000 cases per million for the US and Spain,” Alok Kumar, Adviser (Health and Nutrition), Niti Aayog told ThePrint in an exclusive interview.  

“Our case fatality rate (CFR) is around 2.8 per cent and has remained consistently low,” said Kumar, a 1993-batch IAS officer of the Uttar Pradesh cadre.  

As a way of comparison, Kumar cited the CFR in other countries.  “Germany is 5 per cent, it is 19 per cent in France, 6 per cent in the US and over 14 per cent in both Italy and the UK,” he added.  

CFR is the proportion of people who die from a disease among all individuals diagnosed with the disease. 

“If we look at death per million population, India has recorded four deaths per million whereas the numbers for the UK is 585, the US is 330, Germany is 104 and Brazil is 153,” he said, adding that “even allowing for our younger demography, our health system has been able to cope up with the pandemic reasonably well so far”.  

According to Kumar’s analysis, the cities most affected by Covid-19 contribute to over 65 per cent of the national caseload. “While it is true that some states share a higher caseload burden than others, there is a clear emerging pattern that dense urban populations are more susceptible to viral infection spread than others.”   

R0, CFR, death rate — which is the most accurate measure of checking the extent of the outbreak?  

“While all parameters are relevant in their own way catering to different monitorable criteria, death per million population is the most important number to keep in mind, because in this both the numerator and denominator are relatively less prone to measurement errors,” he said. 

While CFR reflects upon the success of our clinical efforts, lower R0 (R naught) reflects the success of our infection containment and mitigation strategy, he added. 

R0 is the measure of the average number of people who will contract a contagious disease from one person with that disease. 

Also read: AYUSH ministry warns drug-makers to not sell products using false claims, threatens FIRs

Lessons for India

Kumar emphasised that India needs to be more strategic for planning health infrastructure.

“The National Health Policy (NHP), 2017, clearly articulates the need for enhanced government financing of health but it also requires us to look at the other elements of the health ecosystem,” he said. 

These issues include medical education and its quality, greater self-reliance in terms of medicines, medical devices and diagnostics and also streamlining regulatory pathways.

The NHP is a document published by the central government annually stating the country’s health objectives and goals for a well-defined period. 

“NITI Aayog has been advocating a whole-systems approach to health in India as brought out in its volume ‘Health System for a New India- Building Blocks: Potential Pathways to Reform’, which presents a series of options for consideration,” Kumar said.

The report released last year integrates viewpoints on the concerted efforts required for strengthening the existing fractured health system, to meet the challenges that lie ahead of the nation. 

Also read: Sun Pharma gets approval to test plant-based dengue drug for Covid treatment

Niti Aayog’s projections

The central government depends on the projections from NITI Aayog to plan its infrastructure. For instance, it began a 100-day programme to forecast emergency requirements that may arise in the next three months, depending on how much the coronavirus outbreak intensifies.

“Niti Aayog consulted a wide range of experts who included epidemiologists, statisticians, economists, inputs from other Ministries in Government of India and also feedback from the ground before arriving at our estimates for the projections of how Covid-19 will pan out in India,” Kumar said. “As you would appreciate, projections involving exponential function with great uncertainties in assumptions is a risky exercise in the best of times.”

“But I am happy to say that the projections proved to be robust in terms of the planning exercise to handle the Covid-19 response,” he added. “It is also important to note that all India aggregates hide regional disparities that are bound to occur in a country as vast and diverse as India.”

Best performers, globally 

The Niti Aayog expert also listed the other countries he believes have handled the pandemic well.   

“Lots of countries have applied innovative approaches to handling Covid-19 pandemic, but to my mind the following countries stand out in terms of their overall systemic response,” the IAS officer said. “While Taiwan used the lessons from previous outbreaks, extensive use of technology and compliance by the public, New Zealand focussed on elimination over containment, timely measures and science-driven communication with the public. 

“Fast and free testing, expansive tracing technology, and mandatory isolation of the most severe cases helped South Korea whereas Germany tackled outbreak well due to people’s participation, high numbers of testing and detection and suitable response in managing beds, doctors and nurses, material and medical equipment,” he added. 

Also read: US’ Gilead Sciences enters India to boost supply of potential Covid drug remdesivir


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

2 Comments Share Your Views


  1. Well he is just telling the numbers from the deaths which are medically certified
    In India only 20% deaths are medically certified. If a person dies before even tested then they wont do the postmortem or try to find out what disease casused his/her death. So that death wont be counted due to which in india the death rate data is low compare to other countries where 100% deaths are medically certified
    India’s health care system is nothing compare to those developed countries whom that idiot is comparing.
    So currently 7400 deaths been reported due to corona virus but the actual number can be 37000 in india

  2. Quite a mouthpiece of the Modi Govt.
    India is at # 5 , soon to be #4 in the world ranking for Covid Total Cases.
    Just amazes me how this “think tank” can come up with this shit! Shameful/Shameless.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here