Srinagar: A new political front is in the works in Kashmir, amid the phased release of leaders detained when the Narendra Modi government scrapped Article 370 last August, ThePrint has learnt.
The new formation is likely to draw its ranks from various political outfits in Jammu & Kashmir, and could include activists, analysts and former journalists.
Crucially, it might prioritise statehood and a permanent domicile law over the restoration of Article 370, under which Jammu & Kashmir enjoyed special status, individuals privy to discussions about the new front said.
According to the sources, the proposed front will be announced as soon as all stakeholders arrive at a consensus.
“We have to fight with the BJP within the system laid down by it. There are no other options,” a politician involved in the talks said.
‘Trying to reach a consensus’
In one of its most controversial decisions, the Modi government stripped the state of Jammu and Kashmir of its special status and split into two union territories — J&K and Ladakh — in August.
The decision was accompanied by the detention of hundreds of local political leaders to reportedly prevent blowback against the revocation of Article 370, which was seen by Kashmiris as a condition for their accession to India in 1947.
As a result, political activity in the state came to a halt until the first batch of releases in October.
While several senior politicians including former chief ministers Omar and Farooq Abdullah (National Conference) and Mehbooba Mufti (Peoples Democratic Party) remain in detention, many have since been freed.
Speaking to ThePrint, former J&K deputy chief minister and senior PDP leader Muzaffar Baig admitted that several local stakeholders were ready to overlook Article 370 for the larger interest of the region.
“I have been meeting a lot of people in my individual capacity… People who are concerned about the welfare of J&K, like activists, political leaders, journalists,” added Baig, who has often expressed his displeasure with the PDP leadership. “We are trying to reach a consensus and talks have been underway.”
Referring to the petitions filed in the apex court against the scrapping of Article 370, he said, “If the Supreme Court gives directions in favour of scrapping Article 370, there are many in Kashmir who would instead demand full statehood and a new domicile law for J&K.”
“I think the central government has recently given indications that it is considering the two options for J&K.”
If these two things materialise, Baig added, “there are many individuals and well-wishers of J&K who would like to work for its uplift”.
J&K, he said, is one of the oldest states of India, “and it is imperative that it continues to be a state”.
“In a union territory, everything is managed by the home department and all powers lie with the lieutenant governor. In such a scenario, the assembly has far less power,” he said.
“But if statehood is restored and a domicile law introduced under Article 371, which exists (makes concessions) for hill states, we will be able to secure important areas like jobs. There are 70,000 to 80,000 unemployed youths in J&K,” he added.
Also read: Kashmir freeze will continue in 2020 as Modi govt’s promises to develop Valley look bleak
‘People are coming together’
While Baig claimed the discussions were centred on the Supreme Court order, sources said the formation may come into being sooner, given the role of other “key individuals”.
These include former PDP leader Altaf Bukhari and former MP and Congress leader Tariq Kara. According to sources, Kara recently met “leaders of a regional political party to hold talks”.
Approached for comment, Kara said he was not in Kashmir and would not be able to discuss the matter over the phone. Bukhari, however, said “people are coming together to work for the welfare of the state”.
“A lot of things have changed in the Valley and there is a lot of hopelessness, but that doesn’t mean that we leave politics and sit at home,” he said over the telephone. “There is no denying that people are coming together to work for the welfare of the state. Our state’s existence has ended; we have to work to bring it back into existence.”
“As of now, I don’t belong to any political party, so I am meeting a lot of people. If there is a need to create a group, it will be created. I appeal everyone to unite and be part of a single group to work for the welfare of J&K.”
Meanwhile, there is speculation that the central government plans to free all the detained politicians soon, barring members of the Abdullah and Mufti families and their confidants, whose release may be delayed.
This decision, sources said, is meant to give politicians from National Conference, PDP and Sajad Lone’s Peoples Conference time to decide whether they wish to stand by the Gupkar declaration, or be part of the new political landscape.
Signed by all major political parties of Kashmir a day before the scrapping of Article 370, the Gupkar declaration termed any move against the constitutional provision an act of war against the people of the state.
Also read: Internet not fully restored, but J&K Police to connect with people on social media
“States existance has not ended ” Mr Bukhari , yes your existance has ended. Yes u are correct in saying “you don’t belong to any poltical party now ” and people know you were never belonging to any and every one knows you belong to whom. Make hey till those who belong at least to their factions are set free.
i totally condemn what bjp is doing to kashmir and support what you say but NOT: also a complete ban on marrying Kashmir ki kalis – kashmiri women have as much right to marry who they wish as any other human. please, think before you speak/write – do not utter nonsense even if it is in the right cause.
Central Government will have to restore the statehood alongside protection of jobs & domicile status for the residents of State. It cannot deprive us from our rights. Sooner or later the BJP Government will fall in line to restore the full statehood. It’s better for them also as a face saving to the people in general. We have already suffered a lot alongside stoppage of Internet Services & development. State can’t be developed by outsiders than the local industry. Outsiders come to State only the reap subsidies & tax benefits besides cheating the banks & public money in the garb of sick units as well.
This is a good sign by the J&K politicians. Autonomy under Indian constitution can be granted and J&K can enjoy certain special provisions. But all this talk of a separate constitution, and a flag will not find any takers in rest of the India.
Let there be light. Restoration of statehood – barring Ladakh, where LG Murmu could be transferred – would mark a very happy augury for the future. With the way Article 370 has been nibbled away over the decades, a residency law, and restrictions on purchase of property by outsiders – also a complete ban on marrying Kashmir ki kalis- appears to be a reasonable course of action. 2. Who will pick up the tab for the last six months remains hazy. 3. The fact that the apex court could not rule on such a profoundly momentous issue will become part of its historical ledger.
You must be a sick person, suggesting there should be ban on marriages. If a Kashmiri marries someone else it’s his/her decision, who are you to start giving your opinion on this matter? What is the difference between you and the RSS people?