scorecardresearch
Friday, March 29, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeHealthModi govt's new vaccine strategy is bad economics. The only correct consumer...

Modi govt’s new vaccine strategy is bad economics. The only correct consumer price is zero

With its Rs 350 billion vaccination budget, it's the government that should be inoculating every Indian. Free of charge.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

After a tightly centralized vaccination drive that has delivered the required two shots to less than 2% of the population, India is opening up its inoculation strategy in the middle of a raging pandemic. Can the new approach flatten the curve?

Expanding the campaign to all adults below 45 starting next month is a late but welcome move. India’s daily infection rate of almost 350,000 is the worst any country has experienced. Even then, shifting a big part of the financial burden to 28 state governments and letting private hospitals buy shots at 600 to 1200 rupees ($8 to $16) apiece — and sell them to patients at even higher prices — are both wrong.

In a nation riddled with inequalities and swelling with 75 million newly impoverished after last year’s coronavirus lockdown, putting a price on any part of limited vaccine supplies could lead to unjust, lopsided distribution. Free, universal access, with New Delhi negotiating prices with at least four or five suppliers globally, could prepare India better for a third Covid-19 resurgence. Until herd immunity is achieved, private hospitals must continue acting as agents of the state, and impose only a limited markup on the stock they’re given free from the national pool.

It was a mistake to restrict the drive to just two Made-in-India vaccines: Covishield, the AstraZeneca Plc shot manufactured by the Pune-based Serum Institute of India Ltd., and Covaxin, an indigenously developed shot produced by the Hyderabad-based Bharat Biotech International Ltd. New Delhi managed to negotiate a competitive price of 150 rupees per shot, and then set out to distribute them free of charge — first to healthcare and other frontline workers and then to those older than 60. Only this month, the age restriction was lowered to 45. Covishield has accounted for roughly 90% of the 141 million doses administered so far. Nowhere near enough for a population of almost 1.4 billion.

The second wave has exposed the inadequacy of the tightfisted approach. A severe oxygen shortage is causing the healthcare system to collapse, forcing authorities to change tack: State governments and private hospitals can directly order up to 50% of Serum and Bharat’s supplies to inoculate the younger population, while New Delhi will buy the other half to complete free vaccination of those above 45. Serum has announced a price of 400 rupees for states, and 600 rupees for private hospitals. Bharat’s rates are 600 and 1200 rupees, respectively.

Maharashtra, the state most severely affected by the second wave, might join a growing number that have announced free vaccination for all adults, according to media reports. Suppose that all states — even the most resource-strapped ones — somehow find the money. The supply of vaccines is constrained. For a given 1 million doses, who will decide the allocation among states, and between those governments and a private hospital? When the antiviral remdesivir is selling on the black market at a 300% premium, risk of profiteering is very real.

The only correct consumer price is zero. After last year’s national lockdown, the urban poor are once again facing the brunt of lost livelihoods from localized curfews and all-pervasive fear. The world’s biggest democracy can’t shut anyone out of the market for vaccines. That may well happen if a state’s purchase order goes unfilled — even as doses are available at private hospitals at a price the poor can’t afford.

Maybe the supply crunch will ease. Russia’s Sputnik V, initially imported and then made locally, should be available by the end of next month. Other homemade options might take longer. Hyderabad-based Biological E Ltd., which is conducting clinical trials in India for an antigen developed by Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, has won U.S. funding to ramp up production capacity to 1 billion doses in India by the end of this year. States can also import shots in use globally at prices preset by their manufacturers. But given the worldwide supply constraints, it’s safe to assume that Serum’s hold isn’t going to reduce meaningfully soon. Introducing the logic of free markets into a situation that’s anything but makes no sense.

Without getting into a fruitless debate over what is a reasonable profit margin to spur production, three things should be clear. One, it’s the Indian government, with its 350 billion rupee vaccination budget, that should be inoculating everyone. Free of charge.

Two, while states don’t have any bargaining power against vaccine producers, New Delhi has plenty of carrots and sticks at its disposal. Bharat Biotech’s product has resulted from publicly funded research; it was authorized for emergency use even without Phase 3 clinical trial data. The government, albeit belatedly, is giving both Serum and Bharat financial assistance to ramp up production. Serum has also been subjected to export restrictions to help tide over a domestic shortage. Had the Modi administration put in large, confirmed orders with Serum — as well as with Pfizer Inc., Moderna Inc., and later, Johnson & Johnson — it could have held the blended price close to the originally negotiated 150 rupees apiece. Or at least closer than it would be now.

Finally, cutting corners on a subsidy that will cost less than 0.4% of gross domestic product could lead to output (and tax losses) many times higher. Daily fatalities are nearing 3,000 — and that’s a gross underestimate. After the current spike has peaked, people will still need to be inoculated at a rapid pace to flatten the curve and avert a third buildup. And that’s when the folly of charging $8 or $16 for a life-saving vaccine, in a country where the working class was struggling to buy  7-cent cookies even before the pandemic, may become clear.  – Bloomberg


Also read: From vaccines to oxygen, Centre-state volleyball needs to end


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

10 COMMENTS

  1. I held print with higher standard of reporting as they claim in every place.

    How much are you charging for a monthly subscription. A vaccine is not even worth so much is what you think.

    When your economics tells you that you should charge a high subscription price, why don’t you do same calculations for vaccine manufacturers.

    Government did not fund the research, trails or any of the development. What it is.giving is loan, where does the government have moral right to reduce the price, otherthan using its sovereign powers to stop exports and buy at a negligible price. Probably the vaccine producers agreed thinking they could export a d subsidize India. But with exports being stopped they can be profitable with a competitive pricing.

  2. Well people donated and contributed generously to the PM Care’ Fund to help manage calamities. These funds have been given to the vaccine manufacturers to expand production capacity as a grant. Do the citizens still need to pay to get vaccination? Needs serious thinking!

  3. Even the most capitalist countries are providing vaccination for free… Instead of putting money in bad useless places (if there are any) government should vaccinate everybody for free… It is even justified if government take a huge loan for it… It is all worth it… It will earn them way more in dividends later…

  4. When did modi really worry about economics?

    Anyways, it may be interesting to see if vaccine makers invest in any electoral bonds.

  5. I can pay and would like to pay for all my family members to be vaccinated. Lots of people in this country can afford the vaccine charges. It is a small price to pay – especially so in comparison to the loss of income or livelihood we will face if this pandemic prevails. Why politicize everything?

    • You’re not poor. Good for you! But what about those multitudes of Indians who are hand to mouth and cannot afford the inflated price of the vaccines but yet have to go out and find work to feed their families? Those who can afford will get vaccinated and those who NEED it won’t. That’s the inequality being talked about in the article, which your view and comment confirms.

  6. This is what I call socialist BS. If you don’t incentivise private enterprise with profits you will kill the goose that lays the egg. The government can subsidise the vaccine for poorer people, but private enterprise needs to charge appropriate prices for the system to work. The vaccine should not be free for everyone.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular