Wednesday, February 1, 2023
HomeOpinionIf Indian states were countries, Delhi beat China's TFR, but population policy...

If Indian states were countries, Delhi beat China’s TFR, but population policy still lost

India's focus on population control policy is misplaced. According to SRS 2018, urban India TFR fell below the UN limit.

Text Size:

India’s Total Fertility Rate declined from 5.2 to 4.5 between 1971 and 1981, and from 3.6 to 2.2 between 1991 and 2018, according to SRS 2018. TFR of a population is the average number of children that would be born to a woman over her lifetime. According to the UN Population Division, a TFR of 2.1 children per woman is considered to be replacement level TFR. With a TFR of 2.1, a population would successfully replace itself without increasing or decreasing the numbers. As per SRS 2018, urban India had a TFR of 1.7 while rural India had a TFR of 2.4.

This shows that India’s overall TFR rate has declined to replacement levels and the focus on population control policies is misplaced.

If Indian states were countries, how would they compare with countries that may have a comparable GDP Per Capita in terms of TFR? In this fourth part in our series on Indian states as countries, we will turn our attention to TFR. In our previous installments, we had looked at life expectancyGDP per capita, and female labour force participation rate across Indian states.

Among Indian states, Delhi and West Bengal have the lowest TFR of 1.5. With GDP Per Capita of Intl $ 17,807, Delhi finds itself closest to Grenada (Intl $ 17,771) and ahead of China (Intl $ 16,773) but the state bests both in terms of TFR as China and Grenada have a higher TFR of 1.69 and 2.06 respectively. Similarly, West Bengal’s GDP Per Capita of Intl $ 5,345 places it between Myanmar (Intl $ 5,297) and Nigeria (Intl $ 5,353) but its TFR of 1.5 is far lower than Myanmar (2.15) and Nigeria (5.39).

Also read: Lower population good for India’s health. Time to get over ‘if and but’ approach

According to SRS 2018, Bihar’s TFR of 3.2 is the highest in the country with Uttar Pradesh following it at 2.9. But like Delhi, and West Bengal, Bihar with a GDP Per Capita of Intl $ 2,076, also finds itself doing better in terms of TFR than other countries which have a similar GDP Per Capita. Guinea-Bissau (Intl $ 2,021) has a TFR of 4.48, while Afghanistan (Intl $ 2,152) has a TFR of 4.47. Uttar Pradesh’s GDP Per Capita (Intl $ 3,310) places it between Vanuatu (Intl $ 3,250) and Benin (Intl $ 3,426) but its TFR of 2.9 is lower than both (Vanuatu: 3.78, Benin: 4.83).

The data for states’ TFR has been taken from SRS 2018 while their GDP Per Capita is calculated Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (MoSPI) report on Indian State Domestic Product 2019. For other countries both TFR and GDP Per Capita data have been taken from the World Bank database.

As per SRS 2018, eight states had a TFR higher than replacement level. These are Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh.

Ankur Bhardwaj is Editor, Centre for Economic Data and Analysis. Vibhav Khandelwal is Student of Economics and Finance, Ashoka University.

Views are personal.

This article was first published on CEDA.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism