Sulmaan Wasif Khan’s ‘Haunted by Chaos’ tells the story of how China’s leaders shaped its destiny through their distinct ideologies, traumatic pasts and disparate visions.
It took 13 rounds of diplomatic discussions over 6 weeks to defuse the tension that had sparked fears of war, top officials told a parliamentary panel.
The US-China trade war is likely to have an adverse impact on global trade and economic growth. It could once again lead to a rise in global imbalances and inequality. However, India fears that that the Trump-Xi clash could also result in China using it as a dumping ground for its goods.
While the language war in other states is targeting those who can't speak the local language, in Bengal, even those whose mother tongue is Bengali have to constantly prove their Bengali-ness.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
Capable of being fired in plain and high-altitude areas, it has day-and-night capability and two-way data link to support post-launch target, aim-point update.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
Even in Central Asia Uighurs, Uzbeks,Tajik we were all adherent to Islam,never ever eat pork, this Kazakh and kirgis did-they are not so religious! So how these three Hidu, who is siting in India make such a statement.
you simply do not know us as a people, you do not know our values and culture.I remember as a child we were not allowed even to eat at Russians classmates(parents were scared at we will get pork)
in our culture we do not drink, some does but just like in Turkey or other muslim country!
to write such an artical to be sure you have whole context
How these 2 journalists and Srikant Kondapalli can discredit Uighurs in Islam?
even if we were under CCP as you wrote:
“Certainly, the Uyghur have a problem. Because they have been part of Communist China for nearly 70 years, they have been forced to participate in the Communist Party’s atheist diktat. This means that all overt allegiance to any religion is banned”
We uighurs alaways stayed adherant to islam!Uighurs are strong in tradition and values!! We always keep and kept respect and love to our culutre and religion!How you can write such a bull shit if you three never ever see or been in Xinjinag!
And who this is incompetent “professor- Srikant Kondapalli ?
“professor of international affairs at Jawaharlal Nehru University and expert on China, pointed out that the Muslim world’s silence on China’s not-small Muslim population was also because “the narrative surrounding the Uyghur itself follows a double-trap approach”.”
what narratives Uighur have?A?How you can write such a lie ?
I have only one thing in my mind-chinese paid you!
“For the West, they are projected by the Chinese as terrorists trying to split the country, while the Muslim world sees them as pork-eating, alcohol-drinking liberal Muslims who do not integrate well with the behavioural norms of their own conservative nations,” Kondapalli added.
China as a nation lacks transparency n prefers to work in darkness & behind the scenes. Their strength is their economic power. They have a plan b plan c etc. They have colonized Africa with their economic strength and will make all such weak nations indebted for long long time. China has minimal respect for world order and respect for rule of law in international business. China is probably the biggest threat for the world order, if they go unchecked for next decades
Although OIC members do not openly criticise China’s treatment of its Uyghur minority, because of economic and geopolitical considerations, they would share the pain of their coreligionists. Today’s China cannot behave like Stalin’s Soviet Union, locking up a million people, right where BRI brings the world into its territory. It comes across as a brittle, insecure nation, for all its wealth and power, in its treatment of its minorities. It should be possible to strike a better, more humane balance between the cultural religious, linguistic aspirations of its minorities and the protection of its territorial integrity. It is unable to abide by its solemn promise of One country, two systems in Hong Kong, which no one is planning to snatch away from it. By stubbornly refusing to open up internally, as many had hoped it would, as it became a more prosperous country, China is failing to become a global role model, which others would wish to follow. In that sense, it will never draw level with the United States in terms of global power, reach, influence.
read western press all muslims turned blind because of money loan of several billions fro china!!!
THAT IS WHY!
AND NOT BECAUSE AS YOU WROTE!!!
that is why i always preffered west journalism and its media
Even in Central Asia Uighurs, Uzbeks,Tajik we were all adherent to Islam,never ever eat pork, this Kazakh and kirgis did-they are not so religious! So how these three Hidu, who is siting in India make such a statement.
you simply do not know us as a people, you do not know our values and culture.I remember as a child we were not allowed even to eat at Russians classmates(parents were scared at we will get pork)
in our culture we do not drink, some does but just like in Turkey or other muslim country!
to write such an artical to be sure you have whole context
How these 2 journalists and Srikant Kondapalli can discredit Uighurs in Islam?
even if we were under CCP as you wrote:
“Certainly, the Uyghur have a problem. Because they have been part of Communist China for nearly 70 years, they have been forced to participate in the Communist Party’s atheist diktat. This means that all overt allegiance to any religion is banned”
We uighurs alaways stayed adherant to islam!Uighurs are strong in tradition and values!! We always keep and kept respect and love to our culutre and religion!How you can write such a bull shit if you three never ever see or been in Xinjinag!
And who this is incompetent “professor- Srikant Kondapalli ?
“professor of international affairs at Jawaharlal Nehru University and expert on China, pointed out that the Muslim world’s silence on China’s not-small Muslim population was also because “the narrative surrounding the Uyghur itself follows a double-trap approach”.”
what narratives Uighur have?A?How you can write such a lie ?
I have only one thing in my mind-chinese paid you!
“For the West, they are projected by the Chinese as terrorists trying to split the country, while the Muslim world sees them as pork-eating, alcohol-drinking liberal Muslims who do not integrate well with the behavioural norms of their own conservative nations,” Kondapalli added.
China as a nation lacks transparency n prefers to work in darkness & behind the scenes. Their strength is their economic power. They have a plan b plan c etc. They have colonized Africa with their economic strength and will make all such weak nations indebted for long long time. China has minimal respect for world order and respect for rule of law in international business. China is probably the biggest threat for the world order, if they go unchecked for next decades
Although OIC members do not openly criticise China’s treatment of its Uyghur minority, because of economic and geopolitical considerations, they would share the pain of their coreligionists. Today’s China cannot behave like Stalin’s Soviet Union, locking up a million people, right where BRI brings the world into its territory. It comes across as a brittle, insecure nation, for all its wealth and power, in its treatment of its minorities. It should be possible to strike a better, more humane balance between the cultural religious, linguistic aspirations of its minorities and the protection of its territorial integrity. It is unable to abide by its solemn promise of One country, two systems in Hong Kong, which no one is planning to snatch away from it. By stubbornly refusing to open up internally, as many had hoped it would, as it became a more prosperous country, China is failing to become a global role model, which others would wish to follow. In that sense, it will never draw level with the United States in terms of global power, reach, influence.