Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Assocham event in New Delhi on 20 December | Praveen Jain | ThePrint
File photo of Prime Minister Narendra Modi | Praveen Jain | ThePrint
Text Size:

The dramatic changes that the Narendra Modi government has made to India’s citizenship laws is roiling the country. While the domestic-political implications of these policies are clear, the international implications are less so. There are good reasons to expect that negative fallouts will be limited. But there is also the very real danger of hubris and overconfidence in India’s power to handle these challenges.

As others have pointed out, the immediate difficulties are likely to be in India’s relations with Bangladesh and Afghanistan, both of which are named in the recently passed Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Both have been good friends and look to India for support. This has gotten the governments of Ashraf Ghani and Sheikh Hasina in trouble domestically, with their political opponents castigating them as Indian stooges. Both countries are also critical to Indian security, and Indian governments have assiduously wooed them. The task becomes harder now, especially with China waiting in the wings.


Also read: Modi govt’s adamant stand on citizenship will push India’s neighbours into China’s arms


Muted international reaction

In the broader setting, though, the implications are less clear. Domestic behaviour, even egregiously bad ones, often have little impact on how countries behave towards each other. Nations may not like the way another nation treats its people and they may even criticise it – like they did when India scrapped the special status of Jammu and Kashmir – but they often do little beyond that, unless there are other strong political or security reasons for them to take action. This is why the muted international reaction, especially from the Muslim world, to China’s atrocities on Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province is not much of a surprise.

But also note that this varies according to both a country’s power and its importance to others. Stronger countries can generally expect to get away with behaviour that would have graver consequences for weaker ones: don’t expect leaders of any major powers to see the insides of the Hague Tribunal for war crimes. Equally, some countries are valuable to others as allies – sometimes just because of their location. Pakistan is a good example of the latter.

It is possible that both of these reasons will limit any negative international response to the Modi government’s recent actions. India is now a relatively powerful player in Asian and global politics and this by itself could persuade others to ignore India’s domestic troubles. Additionally, India is now sought after as a balancer to China both by smaller Asian powers and the US, which should also dissuade others.


Also read: Ahead of 2+2 talks, 3 major US dailies put India’s anti-CAA protests on front page


India’s hubris

India, however, also faces the very real danger of over-confidence. Indian leaders have often exaggerated the nation’s power and influence – from the 1950s to unfortunately even now. There can be little doubt that India has grown stronger, but unlike China, it is not a major trading power that has the capacity to punish its trading partners for political reasons.

India’s refusal to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), even if with good reasons, actually reduces its clout by potentially limiting its trading power. And despite the size of its military and its nuclear weapons, it has little capacity to reach much beyond its borders. Closer to home, India in the last two decades has become relatively weaker vis-à-vis China, something that is unlikely to change in the near future.

India may also not be as important or indispensable to others as much as it thinks it is. Sure, the US has invested heavily in India, despite Indian coyness about partnering with the US. American proponents of US-India partnership have suggested that the US should help strengthen India because a stronger India will represent a natural balance to China and thus indirectly benefit the US. But there are growing doubts about the partnership in the US, and even its strongest proponents are no longer as sanguine.

Moreover, these doubts are rising at a time when the foreign policy consensus in the US is increasingly questioning US’ global commitments. President Donald Trump may express his distaste for most US alliances somewhat crudely, but an increasingly popular US foreign policy view is that the US should let allies do their own balancing and America should only step in if allies are unable to do so. Such offshore balancing approach is what an adviser to former President Barack Obama characterised as ‘leading from behind’, a lineage that suggests that the idea has more bipartisan legs and intellectual heft than is usually recognised in India. If American strategy moves in this direction, it could easily flip the earlier logic: the US need not go out of its way to support New Delhi because India has little choice but to balance China anyway. This has obvious implications for how much leeway India has on other issues, including domestic politics.


Also read: Modi govt is obsessed with exercising power instead of focusing on what matters — economy


Dependability

India’s confidence in its attractiveness to smaller Pacific powers should also not be taken for granted. They are unlikely to be thrilled about India’s waffling on both trade and balancing China.

New Delhi often complains about others’ undependability, but it needs to worry about whether this applies to India itself. Even if none of this matters in this particular instance, it will not be a bad idea to become a bit more realistic about India’s power and indispensability.

The author is professor in International Politics at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

3 Comments Share Your Views

3 COMMENTS

  1. Those in India who are mourning Labour Party’s loss in the UK elections are nothing but BJP haters who would have liked nothing better than an ultra-communist Corbyn to raise Article 370 issue. Fortunately the UK’s electorate is too wise to let such personalities destroy whatever goodwill the UK has with other countries. Keep crying your Labour supporters in India.

  2. There is no such thing as a positive global image. It is self-interest all the way. The so called ‘superpowers’ hardly pay attention to what ‘minnow’ nations think. The back cover of one of best sellers ‘How to hide an empire’ by Prof Daniel Immerwahr has a compilation of 6 interesting statements including: “The US is the only great power without a history of imperialistic claims”, and sums up that all 6 statements made none other than by the US presidents over a period of time are FALSE. Well, so much for the global image.

    The West is obsessed with China and will find ways to counter its rise. Their only concern in the sub-continent is the risk of nuclear war. This ‘global image’ bogey is raised by those in the media or paid attention to by readers (one of them very prolific on this website) who still suffer from slave mentality and lack of self-esteem. That said, the current ultra-nationalistic Indian government should make a much more vigorous effort to alleviate poverty and provide impetus to economic growth. Jai Hind.

  3. Rebuilding India’s economic strength will take time. Staying away from RCEP will have both economic and diplomatic consequences. However, some recent missteps could have been avoided. Nothing would have been lost if Representative Pramila Jayapal had been part of the delegation that met with EAM. A Conservative government complained when India intervened with the object of defeating Labour candidates. How India is portrayed in the global media affects how the general public in foreign countries views India, ripples upwards to their lawmakers and governments. Not looking triple AAA rated at the moment.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here