A senior Kashmiri official of the Jammu & Kashmir govt said any move to tinker with Article 35A will create a law and order situation that 'will be difficult to control'.
Ahead of Lok Sabha elections, Omar Abdullah speaks to ThePrint on several issues, including impact of Pulwama attack on Kashmir, alliances and Pakistan.
The plea says the special provision was "temporary" and lapsed with the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly in 1957.
New Delhi: A PIL...
The last time this matter flared up was when Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a very similar directive in April, called for the relocation of stray dogs in the capital.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
What I find funny that all these people here, specially Mr. Beg are twisting facts. Article 370 is a temporary provision in the Constitution and article 35A isn’t even part of it. It was inserted by Nehru by a presidential order. For how long this temporary provision should survive in our Constitution? So removing article 370 isn’t illegal. Besides 35A does gender discrimination so it has to go away. All the Kashmir political parties are interested in their hegemony and fuelling anti-India feelings openly. When people here are saying that BJP should focus on employment, they should remember that these Kashmiri politicians openly say that Kashmir problem isn’t a administrative problem but it’s a political problem. Now are we kidding… And also employment can’t come if there is no private investment in J&K which doesn’t happen because of the article 370. Let valley people go to and merge with Pakistan and “enjoy” their rights especially NC and PDP politicians. We can keep Jammu and Ladakh which want to be with India anyway.
What I find funny that all these people here, specially Mr. Beg are twisting facts. Article 370 is a temporary provision in the Constitution and article 35A isn’t even part of it. It was inserted by Nehru by a presidential order. For how long this temporary provision should survive in our Constitution? So removing article 370 isn’t illegal. Besides 35A does gender discrimination so it has to go away. All the Kashmir political parties are interested in their hegemony and fuelling anti-India feelings openly. When people here are saying that BJP should focus on employment, they should remember that these Kashmiri politicians openly say that Kashmir problem isn’t a administrative problem but it’s a political problem. Now are we kidding… And also employment can’t come if there is no private investment in J&K which doesn’t happen because of the article 370. Let valley people go to and merge with Pakistan and “enjoy” their rights especially NC and PDP politicians. We can keep Jammu and Ladakh which want to be with India anyway.