Tuesday, February 7, 2023
HomeIndiaNepal’s objection to Lipulekh road likely at the behest of ‘someone else’,...

Nepal’s objection to Lipulekh road likely at the behest of ‘someone else’, says Army chief

Last week, Nepal responded with anger after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh inaugurated the road up to Lipulekh, built for pilgrims to Kailash Mansarovar.

Text Size:

New Delhi: Nepal’s objection to India’s newly-inaugurated road via the Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand is likely at the behest of “someone else”, Army Chief General M.M. Naravane said Friday, hinting at a possible Chinese role behind the row.

Addressing an online conference organised by the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, a New Delhi-based think-tank, Naravane said the east of the Kali river is Nepalese territory while its west is Indian territory. “There is no dispute about that. The road we have built is west of the river.”

The Army chief also said he didn’t understand the purpose behind the agitation.

“I don’t know what they are actually agitating about. There has never been any problem in this Corps in the past. There is a reason to believe that they might have raised this problem at the behest of someone else and that is very much a possibility,” he said.

Last week, Nepal responded with alarm and anger, even handing out a diplomatic note to the Indian envoy in Kathmandu, after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh inaugurated the road up to Lipulekh, which has been built for pilgrims to Kailash Mansarovar. In a strong statement on 9 May, it also asked India to “refrain from carrying out any activity inside the territory of Nepal”.

Sources in the Indian defence establishment suspect China’s role behind Nepal’s move to raise objections. However, Kathmandu has rubbished such suggestions.

Also read: Nepal wants India to settle Lipulekh border issue before talks on new Kailash Mansarovar road

‘Face-off at LAC happen when new local commanders take over’

Meanwhile, the Army chief again sought to play down the face-offs last week between the Indian and Chinese troops at the Line of Actual Control in north Sikkim and eastern Ladakh.

Gen M.M. Naravane ruled out any larger Chinese ploy, a day after he issued a statement saying the two incidents were not linked, and everything is being resolved mutually as per established protocols and strategic guidelines given by Prime Minister Narendra Modi after the two informal India-China summits.

On Friday, the Army chief said such face-offs are very common and it is “business as usual”.

“In fact, you are coming to know where face-off has occurred… Daily we (Indian and Chinese troops) are meeting at 10 different places which is absolutely business as normal. It is only at one or two places where this has happened. And this does happen from time to time. It also happens when there is a change of commanders on ground,” he said.

“A new commander wants to show he is different from the others. There are a lot of dynamics on why a face-off occurs. All of a sudden, at a place where everything was business as usual in the past…” he added.

In the statement Thursday, the Army chief had said that “aggressive behaviour” by both sides resulted in “minor injuries” to troops.

ThePrint reported Thursday that Indian and Chinese armies are working out the dates for the next formal discussions between “higher” military authorities in the Ladakh sector to sort out the tensions arising out of the face-offs.

Last week, ThePrint reported that the situation in Sikkim was “resolved” while official “disengagement” took place in Ladakh even as additional troops were pressed in. Both sides are now stationed at their respective positions within their own territories, but additional part-time infrastructure has come up to house the additional soldiers.

Also read: India’s oldest flying aircraft in spotlight after radar website shows it going to Pakistan


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Dont give your own imaginations in the border dispute. We know what india has been doing to its neighbour countries .it is not the first time and first country (Nepal) encroachment shown by india.Alot of them are there so it doesnot mean we are small than you can blame anything . We are an independent nation and we know our territory.. Dedicated m…

  2. This is utmost disrespect to have come from any official agency against Nepalese sovereignty. A man leading such a prestigious national body should choose his words wisely. Nepal has always been a good ally to India and its army but this is an act of betrayal on our relationship. I can’t even imagine who would have the authority to “behest” the sovereign decisions of Nepal, but if he thinks that its China/Tibet, then why would they even agree to open a pass with India without consulting Nepal in the first place. The Kalapani area was already a disputed area for more than 6 decades as agreed upon by both NEPAL and INDIA. Nepal also plans to take this unlawful bilateral decision made by INDIA and CHINA to open a pass on a through a third country i.e. NEPAL. The way we see it is, INDIA and China are the once working behind our backs but somehow NEPAL gets the blame here too. It wouldn’t be a fruitful way to address this issue if such people try to FORCEFULLY create any baseless narrative to support their wrongdoings. All we want is INDIA to respect our long history of friendly relationship and engage in diplomatic dialogue before jumping into conclusions and making hasty decisions. Nepal is a land of Intellectuals with history and culture, which is also the case for our fellow Indians, there is no dynamic in which CHINA fits in all of this, so there is no need to disrespect the decision of Nepal government and it’s people with such derogatory comments.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular