Rashtrakutas raided the Himalayas, Tamil Nadu; the Cholas Bengal, Indonesia; Kashmiris Punjab, Afghanistan, and Xinjiang. Medieval Indians had a big appetite for conquests.
This special edition of Cut The Clutter, straight from the Siliguri corridor, details the strategic importance of the narrow strip of land in West Bengal, and how it’s a vital link connecting the Northeast to the rest of India.
We now live in a world order that will keep shifting. India must use this window. This also means we remain disciplined enough not to be knee-jerked into reacting to what Pakistan sees as its moment in the sun.
Flawed arguments. The most recent migration to Bangaluru differs from the earlier ones as instead of migrants adapting and respecting the culture of their hosts, they want to impose their culture and values on the hosts. Also, they have not come to settle and treat Bangaluru as their home. They just want to exploit it and move on
ALL i can see in this article is the AGENDA of an outsider claiming Bengaluru. He narrated this article in such a way that people who came to Bengaluru for work and settled here are claiming Bengaluru belongs to them. such an anti- Kannadiga and BIASED article. This article proves why Kannadigas need to stand up now otherwise this outsiders will claim every part of the Karnataka.
OUTSIDERS : PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT NATIVE TO THE PLACE (this is for those who will come and blabber that I’M Indian i have right to stay anywhere in the country. yes i know this rights. but that doesn’t make you guys native people)…
You are one idiot, Our past kingdom tells our history. Your entire Andhra ruled by Krishnadevaraya. I want to ask Print how can you tell outsider from Andhra to make article on Karnataka
It belongs to kannadigas, period, the settlement was done in 1956 with states re organisation act , don’t peddle non sense , every state has right to protect its citizens,
Where were you where when other neighbour stated did the same. 1000 years back every region was different and languages were different. if we go back 2000 years back also and so on…..
Flawed arguments. The most recent migration to Bangaluru differs from the earlier ones as instead of migrants adapting and respecting the culture of their hosts, they want to impose their culture and values on the hosts. Also, they have not come to settle and treat Bangaluru as their home. They just want to exploit it and move on
ALL i can see in this article is the AGENDA of an outsider claiming Bengaluru. He narrated this article in such a way that people who came to Bengaluru for work and settled here are claiming Bengaluru belongs to them. such an anti- Kannadiga and BIASED article. This article proves why Kannadigas need to stand up now otherwise this outsiders will claim every part of the Karnataka.
OUTSIDERS : PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT NATIVE TO THE PLACE (this is for those who will come and blabber that I’M Indian i have right to stay anywhere in the country. yes i know this rights. but that doesn’t make you guys native people)…
You are one idiot, Our past kingdom tells our history. Your entire Andhra ruled by Krishnadevaraya. I want to ask Print how can you tell outsider from Andhra to make article on Karnataka
Agenda peddler. Typical migrant parasitic behaviour. Filled with half truths, lies and absolute horse shit.
It belongs to kannadigas, period, the settlement was done in 1956 with states re organisation act , don’t peddle non sense , every state has right to protect its citizens,
Where were you where when other neighbour stated did the same. 1000 years back every region was different and languages were different. if we go back 2000 years back also and so on…..