Prime Minister Narendra Modi is going to address the centenary celebrations of the Aligarh Muslim University on 22 December. The event is online. If it wasn’t for Covid, he would likely be on campus. This is the first time since 1964 that a prime minister of India is going to address AMU. Fifty-six years is a long time, and except for Jawaharlal Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri, no other prime minister thought of visiting the university, even though Aligarh is only 120 km from the national capital, and AMU is a fully funded central university whose Visitor is the President of India.
The proposed address by PM Modi is a well-thought gesture full of symbolism. As he often emphasises, Modi is the prime minister of 130 crore Indians, which includes about 20 crore Muslims. He belongs to an ideological stream whose understanding of history is much different from how Muslims would look at India’s past and their role in it. Therefore, their idea of the present and the vision for the future remain equally contested.
Also read: Indian Muslims and liberals are trapped in a toxic relationship
Past without a closure
The Aligarh Muslim University has been a part of that contentious history, and must face up to its history in the spirit of truth and reconciliation. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, the founder of Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental (MAO) College, the institution which became AMU in 1920, is alleged to have propounded the two-nation theory. It’s another matter that if his successors had not totally buried his social and political ideas, alongside his religious thought, there was much in his speeches and writings to place him among the founders of composite nationalism.
It was the Muhammadan Educational Conference, the vehicle of the Aligarh Movement, which doubled up as the founding session of the Muslim League at Dhaka in 1906. MAO College hosted the League till 1912 before its headquarters were shifted to Lucknow. The politics of Muslim separatism was institutionalised in Aligarh, which, by the 1940s, had become, in Jinnah’s words, “the arsenal of Muslim India”. Later, poet Jaun Elia would quip that Pakistan was a prank played by the juveniles of Aligarh (“Pakistan — ye sab Aligarh ke laundoń ki shararat thi”).
That this practical joke, by its sheer thoughtless adventurism, turned out to be a monumental tragedy, which sundered the country into two and the Muslim community into three, is yet to be confronted by Aligarh. The inability to confront its past, and the ruse of feigning amnesia in this regard, has also led to the collateral forgetting of nationalist and progressive streams, which though not dominant, were nonetheless quite robust strands.
Also read: Indian Muslims must rewrite their victim mindset to be indispensable in India’s rise
AMU’s slide to backwardness
That this could happen despite the fact that AMU is endowed with a Centre of Advanced Study in History is even more surprising. History has to be written no matter what be one’s methodology, analytical tools, philosophical inclination and ideological orientation. Developing an Akbar-Aurangzeb centric school of history may be a noble endeavour, and nobler may be the zeal to argue how secular were the Muslim rulers — Aurangzeb being the most secular of them all — but expatiating on secular nationalism of people like Zakir Hussain and Mohammad Habib, in the face of frenzied communalism, would be much better if one didn’t fight shy of calling the mainstream Muslim communalism on the campus by its name.
This could not happen because post-Partition, Aligarh was reassured and rehabilitated, but not reformed. It reflects the high-mindedness of independent India’s leadership, how they protected and preserved AMU even as most of its faculty and students deserted it for the greener pasture of their conquest, Pakistan. An un-critiqued and un-reformed Aligarh would continue to inhabit the same narrative as earlier. Thus, despite its characteristic boast, Aligarh could not chart a path for modernity and progress of Indian Muslims and their integration and mainstreaming in the national life. The emotional chasm between the two communities kept widening despite the increasing commingling of people. And so, instead of giving intellectual leadership to the Muslim community, to which AMU considered itself traditionally entitled, and for which it is statutorily mandated by its founding Act, Aligarh chose the regressive path.
On such politically momentous issues as Shah Bano and Triple Talaq, despite having the material wherewithal to come up with its own progressive position, Aligarh’s intellectual sterility made it toe the line of the ulema and the reactionary Muslim Personal Law Board, the very people against whose thought the university was founded. It became complicit in the cultural regression and political alienation of the Muslim community, and could not intervene when a second separatist movement got underway in the name of identity. On the question of Babri Masjid, the Aligarh academia adopted the Leftist line of limited technical correctness, oblivious of the fact that the issue had far deeper implications for the Muslims than the Leftist arguments could see them through.
Also read: Hindutva to Sachar report — What Syed Ahmad Khan would have done today
A chance for reconciliation
Now that Prime Minister Modi, staunch in his own ideological position, is going to address AMU in a grand gesture of reaching out, its symbolism should not be lost on anyone. More so, as this moment comes not very long after the physical assaults and vicious propaganda against the university by Right-wing groups that swear allegiance to the Modi government. Stigmatising AMU over Jinnah’s portrait, which hung, among many others, in the student union’s building for he was an honorary member of it, was malicious, even as the arguments against removing it were too untenable to be sustained, too nuanced to be understood and too disingenuous to be given any credence.
