History often arrives draped in marble, poetry, and romance, while concealing its scars beneath silk. Monuments may dazzle the eyes, but chronicles often unsettle the conscience.
The film’s poster showed Rawal with a Taj Mahal miniature, lifting the dome to reveal a Shiva idol inside. It faced immense backlash, causing the actor to remove it from social media.
UP, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan are the top five favourite destinations for domestic visitors. While for foreign tourists, Maharashtra, West Bengal, UP, Gujarat, and Rajasthan top the chart.
An analysis by online marketplace Judaica Web Store shows that Paris's Notre-Dame saw the most number of Instagram hashtags, while Golden Temple is most visited annually.
Farmer Munna Lal says his father & uncle were registered cultivators of the land, but it was taken away in urban ceiling action in 1976. However, court ruled in family's favour in 1998.
Army sources said the uniform comes with respect and every jawan and officer should honour it and not allow social media trends to influence their actions.
An oil shock, monsoon fears, rampant unemployment, and the seeming inevitability of inflation are common to both eras. Indira Gandhi’s self-destructive responses are instructive today.
What many of the Timurid apologists(who I suspect have also a case of Stockholm syndrome going for them) do not realise is that there was a major difference among these many instances of pre-modern violence(which was common to all for sure), some were definitely more violent than others and with a clear religious motivation underlying their violence. This is what Abhaas ji is stating in this fact based article about these invaders.
The Marathas invasion of Bengal? Sure, discuss it…Gangaram. Why not? Unlike you who wants to white wash Mughals rule, the author would not shy away.
Another wants to discuss the political impact of Lanka and Kurukshetra wars. Sure, bring it on.
History of India has been revised and rewritten by the invasing Muslim and British many times. What is indeed happening now is restoration. So, yes, by all means, this should be researched and restored but neither forgottten nor abandoned…just be ause it inconveniences an ashok, a gangaram or an alex…alll of whom may not be who their ids indicate them to be.
One more “historian” whistling to his dogs. Has this “historian” read (or even heard of) the Maharashtra Purana? Is he aware of the Bargis? The Maratha Invasion of Bengal between 1741 and 1751? Merceneries under Raghoji Bhonsle who looted, pillaged, plundered Bengal, killing a lot of Hindus, even?
Here was a Muslim Navab, Alivardi Khan, protecting his Hindu populace against Maratha mercenaries! History is very interesting, indeed, if you care to read it properly. Or maybe this “historian” didn’t want to bring it up because it didn’t suit his narrative.
And then there are nitwits who have never read a page of history, who come here to support and defend all the filth that’s spewed in these articles. Jobless people, indeed!
Are we also going to examine the less shinier aspects of all rulers pre Mughals for a balanced perspective?
Or delve into a study of the economic, social and political impact of the two greatest wars ever fought – the ones at Lanka and Kurukshetra?
History, especially in school texts, is a heavily edited version of events. Yes it should be updated to highlight both positives and negatives of the rulers – but that application shouldn’t be selective.
And I suspect, once the religious markers are masked, there won’t be much difference between rulers across race, religion and gender.
Great piece. Never forget this history…the real history. Dudette ashok says not to stir up but he doesn’t realize the problem of miseducation that he qas our through. We need more such balanced and nuanced perspective,.exploration amd exposition, of facts that 6gis civilization has had to endure.
Mr.ashok, Satyameva Jayate nanritam. Truth Always Triumphs whether you like it or not, whether you want to rake it up or not, whether you want to be aware or not
Do not stir the settled sediment of history. Some things should be left to Ms Romila Thapar. Or Professor Ramchandra Guha. India has crushing problems, none of which will get resolved by setting different communities on edge. There are so many well documented atrocities from what may be called “ the other side “, after Mughal rule concluded.
The author seems to be living in an alternate reality — jihad, extraction, and imperial plunder are practically all India has heard of the Mughals in recent years.
What many of the Timurid apologists(who I suspect have also a case of Stockholm syndrome going for them) do not realise is that there was a major difference among these many instances of pre-modern violence(which was common to all for sure), some were definitely more violent than others and with a clear religious motivation underlying their violence. This is what Abhaas ji is stating in this fact based article about these invaders.
The Marathas invasion of Bengal? Sure, discuss it…Gangaram. Why not? Unlike you who wants to white wash Mughals rule, the author would not shy away.
Another wants to discuss the political impact of Lanka and Kurukshetra wars. Sure, bring it on.
History of India has been revised and rewritten by the invasing Muslim and British many times. What is indeed happening now is restoration. So, yes, by all means, this should be researched and restored but neither forgottten nor abandoned…just be ause it inconveniences an ashok, a gangaram or an alex…alll of whom may not be who their ids indicate them to be.
One more “historian” whistling to his dogs. Has this “historian” read (or even heard of) the Maharashtra Purana? Is he aware of the Bargis? The Maratha Invasion of Bengal between 1741 and 1751? Merceneries under Raghoji Bhonsle who looted, pillaged, plundered Bengal, killing a lot of Hindus, even?
Here was a Muslim Navab, Alivardi Khan, protecting his Hindu populace against Maratha mercenaries! History is very interesting, indeed, if you care to read it properly. Or maybe this “historian” didn’t want to bring it up because it didn’t suit his narrative.
And then there are nitwits who have never read a page of history, who come here to support and defend all the filth that’s spewed in these articles. Jobless people, indeed!
Assuming that everything cited here is true.
Now what ?
Are we also going to examine the less shinier aspects of all rulers pre Mughals for a balanced perspective?
Or delve into a study of the economic, social and political impact of the two greatest wars ever fought – the ones at Lanka and Kurukshetra?
History, especially in school texts, is a heavily edited version of events. Yes it should be updated to highlight both positives and negatives of the rulers – but that application shouldn’t be selective.
And I suspect, once the religious markers are masked, there won’t be much difference between rulers across race, religion and gender.
Great piece. Never forget this history…the real history. Dudette ashok says not to stir up but he doesn’t realize the problem of miseducation that he qas our through. We need more such balanced and nuanced perspective,.exploration amd exposition, of facts that 6gis civilization has had to endure.
Mr.ashok, Satyameva Jayate nanritam. Truth Always Triumphs whether you like it or not, whether you want to rake it up or not, whether you want to be aware or not
Do not stir the settled sediment of history. Some things should be left to Ms Romila Thapar. Or Professor Ramchandra Guha. India has crushing problems, none of which will get resolved by setting different communities on edge. There are so many well documented atrocities from what may be called “ the other side “, after Mughal rule concluded.
The author seems to be living in an alternate reality — jihad, extraction, and imperial plunder are practically all India has heard of the Mughals in recent years.