A two-judge bench ruled that the ‘marriage of a Hindu female with a Muslim male’ is ‘neither valid nor void, but is merely an irregular (fasid) marriage’.
There’s something very unsettling about seeing Priyanka Chopra talk about choice and agency while wearing sindoor and choodas.
Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas’ extravagant Jodhpur wedding has been...
The kinds of revisions we’re seeing remove the very skills that make historical thinking meaningful. The result is a citizen who either dismisses history entirely or defends it without support.
Indian toymakers are now exploring new markets, but they want govt to negotiate a trade deal with US soon, introduce incentives and subsidies to make the industry more competitive.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
It is clear through SC that Islam can never reconcile with Hindism. It demands conversion for social integration through marriage. Voluntarily or forcibly. Do we such religion in Hindu India? Is it not an affront to the very idea of Hinduism?
It is clear through SC that Islam can never reconcile with Hindism. It demands conversion for social integration through marriage. Voluntarily or forcibly. Do we such religion in Hindu India? Is it not an affront to the very idea of Hinduism?