The account of the India-US trade deal being a threat to India-Russia ties relies on a historically fixed and emotional understanding of India-Soviet/Russian ties.
ThePrint had previously reported that India & Russia are talking about 5 more regiments of the S-400, but no contracts are to be signed during the Russian president's visit.
At ThePrint’s Off The Cuff, Russian Ambassador to India Denis Alipov said tariff barriers on both sides have restricted the scope of India-Russia trade, an issue they are trying to resolve.
Strongly criticising use of tariffs & sanctions on countries keeping ties with Russia, the minister indicated that the end to conflict can only be achieved via diplomatic means.
External Affairs Minister made the comments while in Moscow for a three-day visit. US administration officials have actively hit out at India’s purchase of Russian oil in recent days.
New Delhi: Amid the continued social media outbursts by President Donald Trump, India Friday said that the bilateral ties have “weathered several transitions and...
In a seminal work, former military officers Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda & Lt. Col. Pavithran Rajan put forth a framework to approach cognitive warfare, called Socio-Technical-Cognitive Battlespace.
India, China and Russia share more contradictions than congruence. Each has a different worldview, as also a different adversary. The rude fact is that BRICS is the most irrelevant of all such groupings.
This is a valuable analysis of what the adversary thinks of India. The article series cover the opinions of most of the stakeholders in China.
Know thy enemy is fundamental to handle Chanakyan principles.
China thinks this, China commented that, China said so… Are these called news? The Chinese always look down upon Indians and many of its neighbours. It made friendship with Pakistan not because it genuinely thinks of Pakistan as a great country, but to hurt India. So why care what the Chinese think of an Indian action. I request The print to stop such weekly articles from Sana. If anything she should report about events in China, not what they think.
This is a valuable analysis of what the adversary thinks of India. The article series cover the opinions of most of the stakeholders in China.
Know thy enemy is fundamental to handle Chanakyan principles.
China thinks this, China commented that, China said so… Are these called news? The Chinese always look down upon Indians and many of its neighbours. It made friendship with Pakistan not because it genuinely thinks of Pakistan as a great country, but to hurt India. So why care what the Chinese think of an Indian action. I request The print to stop such weekly articles from Sana. If anything she should report about events in China, not what they think.