Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang said that the BRI initiative does not involve territorial and maritime disputes unlike what India has understood of it.
Need for foreign aid can often turn nations into battlegrounds for big global players at the cost of their own interests, says a study by Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Here’s what’s happening across the border: Pakistan analysts have a lot to say about India's move to cancel meeting ahead of UNGA; CPEC now finds its way to Cairo.
M Narendra Modi, in an oblique reference to the BRI, said any mega connectivity project must respect sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries involved.
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Billed as the military’s own version of Raisina Dialogue, the event will spotlight on tech-driven warfighting, lessons from Operation Sindoor and release of three new doctrines.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
BRI is even good for Europe. But India is led by nitwits. That’s been the case since its creation;but the downward slide has gotten worse as population has ballooned while leadership quality has declined. Everyone want to do superficial things to get great results. Sorry! The results will be pitiful as they have been.
The writer himself has provided answers to his questions that (1) India don’t have economic leverage and (2) lack of diplomatic capacity, as the reasons for the present situation….. For this (1) India need heavy industrialization continuously for next 15-20 years for its growth and (2) training methods may be improved to its bureacracy according to changed international atmosphere…
BRI is even good for Europe. But India is led by nitwits. That’s been the case since its creation;but the downward slide has gotten worse as population has ballooned while leadership quality has declined. Everyone want to do superficial things to get great results. Sorry! The results will be pitiful as they have been.
The writer himself has provided answers to his questions that (1) India don’t have economic leverage and (2) lack of diplomatic capacity, as the reasons for the present situation….. For this (1) India need heavy industrialization continuously for next 15-20 years for its growth and (2) training methods may be improved to its bureacracy according to changed international atmosphere…