The judge's rebuke of a female advocate & comments calling an area in Bangalore 'Pakistan' have gone viral on social media. The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the matter.
Some of his judgments include using the tying of a rakhi as bail condition for a man accused of outraging woman's modesty & directing an 'abusive' man to live with his wife, among others.
Rohit Arya is also known for giving bail to a man accused of outraging the modesty of a woman on the condition that he tie a rakhi and promise to protect her.
In his letter to the Delhi Police, Justice Gaurang Kanth said he lost his pet dog due to security personnel’s failure in locking the door of his residence.
In ‘Syed Mahmood: Colonial India’s Dissenting Judge’, Mohammad Nasir and Samreen Ahmed chronicle how India’s first Muslim judge left an Eastern mark on the Western world.
Former civil judge Anil Gaur claims he’s a victim of collusion between a lawyer and the SC judge, who was administrative judge in Panchkula in 2007, when he was dismissed.
This is the transcript of Ep 1830 of Cut the Clutter, where Shekhar Gupta explains why strategic petroleum reserves are a national necessity & how India compares with China, US & Japan.
Tracked and wheeled variants, built in collaboration with Tata Advanced Systems and Bharat Forge, carry 30mm turrets, cross water using hydro jets, and are 65% indigenous.
American objectives are unmet. They neither have muscle nor motivation to resume the war. As for Iran, the regime didn’t just survive, it’s now led by more radical individuals.
One can understand the anger over the misogynistic remarks directed at the lady advocate. But why take umbrage over the “Mysuru Road auto” remark? He just stated the obvious truth.
The situation is the same across all Muslim dominated localities in India. Why should the truth be accused of falling foul of the Indian Constitution. If the Constitution falls foul w.r.t to the truth, then the Constitution is at fault. Not the truth.
If anyone beeds proof of what the judge said, I request them to visit the area in question and spend an hour there. They can see and hear things for thenselves.
One can understand the anger over the misogynistic remarks directed at the lady advocate. But why take umbrage over the “Mysuru Road auto” remark? He just stated the obvious truth.
The situation is the same across all Muslim dominated localities in India. Why should the truth be accused of falling foul of the Indian Constitution. If the Constitution falls foul w.r.t to the truth, then the Constitution is at fault. Not the truth.
If anyone beeds proof of what the judge said, I request them to visit the area in question and spend an hour there. They can see and hear things for thenselves.