‘Modi’s ouster on 23 May will be India’s fitting reply to the most foul-mouthed PM’
Opinion

‘Modi’s ouster on 23 May will be India’s fitting reply to the most foul-mouthed PM’

‘Modi needs to be warned that he’s guilty of anti-national activity in trying to ride on sacrifices of Army & CRPF martyrs in a dirty election campaign,’ writes Mani Shankar Aiyar.

Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar at Parliament House

Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar | File Photo by Sanjeev Verma | Hindustan Times via Getty Images

I think I have discovered why Narendra Modi loathes Jawaharlal Nehru so much. Nehru had a degree in Natural Sciences from the University of Cambridge. It made him realise that to pull India and Indians out of superstition, from what Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore called “the dreary desert sands of dead habit”, modern India must cultivate a “scientific temper”, an expression that drives sanghis nuts because they like to believe the “udan khatolas” of mythology were the earliest F-16s to be invented by Hindus, and that Hindu plastic surgery, not a transplant operation, is what led to an elephant’s head surmounting Lord Ganesh. Both these stunningly illiterate claims come from the mouth of none less than the Prime Minister of our country, whose acquaintance with higher education has gone no further than lying about degrees from Delhi and Gujarat universities that he never got and who can obviously not tell a scientific proposition from a ‘dhokla’.

That, in itself, would not matter. For neither Indira Gandhi nor Rajiv Gandhi had a university degree and yet made good, perhaps even great, prime ministers. Statesmanship is not a civil services exam and it is not necessary to go to a university to reach the pinnacle of government. Perhaps the most famous example of that is Winston Churchill. But why lie about one’s educational qualifications – or lack of them? Unless, of course, such lying is a compulsive psychological disorder.

We have just heard from our Prime Minister (yes, he is the nation’s PM for another ten days or so) that he ordered the Indian Air Force to strike at Balakot despite heavy cloud cover because while senior Air Force officers were trembling their knees pleading for postponement of the strike till the weather improved, he (Modi) thumped his 56-inch chest and saw that heavy cloud cover was actually good for the Indian Air Force because Pakistani radar would not be able to penetrate thick black clouds.


Also read: ‘I am very much alive’, Mani Shankar Aiyar tells trolls claiming he ‘died in Balakot’


This is to insult our brave airmen and, above all, the Chief of Air Staff. Not one of them was so ignorant of the fact that radar is not a telescope whose vision can be clouded over. Radar is used precisely because, whatever the weather conditions, it can pinpoint incoming aircraft. Did Modi take his senior-most Air Force officers for fools that he could trot out such ridiculous unscientific rubbish before them? And were they so pusillanimous that they dared not correct such a vacuous Prime Minister?

This insult to our defence forces compounds another insult directed at senior officers of the Navy, who were involved in December 1987 in transporting Rajiv Gandhi, then Prime Minster of India, and his good lady from off-shore Thiruvananthapuram to the Lakshadweep islands to attend the Island Development Authority meeting. Admiral Laxminarayan Ramdas, then Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Southern Command, and later Chief of Naval Staff, has gone on record certifying that only Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi were on board INS Viraat when it sailed to Lakshadweep. Three other very senior Navy officers — Admirals Arun Prakash, Madanjit Singh and Vinod Pasricha- who had personal knowledge of the voyage because they were involved in the arrangements, including one who later become Chief of Naval Staff — have publicly affirmed that there were no foreigners on board the aircraft carrier.

If after four of the senior-most Naval officers have said so, does not decency demand that Modi withdraw the allegations he has made about Rajiv using the Indian Navy as a “personal taxi” to ferry “foreigners” to a holiday on one of the islands, Bangaram? How dare he cast aspersions on the patriotism of such distinguished veterans of our defence forces? Either Modi is lying or these four senior, if retired, naval officers are lying. How could two of them have been promoted to the rank of Chief of Naval Staff — the highest post that a naval officer could aspire to — if their record had been blotted by their allowing unauthorised foreigners to be on board a naval ship bristling with the latest in warfare technology?


Also read: Mani Shankar Aiyar’s ‘neech’ remark is hardly the game-changer BJP was looking for


Modi needs to be warned that he is guilty of anti-national activity in trying to ride on the sacrifices of our army and CRPF martyrs in a dirty election campaign; of defaming the Indian Air Force by portraying them as complaisant idiots in his scientific illiteracy; and the Indian Navy as being packed at its highest echelons with traitors who would acquiesce in unauthorised foreigners being allowed to board a top of the line defence vessel.

But then, why bother? Modi will, in any case, be ousted by the people of India on 23 May. That would be a fitting end to the most foul-mouthed prime minister this country has seen or is likely to see. Remember how I described him on 7 December 2017? Was I not prophetic?

The author is a Congress leader. Views are personal.

This article was originally published in Rising Kashmir and is being reproduced here with permission from the author.