Saturday, 2 July, 2022
HomeOpinionWhy 2019 is more about Amit Shah than Narendra Modi

Why 2019 is more about Amit Shah than Narendra Modi

Text Size:

The acid test of 2019 will tell if Amit Shah is really the Chanakya he is said to be.

There’s an amazing consensus these days, across political and ideological divides, that the BJP is likely to win around 200 seats or so in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Add the NDA allies to that, and the BJP should easily be back in the treasury benches. Recent opinion polls also suggest this as the likely scenario.

Some feel that without a majority, Narendra Modi can’t be Prime Minister. The alliance will demand a change of guard. Modi has been the ruthless strongman that small parties don’t like. People within his own party also feel diminished by the centralisation of power in the Prime Minister’s Office. Such critics underestimate the ability of Modi to be a pragmatist when he needs to be, and his ability to woo people when he needs them. The best example is how he got the opposition’s big hope, Nitish Kumar, to join the NDA last year.

Also read: Modi-Shah-Bhagwat play good cop-bad cop to win 2019 elections

The precedents of past coalition governments tell us that Modi is safe even if the BJP’s 2014 tally gets reduced by 110, and comes down to 172. Allies and regional parties are more transactional than anything else. In exchange for plum ministries, they’ll be happy to work with Modi, asserting themselves more than they did earlier.

Even if the BJP loses a third of its 282 seats, credit will go to Brand Modi for staying on top despite double anti-incumbency in most of the country. If people are willing to vote Modi back to power even though they can’t list a single concrete achievement of his government, that will only be thanks to the charisma and popularity of the Prime Minister.

Chanakyaneeti or plain luck?

However, losing a third of the 2014 tally will make a lot of people question whether party president Amit Shah is really the ‘Chanakya’ he has been made out to be. Amit Shah’s smart strategies, his supporters argue, have led to the BJP’s victories as much as Brand Modi. We have been told a lot of stories about Amit Shah’s booth management, his check-mating of rivals with clever campaigns, his no-nonsense approach to getting things done, his cracking the whip to make party colleagues burn the midnight lamp, his ability to create an aura of invincibility around his party, and his micro-caste games coupled with good, old communal polarisation.

But there are Amit Shah sceptics too. It is possible to make a case that Amit Shah is a manager and an executor gifted with very lucky circumstances. These circumstances are: Brand Modi, the RSS cadre, and a rudderless Congress party. If you have these three things coming together, do you really need to be a Chanakya?

Also read: Why Amit Shah and BJP’s Mission 350 for 2019 looks unreal

Furthermore, Amit Shah has been the bad cop in the Modi-Shah duo. It is Amit Shah whose wrath allies and disgruntled party leaders are known to face. He is not the RSS’ own man either. The RSS usually likes to have one of their own as party president, something they tried to do after the 2014 results but failed under Modi’s pressure.

Acid test

For these reasons, the 2019 elections are more about Amit Shah than Narendra Modi. In 2014, Amit Shah managed only the critical state of Uttar Pradesh. But now he’s the party’s national president, and a wildly successful one. His biggest challenge yet is the 2019 general election. Narendra Modi still gets very high ratings, not least because ‘There Is No Alternative’. This is Amit Shah’s moment to shine, to show he really is a modern-day Chanakya.

It’s relatively easy to be a challenger and present every election as a revolution in the making. It’s tough to beat anti-incumbency, especially given the Himalayan expectations raised by the Modi campaign in 2014. The BJP’s victories in state after state present the challenge of double anti-incumbency before it. Some attrition in the BJP’s vote-share is expected. After all, the BJP can’t possibly win every single seat in Gujarat and Rajasthan the way it did last time in 2014. It is definitely not going to win 70+ of 80 seats in Uttar Pradesh.

If the BJP has to return to power with a clear majority of its own, where will the seats come from? Will minor increases in east India (West Bengal, Odisha, Assam) really make up for the losses in other states?

Also read: BJP’s Mission 2024: Prime Minister Amit Shah?

That is the challenge before Amit Shah. Modi may manage to return to 7, Lok Kalyan Marg by appeasing some regional satraps. But questions will be asked of Amit Shah and his supposed invincibility. His position as party president may become untenable, but he’s already a Rajya Sabha member and could be made a top minister in the Modi government. He does have such ambitions himself. Nevertheless, he may find it difficult to retain that halo around him.

(Obligatory disclaimer: This assessment is based on the current political environment. Things could change a lot over the next six months – in any direction.)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Shivam Vij is star clown of the circus that is Print lolololol. “200 seats consensus across ideological divide” my ass. Idiot of supreme calibre lmao

  2. Whether they win or loose ppl will decide. Y a Congress funded media like yours is reporting a not so neutral article? Y are u guys so worried n afraid of their second term ? What are your intentions here? Decide the nation n loot it once again like u n your masters did during the ten years of UPA rule?

  3. The sabarimalai episode proves how attention is diverted from key issues in the country. Only chanakia can plan such pilots.

  4. The lop sided and prejudiced article, as always, exhibits its anti- Modi stance , in this article. The uneqvuvocal statement “ they cant list a single concrete acievement of his Govt “, only shows the bird burying its head in the sands, without being dispassionate in assessing the performance of the Govt. One can only take the horse to the pond, but cannot make it drink. The one track mind ignores several achievements, like DEMONITISATION, GST, THE SURGICAL STRIKES, and more than all these, the FIRST TIME EVER , A GOVT AT THE CENTRE, WITHOUT EVEN A SINGLE CASE OF CORRUPTION, WITH ANY TANGIBLE PROOF, THE ATTEMPTS BEING MADE TO BOOK ALL THE CORRUPT IN UPA-2 , AND TRYING TO BRING TO BOOK LOAN DEFAULTERS OF PUBLUC SECTOR BANKS, which were virtually at the beck and call of the Central ministers in UPA 2. There is no pointing out such instances, as the magazine is quite well known for its antu-Modi stance.

  5. His heart is set on being CM of Gujarat. If there is a second term at the Centre, that would be a richly deserved reward.

  6. Modi back to power even though they can’t list a single concrete achievement of his government, This sentence clearly shows which side of the spectrum you are. Hence I do not consider this as a balanced view and stopped reading beyond that.

  7. Magicians were already engaged in election campaign, these magicians can do wonders to bend the voters and or to mend the machines.
    “Chanakya” never fails.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular