The Pallava dynasty was turning toward Shaivism. Buddhists took immediate note and strung up a narrative where Shiva is immature and Trailokyavijaya emerges supreme.
In Tibet and China, he would take on altogether darker tantric forms, whereas in Japan, he evolved into a unique ‘twin’ form with a male and female aspect.
In Tripura, the Sanskritic culture served as a veneer over a vibrant, cosmopolitan Northeastern world that we are often too quick to dismiss today as 'tribal' or 'violent'.
Using hydraulics and clockwork, engineers could make wondrous devices that are now lost. These were more credible than claims about pre-modern Indian technology such as UFOs and genetic engineering.
While releasing 'India Employment Report 2024', V Anantha Nageswaran said govt can't solve 'all social, economic challenges'. Congress leader Kharge says CEA protecting 'dear leader'.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
I am little lost with the Culinary preferences here. Also, sure Ahoms are foreign to India as the Turks. But I believe the process of assimilation was far more flexible amongst the Ahoms then amongst the Turks. The Ahoms literally lost their language, script, religion everything. Can we really compare the two? Are we missing out some nuances? But please understand here that I am not talking about the foreignness. The question is about the comparison. The bloodshed you have mentioned have been there amongst others too. But it’s more vividly recorded in Buranjis.
Not saying the article is wrong. It’s good and insightful. These are genuine queries I developed while going through the article.
I am little lost with the Culinary preferences here. Also, sure Ahoms are foreign to India as the Turks. But I believe the process of assimilation was far more flexible amongst the Ahoms then amongst the Turks. The Ahoms literally lost their language, script, religion everything. Can we really compare the two? Are we missing out some nuances? But please understand here that I am not talking about the foreignness. The question is about the comparison. The bloodshed you have mentioned have been there amongst others too. But it’s more vividly recorded in Buranjis.
Not saying the article is wrong. It’s good and insightful. These are genuine queries I developed while going through the article.