Be that as it may, notwithstanding every imaginable criticism of AMU, the fact could not be ignored that this campus has the highest concentration of modern, educated Muslims anywhere in the world. So, even if it couldn’t realistically boast of being the intellectual vanguard of Indian Muslims, in sheer quantitative terms, and in view of its historical legacy, it has an unsurpassable symbolic value for the Muslim community.
Now that the prime minister is reaching out, should Aligarh, on behalf of the Muslims, not grasp the extended hand of friendship and reconciliation? It is for Aligarh to decide whether it would wean away Muslims from the path of confrontation, which, if not shunned, is bound to bring an unimaginable catastrophe, or to put them on the path of conciliation as Sir Syed did with the British.
An alumnus of AMU, Mukhtar Masood, mentions an anecdote in his book Awaz-e Dost, wherein some time after Independence, while addressing the governor of Uttar Pradesh, Sarojini Naidu, in the Union Hall, a student said, “Ya to hum aapke bade dushman hain ya chhote bhai hain (we are either your big enemy or little brother).” The reality is simpler than this. Muslims are neither. They are equal as Indians and citizens. Let this opportunity not be missed.
Najmul Hoda is an IPS officer. Views are personal.
Writer of this article proved himself right. The address of PM vindicated his reading of the context and connotation evident throughout the article. Excellent piece of writing with rare courage.
A Muslim is as good a citizen as any of his citizen brothers. He is interested in his present and future. His past : a native convert. Honourable P M, pl help him to overcome his educational and economic backwardness.
A person whose party has never accepted AMU on positive notes is expected to deliver speech. Indian Muslims are much better in AMU than any other area, institution. I think article is not justified
Mr Neil Bahut Bade wale ho tum kasam se. Try not to choke on your own poison.
This is the kind of journalism we want to see, thoughtful and balanced. not he same old leftist crap we have been fed all these years.
Anything which brings India’s two great communities together strengthens us as a nation, more harmonious and secure, better able to pursue development goals. However, it would be difficult to make the case that the Muslims are on a path of confrontation. Quite the contrary, in fact.
very thoughtful view express by author. Hats off.
What a crap ! The President of India was invited to the event and Modi’s office changed it to invite him. What an attention seeker.
It needs lot of courage to speak truth to either side of the power.
I hope PM’s speech writers take notice of this very timely article.
Good for the Print for giving platform to a person who is fiercely independent mind and free from ideological burdens.
i agree with you.
Excellent article. It needs lot of courage to speak truth to either side of the power.
I hope PM’s speech writers take notice of this very timely article.
Good for the Print as well for giving platform to people of independent mind and free from ideological burdens.
Reactions on of some of you closed-minded people on this well-thought and researched article show how negative you are about Indian Muslims and will never change this thought either… God save our country from such hate-mongers…
Very apt article. It is important that every section of the society in india must consider himself first as indian and then anything else. Every society in every country in the world has the same approach.
In india, thanks to Pakistan and history of its origin, a strange narrative has built up over the years. It is time to rebuild the national ethos. Modi’s speech tomorrow at AMU must be taken up in that spirit.
“On such politically momentous issues as Shah Bano and Triple Talaq, despite having the material wherewithal to come up with its own progressive position, Aligarh’s intellectual sterility made it toe the line of the ulema and the reactionary Muslim Personal Law Board, the very people against whose thought the university was founded.”
The writer has thankfully summoned up required courage to call a spade a spade!
very good article., but a waste of time, Indian Muslims will never change.
Author’s intent is to be applauded but like everyone else he needs a reality check.
Does he know the mawali maskins of this country really believe they are descendants arabs turks iran.
Does he know mawali maskin of this country believe in secularism until they are in minority.
Does he know mawali maskins of this country are ready to burn loot rape public and disobey civil laws to establish their unique identity.
Does he know that there are close to 500 wannabe Pakistan in this country Kerala and Bengal among them.
Does he know that mawali maskins of this country would be first to asunder this country again.
Mawali maskins of this country have too much control from media to movies.
From print to lyrics they control the phrases so much so that calling them kafirs, denigrating deities , mocking practices on reel life no one gives a hoot.
Author would be well advised to stop living in bubble and accept the reality that fundamental Islam of mawali maskin is threat to idea, fabric and secular nature of this country.
Wow. Such an article on this leftist rag. Times are changing. Kyon Shekhar Ji?
Comments are closed.