The Sarsanghchalak, as the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) calls its chief, makes his equivalent of the State of the Union address on Dussehra at the organisation’s headquarters in Nagpur. It always makes some news, but more now when the BJP is in power, in its second term, with a bigger majority than in the first. More so, when this government is delivering what are considered RSS’s “core concerns”: Scrapping of Article 370 in Kashmir, Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.
The chief for a decade now, Mohan Bhagwat made more news than usual this year because he waded into the issue of lynchings and his definition of who’s a Hindu, who’s an Indian, and are both necessarily synonymous. His arguments on both issues were contentious and drew much attention, some in criticism and, among his faithful, in appreciation. In the process, a very significant issue that he dwelt on at great length was missed. That’s what we are exploring more critically today.
It will be useful if you listened to just some parts of that 63-minute speech again. Just the first minute, and then about 14 minutes from 28:00 to 42:00, laying out his economic philosophy. The key lies in what comes in the very introductory seconds. He begins by mentioning important anniversaries of two most eminent and venerated Indians, Guru Nanak Dev (550th anniversary) and Mahatma Gandhi (150th). I do not believe many outside the RSS-BJP ecosystem, or those who follow and study Indian politics closely, would be so familiar with the third — Dattopant Thengadi — whose centenary year, he noted, would begin soon (10 November).
That name may not ring a bell. And certainly, he wasn’t somebody in the same league as Guru Nanak and Gandhi for anyone, not even the RSS. But he was important enough to find a mention alongside the other two. That it was no insignificant platitude or a passing flourish becomes evident once you hear the second part of those 14 minutes carefully.
Born in Wardha, not far from Nagpur, in 1920, Thengadi was one of the modern (post-Independence) founding fathers (it isn’t politically incorrect to use that here) of the RSS and the ideology of its political offspring in both its avatars, Bharatiya Jana Sangh (BJS) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) now. His area of interest was the economy. His thought has defined the economic worldview of the RSS more than any other, especially in the past 30 years, or generally when India began opening up its economy.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
Thengadi was a fellow traveller of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Both formed the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), the labour arm of the RSS, together in Bhopal in 1955. They also fought bitterly and unforgivingly during the six years of the Vajpayee government. On the economy, Thengadi was the biggest thorn in his side, opposing all his decisions, especially the privatisation of PSUs, reduction of import tariffs and opening up to FDI.
At one point, he demanded the head of Yashwant Sinha, then leading the reform push as finance minister. Vajpayee resisted for a year, but eventually gave in. Thengadi had real power within the “sangathan” (organisation), as BJP/RSS people often describe themselves collectively. He also detested Arun Shourie. He likely celebrated when a Supreme Court judgment, harking back to old Socialist mindsets, ruled that it was mandatory to seek a parliamentary vote before selling any PSU. It stopped Shourie in his tracks. Important to note in today’s context that this happened exactly when the Vajpayee government had put the two big oil marketing companies, HPCL and BPCL, on the block.
Thengadi’s wasn’t a lone voice. His first child, BMS, protested against the Vajpayee reform era, often louder than the Left and the Congress-affiliated INTUC, and grew in strength. Meanwhile, he had formed two more powerful pressure groups: Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS) in 1979 for farmers and Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), which we are all more familiar with today, in 1991. Remember that year, 1991? When the big Narasimha Rao-Manmohan Singh reform was launched? SJM subsequently built a national voice and stature by opposing globalisation of trade, beginning with what was called the Dunkel Draft. K.N. Govindacharya, then the customary RSS man in the BJP as general secretary, was its most prominent spokesman.
By the end of Vajpayee’s tenure, relations between the two had deteriorated visibly. Often, when a modern new idea was mentioned, Vajpayee would say with a smirk something like, “arrey bhai, Thengadi ji ko kaun sambhalega… (who will manage Thengadi now). But it was in spite of that bitter fight that Vajpayee cleared Bt cotton seeds. In 16 years under Manmohan Singh and Modi, not one new seed has been cleared.
The fight ended in 2004. In May, Vajpayee lost power; later that year, on 14 October, Thengadi passed away. Probably with the satisfaction that the new UPA government, controlled by the Left, had dumped privatisation forthwith and launched a flurry of welfare schemes of just the kind he would have wanted.
Now that we know more about Thengadi, who the Sarsanghchalak listed among eminences like Guru Nanak Dev and Mahatma Gandhi, we can translate the 14 minutes on the economy in Bhagwat’s annual sermon better.
Quick summary: There’s an economic crisis, but don’t make too much of it. Why paint the devil on the wall? GDP isn’t the only measure of growth. Crack down on corruption, but don’t victimise the innocent. We believe in Swadeshi, but doesn’t mean we say isolate yourselves. Trade is global but we should only buy what we cannot make and need. Why import even cow semen from a Brazilian hybrid developed with an Indian native? Use Swadeshi. He then talks about how exports are good, imports are bad, the RSS principle of frugality, buying only what you must, protecting what you make from competition, and so on.
Some of it isn’t the exact translation but my faithful interpretation. Then he comes to FDI. Again, paraphrased: Foreigners can invest but learn from countries which insist on one native board member with veto rights. So, foreigners own the shares but power is with our government. On the other hand, see what’s happening. Our (new) companies are seen to be owned and run by Indians, but once you look deeper, shareholding is with the Chinese. This is classical Thengadinomics.
It also runs contrary to many of the recent moves and promises of the Modi government, as it battles with India’s gravest economic downturn since 2008. It is opening more areas to FDI, negotiating new trade arrangements, especially with America, and the RCEP closer to the region. It has also announced massive privatisation as the mood-lifter for the economy and a plasma transfusion for the fisc. Both trade deals and PSU sales are being opposed by the Swadeshi Jagran Manch, as are new agricultural, especially seed technologies.
On each front, the Modi government has made moves in the opposite direction: What would make Vajpayee smile and Thengadi frown. You know what, the biggest PSU put on the block now, BPCL, is exactly what Vajpayee had been thwarted from selling in 2003. We can also see it isn’t something Modi thought of just now. Buried in the 187 obsolete laws repealed in a 2016 mass-cull was also the 1976 Act passed under Indira Gandhi to nationalise MNC Burmah Shell and rename it BPCL. If it all went through unnoticed by the Left, Right and Centre in Parliament, ask your MPs why they were asleep or gossiping in Central Hall.
We can’t say as yet if, by holding forth on Swadeshi economics in such detail, Bhagwat is showing intent to fight back again. It is unlikely, given the power differential between Vajpayee and Modi. But not impossible. Our hope: An ideology has yet to be discovered which might even believe that the best way to get out of a hole, especially of the kind India’s economy has fallen into, is to keep digging deeper.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.