‘Patriotic’ BJP-ruled states too have failed in processing all documents sought by NRC, leaving many bona fide Indian citizens in the lurch.
That “India is for Indians first” should not be in dispute. Indeed, control over a nation’s borders is central to the conception of the Westphalian nation-state. But India has not done terribly well on this count, with several porous borders, most notably with Bangladesh in the east. As a consequence, for decades, there’s been a steady influx of illegal Bangladeshi migrants entering India looking for a better life. The government estimates around two crore illegal Bangladeshis currently live and work in India. Many manage to get local documents, which they’re not entitled to, perhaps with the connivance of political parties for whom they are a useful votebank.
One of the Narendra Modi government’s attempts to crack down on such an overt challenge to India’s control over its borders is updating the National Register of Citizens (NRC), jointly produced by the central and the Assam governments. The NRC has not been updated since 1951, and in 2013, before Modi came to power, the Supreme Court mandated an update. This gave the Modi government an opportunity to promote its more muscular agenda at the border. The trouble is, the final draft has left 40 lakh individuals out of the list, some of whom are presumably legitimate Indian citizens.
In fact, as it’s been reported widely in the media, quite a few bona fide Indians who have no connection to Bangladesh have been left out of the list. These individuals face, in theory, deportation or other dire consequences and disenfranchisement at a minimum. They could be the collateral damage of the government’s stated goal to secure the borders and keep out illegal migrants.
Also read: In Assam, NRC is now National Register of Confusion
Yet if this were really the goal, it’s odd that no agreement has been reached with Bangladesh on the would-be deportees. Without such an agreement, where exactly will these individuals go? Bangladesh denies any of these people are theirs, making it unlikely that a solution would be in the offing. Indeed, India’s record on deporting illegal Bangladeshis back to Bangladesh is not one of much success. In 2017, a grand total of 51 individuals were deported, according to the government.
Advocates of the NRC assert somewhat improbably that all of the necessary legal safeguards are in place so that no one legitimate will be left out of the final list. But this is problematic for several reasons. First, the documentary requirements to prove citizenship under the rules governing the NRC are quite stringent, and it’s entirely plausible that many legitimate individuals simply cannot cross this hurdle. How many of us have documents going to back to our grandparents’ generation? Yet documents predating the Bangladesh war of 1971 are mandatory under the NRC. Privileged folk with resources and connections may be able to meet the NRC’s requirements; you can be sure that many poor and disadvantaged people simply cannot cope with such demands.
But there’s a second and more fundamental problem with the assertion. Advocates pre-suppose that the Indian state functions well. Anyone who’s actually dealt with the Indian state at any level knows otherwise. The truth is that the state has very limited capacity and there is no reason to feel reassured that this low level of capacity is sufficient to lead to a fair and complete NRC.
There is an additional serious complication, which is that putting together the NRC requires the cooperation not just of the central and the Assam governments but the governments of all the other states and Union Territories (UT) who’ve been queried to certify documents concerning individuals who may have migrated from these states.
This requires that not only all the other states have sufficient capacity but also that they have the political will to devote capacity to what is essentially someone else’s problem. If there is limited cooperation by other states, the NRC by definition is doomed to be flawed and incomplete because it will miss out a large chunk of migrants along with any others who get left out through other sources of error.
My data analysis shows that this is indeed the dire situation we’re in.
Data submitted to the Supreme Court tells us the number of documents sought by NRC from each state and UT and how many were actually processed and returned over a three year-period up until March 2018. The chart presents data on all states plus Delhi but excludes other UTs where presumably the cooperation of the central government can be assumed and the number of cases involved is tiny.
The numbers do not paint a pretty picture. The national average on compliance percentage as of 23 March 2018 is 30.6 per cent. This however masks considerable variation ranging from Goa at 95.3 per cent to Chhattisgarh, which is at zero.
One might assume that states ruled by the BJP or its allies would have a higher compliance rate than non-BJP ruled states and this in fact is true. The average for states ruled by BJP or its allies is 37.4 per cent or above the national average. The average for non-BJP ruled states is a paltry 9.21 per cent.
Strikingly, West Bengal is at only 6.5 per cent, in other words even below the average for states not ruled by the BJP or allies. This is low by any standard and it would be reasonable to assume that West Bengal’s low compliance reflects as much the state government’s lack of interest or even hostility to the NRC as it does poor state capacity.
Also read: NRC shows Supreme Court has made a messy issue messier
The bottom line is that less than a third of files sent from Assam to other states have been processed: potentially leaving countless people unregistered through no fault of their own. This is not a trivial problem, given how important inter-state migration is in India.
As documented in the Economic Survey 2016-17, inter-state migration is higher than is commonly believed, estimated to be about 90 lakh a year between 2011 and 2016. Even a relatively poor state like Assam receives migrants from other states. In fact, as the Economic Survey documents, Assam is an important recipient of migrants from West Bengal. There are therefore without doubt many Bengali migrants in Assam who’ve been left out of the NRC.
There is an overarching paradox here. The notion of “India is for Indians first” is the result of decades of poor state capacity, leading to porous borders and countless illegal migrants. Yet, the proposed solution, ironically, presupposes strong state capacity: that governments at the Centre and all the states are able to process lakhs of documents in a timely fashion. And as we have seen, as expected, compliance has been poor, even from “patriotic” BJP-ruled states. There is either a huge cognitive dissonance or unalloyed hypocrisy in such an assumption.
Rupa Subramanya is an independent researcher and economist. Twitter: @rupasubramanya
It is difficult task and will remain so for ever.
You simply criticise. That is easy.
Your wisdom should come out with a solution.
Or better you remove necessities of passport and visa for India. Anybody can come here from any where for any time. Can stay or reside as they wish.
After all Atithi devo bhavo..!
Mr Hazela supervising NRC work has clarified that they left out people can now submit their claims. SC is monitoring it and is exp[ected to be very fair in concluding who is not a citizen. So why is this hurry for finding faults in BJP government? Other parties especially TMC is unnecessarily very hyperventilating on this issue. I think SC should issue a notice that nobody should draw any premature conclusion until NRC list is final. Later on, SC will definitely guide the government to take a right decision.
This NRC list is final ; that is the reason for the outrage.
Secondly , there are glaring mistakes which have been made , some of which have been pointed out.
The issue now is how these mistakes will be rectified ; on what basis will those who have been left out of the NRC now be included ?
Just because someone is related to an ex-Vice President or someone is an ex-Army person does not necessarily mean that they should get preference in their cases being taken up for consideration favourably , while others who may also be legitimate Indian citizens but are not so noteworthy are ignored.
So how will these 40 lakh omissions be dealt with ?
That is the only issue which needs to be discussed , and this has nothing to do with what other states have done.
People in other states do not have the same problem with migrants as the Assamese ; the NRC was born out of the problem of the Assamese ; how is it even relevant if lakhs of migrants have moved to Tamil Nadu or Kerala ?
Twenty million illegal Bangladeshi immigrants living in India is the stuff of election rhetoric. It feeds into a narrative of India being “ swamped “, as Enoch Powell once feared Britain would be. Without a terribly destabilising nationwide crackdown, there is no way of assessing the size of the problem. Over time, ration cards, water and electricity connection, voter IDs, now Aadhaar cards, these industrious, God fearing folk must have built up their personal folders. More to the point is the figure of 51 persons deported in 2017. Meaning no disrespect, that is where this entire NRC exercise is headed. Think of the hardship residents of Assam have been subjected to, spare a thought also for overworked government servants in Assam who have toiled on this. Nothing about NRC gets my vote.