Bihar is widely panned for an inefficient administration and lack of development. But the conundrum is that the same administration has ensured a peaceful era.
Peter Manuel's ‘Cassette Culture’ showed the booming Bhakti music during the '80s and '90s when Anoop Jalota, Gulshan Kumar achieved success by singing the sanitised Bhajans.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
The Writer is spot on : communal riots are created by the upper castes politicians to keep alive the hindu vs Muslim binary so as to deflect the attention of the Bahujans from their real enemies the bamman, Bania & Thakur trio . Nowadays anybody who exposes the upper castes devious plans is dubbed as communist or paki ….
There were brutal caste wars raging throughout rural Bihar in the 1990’s, which were instigated and encouraged by the Lalu Yadav administration. Entire villages of people were massacred in fights between armed Maoist Dalits and upper caste militias which formed to defend themselves. Muslim and Yadav gangsters aligned with Lalu Yadav’s RJD were given the green light to commit extortions and murders against all other communities, with a guarantee that a corrupted justice system would never hold them accountable. There is no society that was as polarized on communal lines as was 1990’s Lalu Yadav run Bihar.
These are all stupid and biased psedo liberal journalist who take money and spit poison. These sick minded journalist has already made India’s journalism not to mention at its “highest peak” in the global scenario. Bihar has been always the target state to motivate their self upper status agenda. Time is powerful, like hitler all you pseudo journalist will fall on face and I will be there to do your reporting. Best of luck for bullshit journalism.
If the print and other leftist media don’t try and create hatred by propagating their pseudo secular and pseudo liberal ideologies peace will easily prevail anywhere across. By the way RJD has already hired the PRINT to campaign for the upcoming election. The ludicrous analysis by the author makes is feel so
The author is either ignorant or biased or both. After ayodhya structure destruction riots erupted in Bihar. Then Chief Minister Lalu Yadav saw his throne shaking. He requested and was able to convince Muslims, Yadavs and Rajputs, who were generally Lalu’s vote bank not to fight. M-Y equation is still more or less intact in his favour. Nitish, too, tries to keep muslims in good humor.
.
No need for such deep analysis to understand the reason. When a group becomes too strong to fight with, no conflict happens. Lalu and Nitish ensured that Muslims becomes so strong. Watch few symptoms..Ramnawami julus as well as Tazia can go on route which are allowed by Muslims. Hindus are leaving areas dominated by Muslims but other way it doesnot. Kishenganj and Katihar are best ex. All by govt support. My feeling is that it is silence before storm.
Same way as no riot happened in UP. Riots happen when minorities think they can get away or atleast inflict equal damage. Thats why no riots in many Asian countries. Here role media plays is important .If balanced reporting was run on Shaheen Bagh riots may not have happened. Only 1 in 20 mentioned inconvenience or this could result in violence.
Navendu kumar’s opinion appears to be more plausible. It may be just that the Muslims have realised that it is futile attempt to browbeat Hindus in Bihar. In Bihar both Hindus and Muslims keep Tamanchas in their possession. And experience of last 70 years have shown that Muslims suffer more . The case in Gujarat, Hyderabad is different. Till recently Muslims were dominant in those areas. Let us see what happens after – if at all- Taliban comes to power in Afghanistan.
Writer has rightly pointed out that Lalu and Nitish both are eying Muslims 16% vote. Since both of them are from OBC class, they never harboured enmity with Muslims, as is the case with most upper caste Hindu leaders. Had they belonged to upper caste community, they couldn’t sustain the pressure of their community. One key point writer didn’t mention is population of upper caste in Bihar, it’s just 15%, which has lost the teeth in administration to bite anyone. Everything put together had kept the Bihar peaceful.
The writer is professor? The bihar is a casteist den, which helps the arabi follower, as Indics like Hindus are divided too much on caste nonsense. Once Mandal era drama grows, we will see a new churning based on religion
Sir,
I strongly believe more prosperous you are , more bigot you become as you begin to believe the deity has made you rich.
Then these rich spend millions in making religious places irrespective of all religions. They become more hard core, fundamental.
Saudi Arabian prosperity made it leader of WAHABI Islam.
Most, not all, of Gujjus are very very communal, the reason is prosperity.
Manmohan Singh era made them ultra rich but they tilted towards hard core.
Bihar once rich will behave like Gujjus.
Sure.
Excellent analysis with comparison of Saudi Analogy. Bihar is one of the feudalistic state which slowly transforms into socialist character post Mandal Era. The Backward Class assertion over Upper Caste Bumihars has made it possible for Bihar to maintain a communal hormony.
The Writer is spot on : communal riots are created by the upper castes politicians to keep alive the hindu vs Muslim binary so as to deflect the attention of the Bahujans from their real enemies the bamman, Bania & Thakur trio . Nowadays anybody who exposes the upper castes devious plans is dubbed as communist or paki ….
There were brutal caste wars raging throughout rural Bihar in the 1990’s, which were instigated and encouraged by the Lalu Yadav administration. Entire villages of people were massacred in fights between armed Maoist Dalits and upper caste militias which formed to defend themselves. Muslim and Yadav gangsters aligned with Lalu Yadav’s RJD were given the green light to commit extortions and murders against all other communities, with a guarantee that a corrupted justice system would never hold them accountable. There is no society that was as polarized on communal lines as was 1990’s Lalu Yadav run Bihar.
This is wrong analysis in 1992 Sitamarhi riot is well known where muslim attack on Durga Pooja idol immersion.
These are all stupid and biased psedo liberal journalist who take money and spit poison. These sick minded journalist has already made India’s journalism not to mention at its “highest peak” in the global scenario. Bihar has been always the target state to motivate their self upper status agenda. Time is powerful, like hitler all you pseudo journalist will fall on face and I will be there to do your reporting. Best of luck for bullshit journalism.
Same on u. U must have choosen some other context to represent Bihar.
If the print and other leftist media don’t try and create hatred by propagating their pseudo secular and pseudo liberal ideologies peace will easily prevail anywhere across. By the way RJD has already hired the PRINT to campaign for the upcoming election. The ludicrous analysis by the author makes is feel so
The author is either ignorant or biased or both. After ayodhya structure destruction riots erupted in Bihar. Then Chief Minister Lalu Yadav saw his throne shaking. He requested and was able to convince Muslims, Yadavs and Rajputs, who were generally Lalu’s vote bank not to fight. M-Y equation is still more or less intact in his favour. Nitish, too, tries to keep muslims in good humor.
.
No need for such deep analysis to understand the reason. When a group becomes too strong to fight with, no conflict happens. Lalu and Nitish ensured that Muslims becomes so strong. Watch few symptoms..Ramnawami julus as well as Tazia can go on route which are allowed by Muslims. Hindus are leaving areas dominated by Muslims but other way it doesnot. Kishenganj and Katihar are best ex. All by govt support. My feeling is that it is silence before storm.
And, the caste wars under LALUA ?
Same way as no riot happened in UP. Riots happen when minorities think they can get away or atleast inflict equal damage. Thats why no riots in many Asian countries. Here role media plays is important .If balanced reporting was run on Shaheen Bagh riots may not have happened. Only 1 in 20 mentioned inconvenience or this could result in violence.
Intersting analysis. What about WB? after huge violence post partition, WB has been relatively clam for decades – same reasons?
Navendu kumar’s opinion appears to be more plausible. It may be just that the Muslims have realised that it is futile attempt to browbeat Hindus in Bihar. In Bihar both Hindus and Muslims keep Tamanchas in their possession. And experience of last 70 years have shown that Muslims suffer more . The case in Gujarat, Hyderabad is different. Till recently Muslims were dominant in those areas. Let us see what happens after – if at all- Taliban comes to power in Afghanistan.
Writer has rightly pointed out that Lalu and Nitish both are eying Muslims 16% vote. Since both of them are from OBC class, they never harboured enmity with Muslims, as is the case with most upper caste Hindu leaders. Had they belonged to upper caste community, they couldn’t sustain the pressure of their community. One key point writer didn’t mention is population of upper caste in Bihar, it’s just 15%, which has lost the teeth in administration to bite anyone. Everything put together had kept the Bihar peaceful.
The writer is professor? The bihar is a casteist den, which helps the arabi follower, as Indics like Hindus are divided too much on caste nonsense. Once Mandal era drama grows, we will see a new churning based on religion
Sir,
I strongly believe more prosperous you are , more bigot you become as you begin to believe the deity has made you rich.
Then these rich spend millions in making religious places irrespective of all religions. They become more hard core, fundamental.
Saudi Arabian prosperity made it leader of WAHABI Islam.
Most, not all, of Gujjus are very very communal, the reason is prosperity.
Manmohan Singh era made them ultra rich but they tilted towards hard core.
Bihar once rich will behave like Gujjus.
Sure.
Excellent analysis with comparison of Saudi Analogy. Bihar is one of the feudalistic state which slowly transforms into socialist character post Mandal Era. The Backward Class assertion over Upper Caste Bumihars has made it possible for Bihar to maintain a communal hormony.
Read “Breaking India” book and avoid falling in traps of these Paid & Biased Journalists who are doing bidding of their foreign overlords to fulfill their communist agenda of Balkanising India.
https://www.amazon.in/Breaking-India-Interventions-Dravidian-Faultlines/dp/8191067374
Totally false premise