It is necessary to break the spell of socialist dogma on the imagination of those attracted by its Utopia as the only scientific way of progress, wrote MA Venkatarao in 1963.
An Indian Hitler will have to be exceptionally lucky to survive for any length of time. This much hope ought to be enough for seekers of liberty and equality, wrote Sharad Anantrao Joshi, president of Swatantra Bharat Paksh party, in 1995.
Our brand of socialism did not result in transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor but only from the honest rich to the dishonest rich, lawyer-jurist Nani A Palkhivala said in 1991.
‘If socialism does not serve the purposes for which it was intended, that is, moving towards a freer and more equal society, is liberalism the alternative?’ wrote Minoo Masani in 1966.
In effect, the call for the removal of ‘Secular’ and ‘Socialist’ from the Preamble is against the constitutional mandate. Any attempt in that direction would lead to constitutional erosion.
Speaking to ThePrint, the BJP leader & RSS member also highlights changing global order & India's need to invest in research & tech in a world where wars are no longer fought on the ground.
Earlier, RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale had said that during the Emergency, the 2 terms were forcibly inserted into the Constitution, a move that needs to be reconsidered.
Zohran Mamdani’s faith, support for Gaza, dislike of Modi and Netanyahu are reasons why many in India are unhappy to see his rise rather than celebrate it as another ‘Indian’ conquest.
Hosabale says Congress must apologise for the Emergency and excesses committed under Indira Gandhi’s watch. ‘Those who did such things are today moving around with copy of the Constitution.’
The Libertarian Party of India, launched in Panchkula last year, wants to take a chainsaw to red tape, high taxes, caste politics, and state intrusions on personal freedom.
If we get this right, the citizen of 2047 will experience government as ambient and humane. Benefits arrive when needed without forms; grievances resolve in hours.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
Since 1815, Nepali Gorkhas have served in Indian & British Armies, as well as in Bihar, Bengal & Assam Police. Since Agnipath scheme came in, no Nepal-domiciled Gorkha has enlisted.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
Cut to eighty years later. How much privatisation has taken place in the last eleven years. Ask anyone in the SME sector how easy it is to do business in India today.
Even though this article was written in 1960s I still think what is written here deserves a dislike and I wish Print would understand this request of mine. Secondly, Nehru and the Congress belonged to the period of that era which just came out of the exploitive rule of the Raj and what were the policies of Raj? I don’t think I have to describe them. So Nehru did what he had to do cause he was in an era where majority of the population was uneducated and under poverty who were exploited by the Raj. During that era Socialism was the famous idea especially due to the success of USSR. The author talked about how they decided pre independence that Socialism would be the policy to move forward with and gives example of abolition of landownership was a dictatorial act rather than democratic and this is the most absurd and bullshit statement ever made. I guess the author never knew of the Karachi Session of the Congress and how is the abolition of zamindaris who were a tool of the Raj who actually forced people to pay and never actually worked or invested in the land dictatorial? Like how stupid can you be? Well maybe the author was angry that he lost his land and could not exploit his dear Indians anymore. He talks allot of things but says nothing just technical jargon to sound intellectual. He could have made an argument about how Nehru could have done something else but he makes stupid arguments.
Outdated neoliberal understanding which stands completely exposed in the current world when under our very eye the alternative system, i.e. neoliberal western world constructed on the rampant loot and plunder of global south is crumbling.
Jawaharlal Nehru singlehandedly led India into socialist misery. To give the readers an idea about how much did we suffer because of socialism, Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar mentions, “India has suffered a major human tragedy because of its prolonged experiment with socialism, and its delay in introducing economic reforms that accelerated growth. The most horrifying consequence has been 14.5 million ‘missing children’. Almost as bad are the 261 million ‘missing literates’ and 109 million ‘missing non-poor'”.
Cut to eighty years later. How much privatisation has taken place in the last eleven years. Ask anyone in the SME sector how easy it is to do business in India today.
Even though this article was written in 1960s I still think what is written here deserves a dislike and I wish Print would understand this request of mine. Secondly, Nehru and the Congress belonged to the period of that era which just came out of the exploitive rule of the Raj and what were the policies of Raj? I don’t think I have to describe them. So Nehru did what he had to do cause he was in an era where majority of the population was uneducated and under poverty who were exploited by the Raj. During that era Socialism was the famous idea especially due to the success of USSR. The author talked about how they decided pre independence that Socialism would be the policy to move forward with and gives example of abolition of landownership was a dictatorial act rather than democratic and this is the most absurd and bullshit statement ever made. I guess the author never knew of the Karachi Session of the Congress and how is the abolition of zamindaris who were a tool of the Raj who actually forced people to pay and never actually worked or invested in the land dictatorial? Like how stupid can you be? Well maybe the author was angry that he lost his land and could not exploit his dear Indians anymore. He talks allot of things but says nothing just technical jargon to sound intellectual. He could have made an argument about how Nehru could have done something else but he makes stupid arguments.
Outdated neoliberal understanding which stands completely exposed in the current world when under our very eye the alternative system, i.e. neoliberal western world constructed on the rampant loot and plunder of global south is crumbling.
Jawaharlal Nehru singlehandedly led India into socialist misery. To give the readers an idea about how much did we suffer because of socialism, Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar mentions, “India has suffered a major human tragedy because of its prolonged experiment with socialism, and its delay in introducing economic reforms that accelerated growth. The most horrifying consequence has been 14.5 million ‘missing children’. Almost as bad are the 261 million ‘missing literates’ and 109 million ‘missing non-poor'”.