Imtiaz Ali's Main Vaapas Aaunga isn’t your typical Partition film. It isn’t about victimhood, or a yearning to return to the homeland or about people caught in harrowing cycles of hate. It is more complex.
A major 2025 analysis by researchers at University College London found that occupational complexity accounted for 73 per cent of lowered dementia risk.
What you can truly leave behind is the love, kindness, affection, goodwill, generosity, and the lasting memories as an individual during your short stay on earth, writes Vaidyanathan Subramanian.
There should be a public health advisory before every World Cup knockout game in which Argentina plays. And, Lionel Messi needs to stop giving his fans panic attacks.
Rather than open offices in India, many UK firms are strengthening India teams & partnerships to meet expected demand for advice on international disputes, arbitration & regulatory matters.
Ottawa has handed over execution functions of critical defence projects to a CEO-led organisation for reducing procurement timelines and making it solely accountable for outcomes.
The Congress party’s abandonment of nationalism is the most intriguing aspect of its post-2014 politics. The real Congress was never a party of bleeding heart pacifists.
Imtiaz Ali showing Hindu and Sikh retaliatory violence without adequately establishing the provocation, the trigger, the sequence of events is a form of false equivalence. It’s the classic whataboutery move dressed as balance.
Genuine historical honesty would require showing what came first — Direct Action Day, the League’s deliberate instigation, the systematic targeting.
The sequence matters because reaction without showing the provocation that caused it is manipulation not balance.
Proportionality matters too — who organized it, who had political backing, who had state support.
Showing Hindu and Sikh violence without that context creates a false picture. It implies spontaneous communal savagery rather than communities defending themselves under extreme provocation after suffering enormous losses.
Real honesty about Partition requires showing the full sequence. Instead Ali made a selective morality tale dressed as history.
And the question worth asking Imtiaz Ali directly is simple:
Why does your courage always seem to flow in one direction?
A memory studies scholar who doesn’t interrogate the historical accuracy of what’s being remembered has left the most important question unasked. By her own framework…memory is shaped by what gets included and excluded …the real question is what Imtiaz Ali deliberately excluded.
She’s admired the architecture without checking the foundation
Imtiaz Ali showing Hindu and Sikh retaliatory violence without adequately establishing the provocation, the trigger, the sequence of events is a form of false equivalence. It’s the classic whataboutery move dressed as balance.
Genuine historical honesty would require showing what came first — Direct Action Day, the League’s deliberate instigation, the systematic targeting.
The sequence matters because reaction without showing the provocation that caused it is manipulation not balance.
Proportionality matters too — who organized it, who had political backing, who had state support.
Showing Hindu and Sikh violence without that context creates a false picture. It implies spontaneous communal savagery rather than communities defending themselves under extreme provocation after suffering enormous losses.
Real honesty about Partition requires showing the full sequence. Instead Ali made a selective morality tale dressed as history.
And the question worth asking Imtiaz Ali directly is simple:
Why does your courage always seem to flow in one direction?
A memory studies scholar who doesn’t interrogate the historical accuracy of what’s being remembered has left the most important question unasked. By her own framework…memory is shaped by what gets included and excluded …the real question is what Imtiaz Ali deliberately excluded.
She’s admired the architecture without checking the foundation